HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   IIHF World Championship (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Does anybody else find this kind of ironic? (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1193305)

End on a Hinote 05-20-2012 10:26 AM

Does anybody else find this kind of ironic?
 
I guess it depends on how you look at the IIHF's top hockey nations ranking, but the fact that most people in Canada (understandably) don't care about the WHC (and pretty much any IIHF women's tournament), yet the same people are heavily invested in tournaments such as the Olympics and World Cup.

As most people know, a teams performance in the Olympics and World Cup have no bearing on the "official" international ranking list as they are not IIHF tournaments. But shouldn't the ranking list be reason enough why fans should take more time to focus on tournaments like the WHC and IIHF women's tournaments?

Den 05-20-2012 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by End on a Hinote (Post 49923229)
As most people know, a teams performance in the Olympics ... have no bearing on the "official" international ranking list

This "most" would be likely only you...

CoolForumNamePending 05-20-2012 10:39 AM

Olympic results are included in the rankings.

Not sure why you are bringing up women's tournaments (and relative to every other country I would say Canada does care about it) as it would obviously have nothing to do with the men's rankings.

Paxton Fettel 05-20-2012 10:41 AM

the problem with canada is that it's canada that decides when a tournament is important or not for everyone else.

End on a Hinote 05-20-2012 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoolForumNamePending (Post 49923531)
Olympic results are included in the rankings.

Really? I had no idea, figured it didn`t since it`s not IIHF

Den 05-20-2012 10:43 AM

of course it is IIHF

http://www.iihf.com/en/iihf-home/his...urnaments.html

Sens91 05-20-2012 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paxton Fettel (Post 49923567)
the problem with canada is that it's canada that decides when a tournament is important or not for everyone else.

It's not a problem, you beat our olympic team and we feel we've truly been beaten, you beat our whc team and we simply just see the highlights on sportscentre.

That doesn't mean to say we don't care at all about the WHC, we just don't care nearly as much as we do for the Stanley Cup Playoffs that are going on at the same time, we still want to hear Canada did well.

spedico 05-20-2012 10:58 AM

Americans have the most players in NHL, obviously. So they don't get their all players available for the team. They should move the start of the tournament by some time so NHL ends.

Smiddletown 05-20-2012 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by End on a Hinote (Post 49923581)
Really? I had no idea, figured it didn`t since it`s not IIHF

You can look up "olympic ice hockey" on wikipedia where it says IIHF is the governing body. :)

Trotzig 05-20-2012 11:57 AM

World Cup, the tournament that hasn't been played for 8 years and counting?

Jussi 05-20-2012 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smiddletown (Post 49923999)
You can look up "olympic ice hockey" on wikipedia where it says IIHF is the governing body. :)

Just as FIFA, FIBA and other team sports' respective organizations arrange the Olympic qualifying tournaments in their sports.

wereq 05-20-2012 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paxton Fettel (Post 49923567)
the problem with canada is that it's canada that decides when a tournament is important or not for everyone else.

Exactly :)

Dares 05-20-2012 12:05 PM

See people these clowns have no clue about hockey, all they know is NHL.....
Canada does care about WHC...not only HFboards... if you'd win the gold you would all certainly celebrate.
As i said before, I bet Crosby and the rest who didnt accept invitation would play if WC was held in NA, just lazy to come to Europe after playoffs.

Everlasting 05-20-2012 12:05 PM

Its not strange that so many canadiens doesnt care about it. They only have 6 goldmedals since 1960 so its not a real tournament :sarcasm:

Sens91 05-20-2012 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dares (Post 49925503)
See people these clowns have no clue about hockey, all they know is NHL.....
Canada does care about WHC...not only HFboards... if you'd win the gold you would all certainly celebrate.
As i said before, I bet Crosby and the rest who didnt accept invitation would play if WC was held in NA, just lazy to come to Europe after playoffs.

See that is where you are wrong, we really wouldn't lol. There has never been any celebration in Canada from a World Championship victory. Olympics, heck yeah celebrations are huge, but not WHC. Anyways jealousy kills guys, keep bashing Canada. See you in 2014.

Mr Kanadensisk 05-20-2012 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robin929 (Post 49925511)
Its not strange that so many canadiens doesnt care about it. They only have 6 goldmedals since 1960 so its not a real tournament :sarcasm:

I guess we know why Swedes don't care about the U20's then.

Sens91 05-20-2012 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Kanadensisk (Post 49926291)
I guess we know why Swedes don't care about the U20's then.

That's awesome lol.

Everlasting 05-20-2012 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Kanadensisk (Post 49926291)
I guess we know why Swedes don't care about the U20's then.

We care alot about U20 in sweden. Over 530 000 people saw the finals last tournament. Which is ALOT considering it started 02:00 am or something like that. So dont say we dont care becuse we do.

Smiddletown 05-20-2012 01:51 PM

edit: wrong thread.

Ati 05-20-2012 02:10 PM

Wrong thread aswell, nice. But anyway i understand your opinion even though it is wrong.

Jussi 05-20-2012 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robin929 (Post 49927151)
We care alot about U20 in sweden. Over 530 000 people saw the finals last tournament. Which is ALOT considering it started 02:00 am or something like that. So dont say we dont care becuse we do.

You really think there would have been so many viewers if Sweden had not played in the final?

Dosing 05-20-2012 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jussi (Post 49929755)
You really think there would have been so many viewers if Sweden had not played in the final?

Then it's a question of hockeyinterest period, not u20.

InjuredChoker 05-20-2012 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jussi (Post 49929755)
You really think there would have been so many viewers if Sweden had not played in the final?

I guess this applies to almost everything.

SirKillalot 05-20-2012 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Kanadensisk (Post 49926291)
I guess we know why Swedes don't care about the U20's then.

Well.

1. It's not a pro-tournament, it's a "kids" tournament. Thus only countries with real programs have a chance in the tournament.

2. The swedes have actually started to care recently because of two things:

- They have gotten some great hockey-programs(it's getting professionalized) and therefore more people follow.
- They have had a lot of bad luck in some tournaments, and the interest has gotten bigger because of major headlines and hope.

canuck2010 05-20-2012 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robin929 (Post 49925511)
Its not strange that so many canadiens doesnt care about it. They only have 6 goldmedals since 1960 so its not a real tournament :sarcasm:

I only wish we could have been playing a best of 7 with Sweden since 1960. That would have made for some really stimulating matches. Perhaps you wouldn't be playing hockey now! :laugh:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.