Fighting in Hockey: Fantastic, Necessary or Stupid

mrwarden
11-13-2009, 05:51 PM
Vote and Discuss.

Harrison Ford
11-13-2009, 05:52 PM
Fantastically necessary.

Mathias
11-13-2009, 05:55 PM
Fantastic. :handclap:

Rusty Shackleford
11-13-2009, 06:01 PM
Fantastic and necessary.

Morris Wanchuk
11-13-2009, 06:13 PM
Fantastic!



It makes hockey the only sport that you don't shut off when there is a blowout! Its not as good as it used to be (With the instigator in the last 5mins BS) but that just means you got to get your message sending done earlier.



Which gets me back to the 5min rule.. Why would they put that in? Don't they want to entertain their paying fans? I don't think I have ever heard anyone I was at a game with complain that there were too many fights in the last 5mins.

Mathias
11-13-2009, 06:16 PM
Which gets me back to the 5min rule.. Why would they put that in? Don't they want to entertain their paying fans? I don't think I have ever heard anyone I was at a game with complain that there were too many fights in the last 5mins.

The idea I think was so that no team would "goon" it up at the end of a game. I say, just get rid of the instigator all together.

CanadaBacon
11-13-2009, 06:18 PM
I dont think it is either of those options. Its just part of the game.

nyr2k2
11-13-2009, 06:28 PM
Necessary. The goon vs. goon fights have lost a bit of their luster though.

I'd like to see the instigator gone as well.

BraveSirRobin
11-13-2009, 07:02 PM
Necessary. A great way to wake your team up if they're playing sluggish, also for making someone answer for questionable hits. One example would be the Wisniewski-Doan fight a few weeks ago. After Doan got hit, he and Wiz went toe to toe later in the game. Of course it doesn't always work that way, but after the game Doan considered the whole thing done after the fight. Just shows how important fights can be in our sport. I will echo the desire to see the instigator rule done with, as well.

You can also call it fantastic for the fact that a grand majority of fans at the game will go crazy when a fight happens.

Opus
11-13-2009, 07:06 PM
I'm not at all against fighting in hockey, in fact I love it...but I don't think it's necessary.

While I love two guys getting into a tussle to charge their respective teams, I'm getting a little sick and tired of the fights that break out after a clean hit is delivered.

El Duderino
11-13-2009, 08:05 PM
Fantastic and stupid. I find it extremely silly watching two goons randomly start throwing fists, at the same time, I'm thoroughly entertained!

DrinkFightFlyers
11-13-2009, 08:06 PM
Necessarily fantastic.

saskganesh
11-13-2009, 09:32 PM
its stupid and having a forum about it is stupid too.

albeit fighting is engaging to watch, much like train wrecks or plane crashes are.

Dagoon44
11-13-2009, 10:31 PM
its stupid and having a forum about it is stupid too.

albeit fighting is engaging to watch, much like train wrecks or plane crashes are.

Well here is the simple fact Fighting is part of the game . If you don't like it don't watch it . There is plenty of college hockey you can watch. And having a forum for it is for fans of it. If you don;t want in it leave :yo:

The Thomas J.*
11-13-2009, 10:39 PM
Fantastic & needed!

highoffglass
11-13-2009, 10:41 PM
Fantastic and necessary!!!

KotsyJr
11-13-2009, 10:52 PM
It's been around forever. It's part of the game.

I say it's both fantastic and necessary.

Opus
11-13-2009, 10:57 PM
its stupid and having a forum about it is stupid too.

Thanks for your input, feel free to ignore the forum if you don't find it useful.

BIG
11-13-2009, 11:51 PM
its stupid and having a forum about it is stupid too.

albeit fighting is engaging to watch, much like train wrecks or plane crashes are.
I'd be surprised if you ever return to back up this opinion.

CanadaBacon
11-14-2009, 12:30 AM
I'd be surprised if you ever return to back up this opinion.

How is he suppose to back it up? its an opinion, not a fact.

BIG
11-14-2009, 01:37 AM
How is he suppose to back it up? its an opinion, not a fact.
An opinion would be based on a variety of facts. That is, assuming it's logical.

skipole
11-14-2009, 05:27 AM
An opinion would be based on a variety of facts. That is, assuming it's logical.

Bananas taste better than oranges.

^^ That's my opinion, is it based on facts? No. An opinion is often just that - an opinion. If he thinks "fights are stupid" maybe it's just because he doesn't enjoy watching them. He doesn't need to explain the facts about head injuries or something.

Washington Capitals
11-14-2009, 05:50 AM
1.Necessary then fantastic.

BIG
11-14-2009, 02:38 PM
Bananas taste better than oranges.

^^ That's my opinion, is it based on facts? No. An opinion is often just that - an opinion. If he thinks "fights are stupid" maybe it's just because he doesn't enjoy watching them. He doesn't need to explain the facts about head injuries or something.
There's still a reason for that opinion, and whether it's factual evidence or not it should be reinforced. Even if this was the case, my initial point was misinterpreted a little. I meant he wouldn't return to reinforce his opinion, whether through data or just why he thinks fights are stupid.

Brassard Calder
11-14-2009, 02:41 PM
Fantastic and necessary.

Bring_Bak_Damphousse
11-14-2009, 05:54 PM
Fantastically necessary.

My vote goes to fantastic but I agree with everyone else who voted for fantastically necessary. I'm not sure the "staged" fights have any major impact on the momentum of the game but it gets the fans out of there seats just like a big save or goal and that's a good thing.

starsfan24
11-14-2009, 06:05 PM
Fantastic and somewhat necessary.

Dirk316
11-15-2009, 06:37 PM
Fantastic and these days the art of the hockey fight has lost a lot of its meaning. The passion of 2 players on 2 teams that actually hate each other fighting is probably the most exciting aspect about hockey.

Thanks to Bettman we have no more real rivalries get the so called "staged" fights.