HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   San Jose Sharks (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=43)
-   -   Waived: 2/6 A. Murray; cleared 2/7 (guessing he's on his way to Worcester) (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1099723)

KirbyDots 02-06-2012 11:12 AM

2/6 A. Murray; cleared 2/7 (guessing he's on his way to Worcester)
 
@TSNBobMcKenzie Bob McKenzie
SJS put Andrew Murray on waivers.

KpopandHockey 02-06-2012 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KirbyDots (Post 43681069)
@TSNBobMcKenzie Bob McKenzie
SJS put Andrew Murray on waivers.

Whatttt....

bleedteal12 02-06-2012 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KirbyDots (Post 43681069)
@TSNBobMcKenzie Bob McKenzie
SJS put Andrew Murray on waivers.

:huh: But why?

I'm at a loss as to the reason for his being on McLellan's/DW's **** list.

LadyStanley 02-06-2012 11:20 AM

2/6 A. Murray
 
TSNBobMcKenzie 9:09am via Web SJS put Andrew Murray on waivers. BOS puts Zach Hamill on waivers. And, as reported earlier, CAR puts Anthony Stewart on waivers.


Guessing that with Havlat, Sheppard, Wingels on IR, one or more are close to return and they need a roster spot.

hockeyball 02-06-2012 11:25 AM

Poor TOM. I really liked his play :( Someone must be coming off IR, Sheppard maybe?

210 02-06-2012 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockeyball (Post 43681661)
Poor TOM. I really liked his play :( Someone must be coming off IR, Sheppard maybe?

If it were Sheppard wouldn't they just send McCarthy back without waivers?

SharksFan1 02-06-2012 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 210 (Post 43681749)
If it were Sheppard wouldn't they just send McCarthy back without waivers?

Seriously... what are they doing?

Gilligans Island 02-06-2012 11:30 AM

I had no idea TOM fell below McCarthy, Ferriero and Wingels on the depth chart. Something else must be going on or he became a negative influence?

hockeyball 02-06-2012 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 210 (Post 43681749)
If it were Sheppard wouldn't they just send McCarthy back without waivers?

Maybe they are doing both? Waive Murray, send McCarthy back down, clear roster spots/cap space for someone coming off IR + trade?

Hell if I know, seems odd. Murray was excellent depth, and cheap, why waive him now?

KirbyDots 02-06-2012 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 210 (Post 43681749)
If it were Sheppard wouldn't they just send McCarthy back without waivers?

I'm thinking the same thing. Might be DW is prepping for a move and will send McCarthy down when Havlat or Sheppard is ready. Ferriero was also on the 4th line last game, maybe they liked that look.

TealTownUSA 02-06-2012 11:34 AM

i don't get this move. they should've got rid of mitchell. wtf

KpopandHockey 02-06-2012 11:35 AM

Sheppard must be so good that he causes a team that is thin up front to put forwards on waivers.

magic school bus 02-06-2012 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KpopandHockey (Post 43682099)
Sheppard must be so good that he causes a team that is thin up front to put forwards on waivers.

Join me on the dark side - where we can all hate Sheppard!

OffSydes 02-06-2012 11:39 AM

He has been scratched for 4 games.. Did he do something off the ice?

Gene Parmesan 02-06-2012 11:39 AM

This is rather odd.

Ninja Hertl 02-06-2012 11:42 AM

Probably something behind the scenes that we'll never hear about. Also, why was he excellent depth? He was fast. That's about it.

sonticus 02-06-2012 11:43 AM

McCarthy and Ferriero stay but TOM waived??? Come on now. Ferriero has been lacking lately, to say the least.

Tkachuk4MVP 02-06-2012 11:45 AM

I'm also confused by this. I thought the line of him, Desi, and Winchester looked good in their time together. Certainly the best 4th line we've had all year.

Scottiebrea 02-06-2012 11:46 AM

Not that strange if they re-sign Nolan! :sarcasm:

do0glas 02-06-2012 11:46 AM

that does seem very strange.

Looks like he is UFA next season, and Sheppard is probably coming off of IR soon.

hes a cheap find for a lot of teams who need a 3/4 grinder with speed/strength. probably trying to bait a trade.

BigDmitriy 02-06-2012 11:47 AM

WTF? TOM is SO much better than McCarthy (and both can play center or wing...). I understand keeping Ferriero in case of a needed 2nd line fill-in with Clowe/Couture, but over McCarthy? No way...

Winchester-Desi-TOM was such a good 4th line...unless we're picking up Gaustad? :D :naughty:

210 02-06-2012 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by do0glas (Post 43682555)
that does seem very strange.

Looks like he is UFA next season, and Sheppard is probably coming off of IR soon.

hes a cheap find for a lot of teams who need a 3/4 grinder with speed/strength. probably trying to bait a trade.

You don't put guys on waivers in the NHL to do that...

do0glas 02-06-2012 11:51 AM

cant we recall if there is interest shown? and try to get the team to give something up?

Arrch 02-06-2012 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 210 (Post 43682659)
You don't put guys on waivers in the NHL to do that...

The only thing I can think of is if they expect him to be claimed, then they could be doing it to free up a contract spot, but that's a stretch.

Maybe he asked to be waived because he wasn't getting any playing time.

Scottiebrea 02-06-2012 11:52 AM

Not that strange if they re-sign Nolan! :sarcasm:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.