HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Proposal: Edm-Chi (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1213057)

hextall86 06-21-2012 06:30 PM

Edm-Chi
 
Oilers ----> Pat Kane
Hawks ---> 1st overall ,Paajarvi ,Marincin

oilsands 06-21-2012 06:33 PM

I'm sorry..... but how about,

no.

Homesick 06-21-2012 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hextall86 (Post 51208459)
Oilers ----> Pat Kane
Hawks ---> 1st overall ,Paajarvi ,Marincin

Oilers say thanks but no thanks......quite easily

Kid Dynamite 06-21-2012 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hextall86 (Post 51208459)
Oilers ----> Pat Kane
Hawks ---> 1st overall ,Paajarvi ,Marincin

Is Chicago including a steak dinner because I hope they at least dine em before they **** them like that.

thadd 06-21-2012 06:38 PM

Both teams politely decline.

Edmonton isn't going to pay that much for a shrimp.
Chicago needs to win now.

BOUNCE 06-21-2012 06:40 PM

Kane = 1st overall

So we basically give Paajarvi and Marincin away for free?

Yakupov has the potential to be just as good or better then Pat Kane.

dookers9 06-21-2012 06:41 PM

No offense to Kane, a very skilled player, but ultimately his cost isn't worth it for the Oilers. Sure, he reunites with Gagner (for however that would last), but the Oilers need size, and there's still hope that Paajarvi can provide it - and some results.

If they're gonna go small, might as well make it with the top pick this year so as not to have to worry about Kane's paystub. I'sd say a firm no thanks.

SilverHaireDevil 06-21-2012 06:41 PM

shouldn't this go into the "all 1st overall pick" thread?

also
No to the OP.

TorstenFrings 06-21-2012 06:43 PM

Hrm, reports about the Oilers being ****ed all that hard in this seem a little exaggerated, but it is still pretty difficult to see the appeal of trading for another teeny tiny winger, i.e. the only thing they have enough of already.

xX Hot Fuss 06-21-2012 06:47 PM

I do think a Hall-RNH-Kane line would be the best in the world but it makes no sense to trade Yakupov+ for 2 years of Kane

Gootie 06-21-2012 06:47 PM

No thanks. I don't think either side touches this IRL.

Neatman 06-21-2012 06:48 PM

Absolutely no interest.
I wouldnt even be interested in Pat Kane straight up for the 1st overall.
Why? Because Yakupov brings a different playstyle that the Oilers need more of, they absolutely need his killer 1-timer because none of their forwards has one, and they'd prefer the younger player to the older. Pat Kane is clearly more proven and also there is no risk of "busting", but im willing to bet on Yakupov in that race.

WeridAl 06-21-2012 06:59 PM

Would mean Edmonton would have to hire a full time babysitter for Kane, best just pass.

5RingsAndABeer 06-21-2012 07:05 PM

I consider Yakupov to basically be equivalent to Kane in value.

Yakupov is younger and projects to be better (than current Kane, not pre-draft Kane), but is also an unproven commodity.

lakai17 06-21-2012 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BOUNCE (Post 51209121)
Kane = 1st overall

So we basically give Paajarvi and Marincin away for free?

Yakupov has the potential to be just as good or better then Pat Kane.

and you didn't even state the potential that Paajarvi or Marincin have.

I am a fan of Patrick Kane but he might be bad influence on some, plus he would probably want to play with his pal Sam.

RomersWorld* 06-21-2012 07:13 PM

So we trade Kane for a guy who might some day be as good as Kane. No thanks, plus I think Kane will always be the better player.

needle 06-21-2012 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lakai17 (Post 51210967)
and you didn't even state the potential that Paajarvi or Marincin have.

I am a fan of Patrick Kane but he might be bad influence on some, plus he would probably want to play with his pal Sam.

I love the word 'potential' in hockey. It means Jack Pooty.

WeridAl 06-21-2012 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RomersWorld (Post 51211103)
So we trade Kane for a guy who might some day be as good as Kane. No thanks, plus I think Kane will always be the better player.

By chance would that be in jail.:sarcasm:

jumptheshark 06-21-2012 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kratzbuerste (Post 51209299)
Hrm, reports about the Oilers being ****ed all that hard in this seem a little exaggerated, but it is still pretty difficult to see the appeal of trading for another teeny tiny winger, i.e. the only thing they have enough of already.

I have a rule.I never trade for players who party with my brother on a regular basis because I know how hard my brother parties

PADevil3034 06-21-2012 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrokeBackBulin (Post 51208715)
Is Chicago including a steak dinner because I hope they at least dine em before they **** them like that.

Nice, Cartman :laugh:

Johnny Bravo 06-21-2012 07:22 PM

This is very bad for Edmonton.

russ99 06-21-2012 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hextall86 (Post 51208459)
Oilers ----> Pat Kane
Hawks ---> 1st overall ,Paajarvi ,Marincin

Sure... Add Seabrook and you have a deal.

rockinghockey 06-21-2012 07:46 PM

That is a huge over payment, I would take Yak over him

longchange 06-21-2012 07:57 PM

Kane and the baggage he brings with his off-ice tomfoolery is the worst thing that could happen to a young impressionable team like the Oilers.

Ignoring that, the proposal is pretty terrible anyways imho.

Martini* 06-21-2012 08:48 PM

Only on this forum will you even think a player like Kane would be under valued over a prospect....just wow.

If Bowman called up the Oilers and offered Kane for the first, there is no doubt in my mind the Oilers would say yes then unplug the phone. You dont get players like Kane for potential, nope, not at all.

I also dont know why the Oilers would even want Kane, they have enough scoring already.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.