HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Proposal: NJ/Edmonton (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1224445)

Jerzey Devil 07-04-2012 06:10 PM

NJ/Edmonton
 
Something around any combination of Tallinder, Greene, Volchenkov (if he'll waive), Tedenby, Urbom, Burlon, or Gelinas...

...for any combination of Gagner, Omark, or Hemsky.

Add picks to either side if necessary.

5 14 6 1 07-04-2012 06:13 PM

What do you want for Volchenkov?

Volchenkov for Hemsky ? Straight Up?

Smid - Petry
Schultz - Schultz
Whitney - Volchenkov

oil4life14 07-04-2012 06:15 PM

Volchenkov for omark and 2nd?

Jerzey Devil 07-04-2012 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Hallidays (Post 52125151)
What do you want for Volchenkov?

Personally I'd like to package him for Gagner somehow but I don't know if other Devils fans would agree. I realize he's a center and as of right now we have Zajac, Henrique, Elias, Josefson, and Carter, but Elias is getting old (and he's a natural winger) and Zajac is a UFA next year. If he walks we're suddenly not looking so great at center. Plus it's easier to move a natural center to a wing while it's not as easy for a winger to mover to center. We just got lucky with Elias.

Marshal Rochambeau 07-04-2012 06:24 PM

Doubt Volchenkov ever waives to go to Edmonton. Tallinder or Greene seem more likely to get traded. Would love Hemsky but Gagner seems way more likely. Can he play right wing.

nzoilerfan 07-04-2012 06:27 PM

Gagner isn't really that available as we have not a lot of options for a another top six centre to come in.

I think Jersey could be a good place for Omark packaged with Peckham maybe for Volchenkov?

EDIT: I forgot he has a NTC, Greene would be a good option too.

MCDAVIDISH 07-04-2012 06:28 PM

I think Oilers would even overpay for a dman at this point, I'm not good with player values so im not gonna throw anything out there but I wouldn't be upset of we added a hit extra to get a guy like volchenkov or tallinder. Also wondering from NJ fans what they think about those two and where they'd it in our lineup.

KovalSNIPE 07-04-2012 06:32 PM

Tallinder + Greene + Gelinas + 2nd/3rd

for

Eberle + N. Schultz

Thoughts?

Jerzey Devil 07-04-2012 06:32 PM

How about...

To

:devils

Hemsky
Omark

To

:edmonton

Tallinder/Volch (if he'll waive)
Tedenby
Urbom/Gelinas/Burlon
2nd


* / = Or

Dick Whitman 07-04-2012 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nzoilerfan (Post 52125967)
Gagner isn't really that available as we have not a lot of options for a another top six centre to come in.

I think Jersey could be a good place for Omark packaged with Peckham maybe for Volchenkov?

EDIT: I forgot he has a NTC, Greene would be a good option too.

Why would a stanley cup finalist want 4th liners and minor leaguers from one of the worst teams in the league in exchange for one of their best defensive dmen?

How does this benefit *both* teams?

nzoilerfan 07-04-2012 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kovalsnipe (Post 52126219)
tallinder + greene + gelinas + 2nd/3rd

for

eberle + n. Schultz

thoughts?


your not serious?

nzoilerfan 07-04-2012 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dick Whitman (Post 52126265)
Why would a stanley cup finalist want 4th liners and minor leaguers from one of the worst teams in the league in exchange for one of their best defensive dmen?

How does this benefit *both* teams?

Hmmm, yea that's a lowball offer, Hemsky for Greene+ ?

nzoilerfan 07-04-2012 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerzey Devil (Post 52126245)
How about...

To

:devils

Hemsky
Omark

To

:edmonton

Tallinder/Volch (if he'll waive)
Tedenby
Urbom/Gelinas/Burlon
2nd


* / = Or

I would probably do that if its Urbom.

McDoused 07-04-2012 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KovalSNIPE (Post 52126219)
Tallinder + Greene + Gelinas + 2nd/3rd

for

Eberle + N. Schultz

Thoughts?

This gave me a good laugh :)

Zubrus Coffee Maker 07-04-2012 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerzey Devil (Post 52126245)
How about...

To

:devils

Hemsky
Omark

To

:edmonton

Tallinder/Volch (if he'll waive)
Tedenby
Urbom/Gelinas/Burlon
2nd


* / = Or

Why does Omark have value?

Jerzey Devil 07-04-2012 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tairy Greene (Post 52126513)
maybe toss in Larsson there...

It's a slight overpayment but it's not that bad. Maybe change the 2nd to a 3rd.

Tallinder
Urbom
tedenby
3rd

for

Hemsky
Omark

oil4life14 07-04-2012 06:42 PM

Yakupov for larsson+

Zubrus Coffee Maker 07-04-2012 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerzey Devil (Post 52126575)
It's a slight overpayment but it's not that bad. Maybe change the 2nd to a 3rd.

Tallinder
Urbom
tedenby
3rd

for

Hemsky
Omark

sorry, meant to quote the Eberle proposal. i was hoping no one saw my screw up:laugh:

Jerzey Devil 07-04-2012 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tairy Greene (Post 52126855)
sorry, meant to quote the Eberle proposal. i was hoping no one saw my screw up:laugh:

That's cool.

I think Omark and Tedenby have equal value and neither one has been very impressive for their current teams. Those two are basically a swap leaving Tallinder, Urbom and 3rd for Hemsky.

Koto 07-04-2012 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KovalSNIPE (Post 52126219)
Tallinder + Greene + Gelinas + 2nd/3rd

for

Eberle + N. Schultz

Thoughts?

what the hell is this...

rockinghockey 07-04-2012 06:53 PM

Eberle will never be moved. NEVER

xX Hot Fuss 07-04-2012 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Hallidays (Post 52125151)
What do you want for Volchenkov?

Volchenkov for Hemsky ? Straight Up?

Smid - Petry
Schultz - Schultz
Whitney - Volchenkov

Volchenkov would NOT be a 3rd pairing D man. Especially not on the Oilers pathetic D core.

Zubrus Coffee Maker 07-04-2012 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xX Hot Fuss (Post 52127955)
Volchenkov would NOT be a 3rd pairing D man. Especially not on the Oilers pathetic D core.

he was on our third pairing once we got deep into the playoffs

Bobby12345 07-04-2012 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tairy Greene (Post 52126513)
Why does Omark have value?

Because one time he did a nifty move during a shootout... :naughty:

Marshal Rochambeau 07-04-2012 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oil4life14 (Post 52126771)
Yakupov for larsson+

Considered.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.