Guns n' Roses vs. Van Halen

kmad
09-20-2003, 11:43 PM
http://www.critical-solution.com/sitepic.jpg

vs.

http://www.hiponline.com/artist/music/v/van_halen/van-halen.jpg

WHICH ONE IS BETTER?

Ric Flair
09-20-2003, 11:44 PM
I love Appetite but that was really the only one I liked from GnR. VH had many more awesome tunes.

dempsey_k*
09-20-2003, 11:54 PM
Guns and Roses, because at least they made one album I could listen to.

Padawan
09-21-2003, 01:21 AM
Guns 'n' Roses hands down.

Epoch
09-21-2003, 02:09 AM
Guns n' Roses by a landslide.

Zodiac
09-21-2003, 02:33 AM
Guns n Roses

Unholy Diver
09-21-2003, 09:52 AM
I think Gn R might be the most overrated band ever, they had one good album and everyone treats them like they are Led Zepplin

Van Halen was a much better band both with Diamond Dave and Sammy

Legionnaire
09-21-2003, 10:06 AM
Guns and Roses, because at least they made one album I could listen to.

I agree with this post

Tarkus
09-21-2003, 10:25 AM
It's not even close for me.

Van Halen.

Even with that jackass David Lee Roth in the line-up, VH is melodically, technically, and prolifically superior to G'n'R.

EDIT: And Axl Rose is about as big a tool as you'll see outside of Tool.

canucksfan
09-21-2003, 10:41 AM
Van Halen for me

Koltsov71
09-21-2003, 10:44 AM
Van Halen.

I never cared much for Guns'n'Roses.