HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Chicago Blackhawks (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   Sign Vokoun, sign Jokinen to 1 year deals (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1196023)

Puckgenius* 05-25-2012 01:39 AM

Sign Vokoun, sign Jokinen to 1 year deals
 
2 UFAs that would be on fair deals this summer. vokoun could be had for 1.5-2.5 on a 1yr and Jokinen 2-3.5, he has stated hes willing to take a pay cut to sign with a top end contender. Hes getting old and doesnt have many years left but hes coming off a career year and was the flames best fwd this season. He would easily put up 60+ pts on the hawks second line.

Sign them both to 1 yr deals as stop gaps til Saad/Kruger and Salak can develop some more and fill those roles.

As much as id love J.Staal on the second line, i think hes too expensive. If you want Staal you will have to lose Sharp.

Rexy 05-25-2012 02:06 AM

for someone named puck genius, that's the stupidest thing I've read on HFboards in...well, a few hours.

oh, and Salak is not our guy of the future. I'll be surprised if he isn't in Europe next season. He took not making the team as an insult, and mailed it in while in Rockford before losing THAT job too.

Pepe Silvia 05-25-2012 02:18 AM

crawford can still have a great bounceback year. he's more than capable of playing good between the pipes. for this upcoming season, in crawford i trust.

if he's inconsistent and blows early on to mid way through the season, then you start lookin for goalies. i'd much rather the hawks spend the offseason lookin for a d-man and winger/center

Sevanston 05-25-2012 03:16 AM

Vokoun is going to the KHL.

Jokinen is a joke.

Bubba88 05-25-2012 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sevanston (Post 50122403)
Vokoun is going to the KHL.

Jokinen is a joke.

this

Vokoun will get more money in the KHL and Jokinen won't help us. He would not put up 60+ points as 2nd Line Center. This is fantasy and NHL12 thinking. 40-60 points is good for a 2nd line Center

HockeySensible 05-25-2012 07:23 AM

You don't win with Olli Jokinen.

xX Hot Fuss 05-25-2012 08:52 AM

Jokinen isn't a 60+ point 2C. There's only about 2 of those in the entire league

Hawkaholic 05-25-2012 09:12 AM

I wouldn't mind Jokinen, a lot better than having Kruger or Kane as our #2 C, and there aren't many better options out there than Olli.

A big NO to 37 y.o. Vokoun with a terrible groin.

massivegoonery 05-25-2012 10:14 AM

Sounds about right for a Bowman move - seemingly prudent, yet directionless and ineffective.

IU Hawks fan 05-25-2012 10:50 AM

Don't make any goalie changes this year.
Use this one to see if CC will be rookie year CC or last year CC.

If it's last year CC, then you throw the boat at Quick next summer.

Sarava 05-25-2012 11:08 AM

Don't want Vokoun, though I don't want to stake another full season on the chance that Crawford plays better. His seasons in Norfolk, Rockford and Chicago indicate to me he is more likely to be like the 2011-2012 Crawford than the 2010-2011 Crawford.

HockeySensible 05-25-2012 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarava (Post 50129433)
Don't want Vokoun, though I don't want to stake another full season on the chance that Crawford plays better. His seasons in Norfolk, Rockford and Chicago indicate to me he is more likely to be like the 2011-2012 Crawford than the 2010-2011 Crawford.

Another full season? What? You make Crawford sound like Steve Mason.

Sarava 05-25-2012 11:14 AM

He could be.

HockeySensible 05-25-2012 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarava (Post 50129601)
He could be.

Any goaltender who's not as good in their sophmore season as their rookie season "could be". The point is, you don't trade someone after a bad year.. especially not this past year, when the Hawks were awful defensively and on the PK.

Crawford's had one great year and one bad year, statsically. Now is not the time to move him.

Crazy_Ike 05-25-2012 11:25 AM

We're going to need SOMETHING in goal for sure, but whether or not Vokoun is the answer is questionable.

As for Jokinen...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crazy_Ike
Jokinen has never had any success anywhere he's played in the NHL.
He is inconsistent as hell.
He is brutal defensively.
He is as soft as toilet paper.
He can't win a faceoff to save his life.

This is the exact opposite of the sort of player we need. This is the sort of guy you get if you don't give a rat's arse about the things that actually cause teams to WIN.

No team - Hawks or otherwise - will ever go anywhere with this guy as a core component of the team (which certainly includes 2nd line center).

Just say no to Joke-inen. And maybe start avoiding players who come from long time losing franchises period. No more Leafs, Flames, etc.


Sarava 05-25-2012 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HossTheBoss (Post 50129899)
Any goaltender who's not as good in their sophmore season as their rookie season "could be". The point is, you don't trade someone after a bad year.. especially not this past year, when the Hawks were awful defensively and on the PK.

Crawford's had one great year and one bad year, statsically. Now is not the time to move him.

Plus he was average over the course of 5 seasons in Norfolk/Rockford. He has never finished a season with a .920 save % in 7 years as a professional. In fact, he has only finished above .910 save % two of those 7 seasons. There's no reason to think this past season was a fluke. 2010-2011 is more likely to be a fluke.

DisgruntledHawkFan 05-25-2012 11:59 AM

Jokinen as a plan D maybe. Plan F would be Kruger/Pirri. Vokoun was one of my favorite's, but time's getting to him.

HockeySensible 05-25-2012 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarava (Post 50130561)
Plus he was average over the course of 5 seasons in Norfolk/Rockford. He has never finished a season with a .920 save % in 7 years as a professional. In fact, he has only finished above .910 save % two of those 7 seasons. There's no reason to think this past season was a fluke. 2010-2011 is more likely to be a fluke.

If the Hawks play, even competent defense, Crawford would have posted back-to-back seasons with a SV% over .910.

There's more than a few examples of players/goaltenders who are better in the NHL than the AHL.. for alot of different reasons. Did you watch Norfolk/Rockford games when Crawford was there? Do you know how well those teams played defensively? The quality of chances they gave up and the frequency to which Crawford faced those chances?

If the Hawks play defense with any kind of structure or system Crawford will be fine. Start with covering the slot. Tying up/removing players in the crease. Basic stuff that most other teams do.

DisgruntledHawkFan 05-25-2012 12:15 PM

Goal is a very, very hard position to quantify statistically. Crawford shows flashes of solid play and this year has had stretches of bad play. Willing to give him another year, but after that I say go for the proven veteran upgrade if CC doesn't have a solid season.

digdug41982 05-25-2012 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DisgruntledHawkFan (Post 50131681)
Goal is a very, very hard position to quantify statistically. Crawford shows flashes of solid play and this year has had stretches of bad play. Willing to give him another year, but after that I say go for the proven veteran upgrade if CC doesn't have a solid season.

I don't know, the way Crawford looked start to finish both years is reflected very accurately in his save percentages both years, IMO. Same goes for Turco and Emery.

Sarava 05-25-2012 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HossTheBoss (Post 50131377)
If the Hawks play, even competent defense, Crawford would have posted back-to-back seasons with a SV% over .910.

There's more than a few examples of players/goaltenders who are better in the NHL than the AHL.. for alot of different reasons. Did you watch Norfolk/Rockford games when Crawford was there? Do you know how well those teams played defensively? The quality of chances they gave up and the frequency to which Crawford faced those chances?

If the Hawks play defense with any kind of structure or system Crawford will be fine. Start with covering the slot. Tying up/removing players in the crease. Basic stuff that most other teams do.

Didn't see the Norfolk games obviously, but I always watch as many Rockford games as possible. Crawford was very mediocre in Rockford the same year the Hawks won the cup. He was pretty close to what he was for the Hawks this season.

That's surely why the Hawks didn't even consider him for the starting job in 2010-2011...he just inherited it midway through when Turco stunk up the joint.

Rexy 05-25-2012 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarava (Post 50132149)
Didn't see the Norfolk games obviously, but I always watch as many Rockford games as possible. Crawford was very mediocre in Rockford the same year the Hawks won the cup. He was pretty close to what he was for the Hawks this season.

That's surely why the Hawks didn't even consider him for the starting job in 2010-2011...he just inherited it midway through when Turco stunk up the joint.

it's funny, that was the year he beat Niemi for the starting job in Chicago and got sent down anyway because it was less of a cap hit. Pending on when you saw him, if that's on your mind it can kill you (he had been rotting in the minors for what, 5 years? every year being told that next year was his chance)

Sarava 05-25-2012 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rexy (Post 50132383)
it's funny, that was the year he beat Niemi for the starting job in Chicago and got sent down anyway because it was less of a cap hit. Pending on when you saw him, if that's on your mind it can kill you (he had been rotting in the minors for what, 5 years? every year being told that next year was his chance)

Crawford and Niemi pretty much played to a deadbeat that year. I never heard anyone claim Crawford outplayed him that pre-season...until several have said this the past several weeks for some reason,

It was thought Niemi was kept on initially because of the game in Finland (remember the Hawks opened in Europe), in which he threw a shutout and solidified his position as Huet's backup. Also the Hawks risked losing Niemi if they sent him down, where Crawford they did not.

RomersWorld* 05-25-2012 01:12 PM

Jimmy Howard never really played outstanding in the AHL either.
He had SV% of .910, .911, .907, .916 compared to Crawford of .909, .907, .917, .909

So pretty similar. Not to mention them being drafted like 10 picks from each other. Hopefully they follow the same path in the NHL
Crawford Years:
1. .917 SV%
2. .903 SV%

Howard Years:
1. .924 SV%
2. .908 SV%
3. .920 SV%

So hopefully Crawford can get back to his .915-.920 SV% like Howard.

Lets not act like Niemi did so great in the AHL either. He had a .913 SV% in Rockford. Carter Hutton had a better SV% this year.

Sarava 05-25-2012 01:15 PM

I wasn't focusing solely on the AHL. I just wanted to point out that we have a lot more than Crawford's 2 seasons in Chicago to go by. He's actually been pretty consistent in his time in the Hawks organization.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.