Guns n' Roses vs. Van HalenEdler Statesman* 09-20-2003, 10:43 PM http://www.critical-solution.com/sitepic.jpg vs. http://www.hiponline.com/artist/music/v/van_halen/van-halen.jpg WHICH ONE IS BETTER? Ric Flair 09-20-2003, 10:44 PM I love Appetite but that was really the only one I liked from GnR. VH had many more awesome tunes. dempsey_k* 09-20-2003, 10:54 PM Guns and Roses, because at least they made one album I could listen to. Padawan 09-21-2003, 12:21 AM Guns 'n' Roses hands down. Epoch 09-21-2003, 01:09 AM Guns n' Roses by a landslide. Zodiac 09-21-2003, 01:33 AM Guns n Roses Unholy Diver 09-21-2003, 08:52 AM I think Gn R might be the most overrated band ever, they had one good album and everyone treats them like they are Led Zepplin Van Halen was a much better band both with Diamond Dave and Sammy Legionnaire 09-21-2003, 09:06 AM Guns and Roses, because at least they made one album I could listen to. I agree with this post Tarkus 09-21-2003, 09:25 AM It's not even close for me. Van Halen. Even with that jackass David Lee Roth in the line-up, VH is melodically, technically, and prolifically superior to G'n'R. EDIT: And Axl Rose is about as big a tool as you'll see outside of Tool. canucksfan 09-21-2003, 09:41 AM Van Halen for me Koltsov71 09-21-2003, 09:44 AM Van Halen. I never cared much for Guns'n'Roses. | ||