HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Columbus Blue Jackets (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Prospect Info: 2013 NHL Draft Thread (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1242547)

Sore Loser 08-06-2012 10:28 PM

2013 NHL Draft Thread
 
I know it's early and all, but I figured that since now is the time I start my hockey prospect season, it would be a good opportunity to start the NHL Draft thread for next year. With three first round picks as of this post, the Jackets are certainly going to be paying major attention to the top prospects for the draft. With Team Canada naming their under-18 team for the Ivan Hlinka tournament today (which runs August 13-18), here are the guys that made the team, and will certainly be worth following:

http://www.whl.ca/uploads/assets/WHL...U18_roster.pdf

Certainly, this is by no means a list of the top prospects available for the upcoming draft, and clearly there are some very important names that you won't find on the list; such as Seth Jones (USA), Hunter Shinkaruk, Sean Monahan (late birthdays/not eligible), amongst others.

I know this doesn't appeal to all of you, but if you're a hockey fan you might enjoy keeping tabs on it, as there isn't typically much going on in the world of hockey in August. I'll be following the tournament very closely as usual, as it's really my first opportunity to see all of these kids compete against each other on a meaningful basis. If anyone has any questions about the tournament or the players involved, I'll be glad to provide as many answers as I can. I'll also be keeping very close tabs on each and every one of these players (particularly the WHLers) as each player's season gets under way.

Viqsi 08-06-2012 10:46 PM

Would be awesome to hear analysis, at least. I figured out long ago that my amateur scouting ability in any sport - in the absence of any other data coming from other folks that I can analyze and compare - consists entirely of wishful thinking and homerism. ;)

pete goegan 08-07-2012 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Viqsi (Post 53341035)
I figured out long ago that my amateur scouting ability in any sport - in the absence of any other data coming from other folks that I can analyze and compare - consists entirely of wishful thinking and homerism. ;)

Same here, Viqsi. At least in part, that's why I don't participate in the Prospect Poll.

LetsGOJackets!! 08-07-2012 08:47 AM

None of us are scouts
 
Many don't get to see the kids play to much in Jr., so opinions are made during four days of camp after the draft, and youtube clips or other media.

With that said Pete does it even matter? Why not participate?

Thanks Sore Loser for the thread: good to have a knowlegeable poster thinking a head

pete goegan 08-07-2012 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LetsGOJackets!! (Post 53347493)
With that said Pete does it even matter? Why not participate?

No, of course it doesn't matter, and I'm rarely reluctant to voice my opinion on most subjects, but I don't have enough knowledge about the prospects to even form an opinion. I certainly enjoy the discussion of prospect by those with knowledge of their potential. I also have no problem with those who express their opinion based on whatever criteria they choose - clips, camps, signs of the Zodiac, eye color, etc. - I just don't like to post on subjects about which I know nothing. I also don't usually do predictions. That's just me, though, everyone follows their own path. That's one of the things I enjoy, here.

Monk 08-07-2012 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pete goegan (Post 53346085)
Same here, Viqsi. At least in part, that's why I don't participate in the Prospect Poll.

I vote for the first 4 or 5, which tend to be a general consensus anyway, and then my knowledge runs out. Maybe I should just stop as well :laugh:

CBJBrassard16 08-07-2012 01:03 PM

Can't go wrong with Mackinnon, Barkov, or Jones

cslebn 08-07-2012 01:16 PM

As someone who doesn't get a chance to follow these tournaments due to time I love hearing opinions of those that do watch.

I'd be especially curious to hear how Darnell Nurse, Nick Ritchie, Bo Horvat and Kayle Doetzel do. And I'm solely basing that off their size. Ritchie's listed as 6'2" 218 lbs. That's a big 16 year old.

Sore Loser 08-07-2012 01:36 PM

Love the honesty guys, you're making me blush :laugh:

I've followed junior hockey very closely since my move to Spokane in 2003. Around about 2005, I started doing my own little notebooks on players and was picked up by TSR in 2009. Since then, my knowledge has expanded tenfold as it's given me more reason to follow guys from all around the world. I do the best I can on limited resources - the Spokane Chiefs have little idea who I even am (save a couple of people, which is how I want to keep it), so I don't get a press pass or anything. I do my scouting just by watching with my wife and two daughters.

It's a really enjoyable hobby more than anything, and I'm always happy to share my opinions.

Nathan MacKinnon is looking very good for Team Canada thus far, as expected. If he doesn't lead the team in scoring for the tournament I'll be somewhat surprised. Really, there are always nay-sayers when a guy stands out this much (Crosby vs. Brule, Tavares vs. Duchene, etc), but in most circumstances, even when the other players on that level do turn out very well, the player that stood out from the beginning always prevails. I truly believe Nathan MacKinnon, if he stays healthy, will be the #1 guy from wire to wire this year. Seth Jones, Sean Monahan, and Hunter Shinkaruk will all make pushes, but MacKinnon has some star quality to him that will ultimately make him too attractive to pass up at #1. If at all possible, we have to land this player at the draft.

Here's an article from TSN on him:

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=402250

Quote:

In much the same way that Sidney Crosby reinforced his status as a No. 1 overall pick in the 2005 NHL Entry Draft, 16-year-old phenom Nathan MacKinnon has a chance to strengthen his own case as the top draft-eligible player next summer when the Ivan Hlinka Memorial Tournament kicks off next week.

Viqsi 08-07-2012 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pete goegan (Post 53346085)
Same here, Viqsi. At least in part, that's why I don't participate in the Prospect Poll.

I justify my time there by reading scouting reports. As many as I can find. I can't do scouting myself, but I can analyze and cross-check other people's scouting.

candyman82 08-07-2012 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Viqsi (Post 53358061)
I justify my time there by reading scouting reports. As many as I can find. I can't do scouting myself, but I can analyze and cross-check other people's scouting.

I'm in that boat. I also try to watch highlights of players as well as highlights of other players that they are on the ice for, just so I can see them at their worst as well. It isn't much, but it's a chance to see bits and pieces

Sore Loser 08-08-2012 05:57 PM

http://www.hockeycanada.ca/index.php...67/la_id/1.htm

The HC link to the Ivan Hlinka tournament. This lists the entire schedule for the tournament, including times.

Also worth noting, anyone interested in seeing Hunter Shinkaruk can actually catch him in the Summit Series (CHL players vs. Russian players); along with Ryan Murray. Some blurbs on the WHL guys competing for Canada:

http://www.whl.ca/article/whl-stars-...lls-for-canada

ThisIsMyAlibi 08-08-2012 07:32 PM

wahsnairb has been touting (the highly touted) Jones for months.

EspenK 08-08-2012 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThisIsMyAlibi (Post 53399071)
wahsnairb has been touting (the highly touted) Jones for months.

while jones is definitely highly touted if the Jackets draft him, I'll be amazed and peed off. They need another D prospect like they need Steve Mason to sign a 5 year extension. Offense, offense, offense.

Sore Loser 08-08-2012 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThisIsMyAlibi (Post 53399071)
wahsnairb has been touting (the highly touted) Jones for months.

Quote:

Originally Posted by EspenK (Post 53399233)
while jones is definitely highly touted if the Jackets draft him, I'll be amazed and peed off. They need another D prospect like they need Steve Mason to sign a 5 year extension. Offense, offense, offense.

...I agree with Espen, though not to the same extent ;)

If we wind up in the 4-6 range at the draft, as is a possibility, I certainly think that if he is on the board and some of the bigger name forwards are gone, Seth Jones might be a possibility. I'm really interested to see him compete in the WHL - he's going to be on a very talented team in Portland (though, admittedly, they're losing some major pieces). If he's going to maintain his top prospect status, he will have to be absolutely dominant and prove that he's not only able to play on that team, but capable of being a leader on that team (especially since this is already his 18 year old season).

There's no doubting the kid can play, but everyone thought the same thing about Nick Ebert heading into this year ... really, anything can happen, especially when a kid is coming into a new situation altogether.

With the top end offensive talent in this draft and three first round picks, even if we do wind up with Seth Jones with our first pick, the other two picks should net us high quality prospects. A guy like Curtis Lazar could shoot up the rankings, or if he holds true where he is, he'll be a guy that's definitely worth snagging up. He's already got a pro frame and competes extremely well in all three zones. He could be a smaller version of Ryan Kesler. If we wound up with a player like that in the mid/late first round, along with Seth Jones, I don't think anyone can be disappointed.

Asher 08-08-2012 11:30 PM

You'll probably get MacKinnon. He's supposed to be the best player in the draft since Crosby.

CBJBrassard16 08-09-2012 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Asher (Post 53405455)
you'll probably get MacKinnon. He's supposed to be the best player in the draft since Crosby.

Oh really?

wahsnairb 08-09-2012 12:25 AM

As was previously mentioned, I wish more than anything we get Jones, but that may not be the smart pick the way our team is starting to heavily favor the back end.

If the draft was today, you take Mack with the #1 pick regardless of what you need and I don't see that changing; I also don't see us playing the worst hockey in the NHL next season.. unfortunately.

If we pick 2 today it is still Jones and then forwards with the other picks or package to get one we love.

Sore Loser 08-09-2012 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Asher (Post 53405455)
You'll probably get MacKinnon. He's supposed to be the best player in the draft since Tavares.

Fixed. Don't want everyone here to get their hopes too high. Sid is a special player, Tavares is a more realistic comparison.

Asher 08-09-2012 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CBJBrassard16 (Post 53406507)
Oh really?

No offense intended by that comment, but I do think CBus finishes last this year. It's worth it to get MacKinnon IMO. Franchise centers are almost impossible to get, especially ones this good.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sore Loser (Post 53406631)
Fixed. Don't want everyone here to get their hopes too high. Sid is a special player, Tavares is a more realistic comparison.

Duly noted.

EspenK 08-09-2012 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Asher (Post 53406827)
No offense intended by that comment, but I do think CBus finishes last this year. It's worth it to get MacKinnon IMO. Franchise centers are almost impossible to get, especially ones this good.

You just don't understand Jacket luck and Jacket fan mentality. Like fans of the hapless Cubs, Jacket fans believe every year is the year that potentials will be reached, injuries avoided, other teams will collapse, chemistry will appear and coaching and upper management will finally make great decisions (okay, maybe we don't think mgt is capable of that) and the playoffs beckon.

When reality sets in and the Jackets finish last or close, we just know that we'll hear Gary Bettman say "the winner if the 20xx draft lottery is .....The Edmonton Oilers" :sarcasm:

Personally I'd love to get MacKinnon, even if it means finishing last again.

EspenK 08-09-2012 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sore Loser (Post 53400947)
...I agree with Espen, though not to the same extent ;)

If we wind up in the 4-6 range at the draft, as is a possibility, I certainly think that if he is on the board and some of the bigger name forwards are gone, Seth Jones might be a possibility. I'm really interested to see him compete in the WHL - he's going to be on a very talented team in Portland (though, admittedly, they're losing some major pieces). If he's going to maintain his top prospect status, he will have to be absolutely dominant and prove that he's not only able to play on that team, but capable of being a leader on that team (especially since this is already his 18 year old season).

There's no doubting the kid can play, but everyone thought the same thing about Nick Ebert heading into this year ... really, anything can happen, especially when a kid is coming into a new situation altogether.

With the top end offensive talent in this draft and three first round picks, even if we do wind up with Seth Jones with our first pick, the other two picks should net us high quality prospects. A guy like Curtis Lazar could shoot up the rankings, or if he holds true where he is, he'll be a guy that's definitely worth snagging up. He's already got a pro frame and competes extremely well in all three zones. He could be a smaller version of Ryan Kesler. If we wound up with a player like that in the mid/late first round, along with Seth Jones, I don't think anyone can be disappointed.

Good response. If the Jones has the year everyone expects and he is available at 4-6 I guess taking him would be okay, but I'd still strongly consider trading down a spot or two if the deal was right.
I 'm not 100% sold on taking the BPA, especially when you are pretty deep at a position.

Possible slogan: "Jackets are Jonesing" to go along with "No winnin' for MacKinnon". Still working on a slogan for Shinkaruk - "With luck its Shinkaruk" ? :laugh:

pete goegan 08-09-2012 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EspenK (Post 53409097)
Good response. If the Jones has the year everyone expects and he is available at 4-6 I guess taking him would be okay, but I'd still strongly consider trading down a spot or two if the deal was right.
I 'm not 100% sold on taking the BPA, especially when you are pretty deep at a position.

Possible slogan: "Jackets are Jonesing" to go along with "No winnin' for MacKinnon". Still working on a slogan for Shinkaruk - "With luck its Shinkaruk" ? :laugh:

"Suck for Shinkaruk"?

EspenK 08-09-2012 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pete goegan (Post 53409173)
"Suck for Shinkaruk"?

That could work :nod:

Double-Shift Lassť 08-09-2012 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EspenK (Post 53409049)
You just don't understand Jacket luck and Jacket fan mentality. Like fans of the hapless Cubs, Jacket fans believe every year is the year that potentials will be reached, injuries avoided, other teams will collapse, chemistry will appear and coaching and upper management will finally make great decisions (okay, maybe we don't think mgt is capable of that) and the playoffs beckon.

That's funny. I thought Jacket fan mentality was "We're going to suck and be terrible this year, probably finish last again, but, like always, lose the draft lottery and still not get our guy. Oh woe is me."


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.