![]() |
Van/Chi then Van/Was
Niklas Hjalmarsson, Corey Crawford, 1st rounder
- Keith Ballard, Roberto Luongo Jeff Schultz, Michal Neuvirth, 1st rounder - Corey Crawford, Niklas Hjalmarsson Chicago gets a top flight goalie and a dman who would be #4 or 5 on depth chart.. Washington gets an upgrade in goal and on defense and gets rid of Schultz.. Vancouver gets cap space and picks, while still retaining a backup and a 6th dman.. |
Chicago is giving up way too much
|
I didn't know the Hawks were taking on other team's cap dumps. Luongo would be an upgrade but no way and I mean no way in hell are we taking on Ballard's contract and that is on top of what we are giving up in the first place. Thanks but no thanks.
I am guessing Caps fans wont be happy with the second deal. Crawford's value is an all time low. |
So Luongo, Ballard for 2 late 1sts, Jeff Schultz, and Neuvirth.
Personally I'd rather have Ballard than Schultz, and Neuvirth doesn't realy fill a need if Lack is capable. Value isn't bad, but I'd rather have an NHL ready prospect who can challenge for a top 6 role i top 6 forwards are of the table. |
Caps are set in goal. They're going to let Holtby sink or swim.
|
Terrible deal for the Canucks.
|
Quote:
|
What's the incentive for Vancouver to do this, besides downgrading at every position to get a 1st rounder?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I still like the offer some Leaf fans were okay with in Kadri, Lombardi, 1st. |
For reference...
Vancouver gives up: Keith Ballard, Roberto Luongo Vancouver gets: Jeff Schultz, Michal Neuvirth, CHI 1st, WAS 1st I think the problem here is that Crawford for Neuvirth is a Bad Move for Washington. Their goaltending already has too many question marks, and that just adds more. It's otherwise shockingly close to reasonable IMO. I'm kind of surprised. I imagine Nucks fans would want more back for Lou, but I'm not sure if that's going to happen. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This is bad. Vancouver has no interest in this, even though Neuvirth seems like a legit young goalie, Washington should have no interest in this with their goaltending situation, and Chicago should have no interest, despite IMO them getting more then they give. Bad all around, our humblest apologies to the other fanbases.
|
Van might have interest but makes no sense for the others.
|
Quote:
Luongo has also been horribly inconsistent in the playoffs, a time when we would need him the most. Chicago is not a fringe playoff team that needs a good regular season goalie to carry us into the playoffs. We need a goalie who has shown more of a backbone than Luongo has. |
Quote:
Also, FYI, Luongo's playoff save percentage is 20th all time, just EDIT three spots below Lundqvist, and one above Rinne. |
Quote:
I would much rather keep an elite goalie than dump him for unused cap space, some meh players, and a couple late firsts. |
FYI Luongo has been PULLED from
PLAYOFF games about 4 times in the past 3 years. Chicago needs a playoff goalie, not one of carries us into a #2 seed |
Quote:
|
People know Ballards cap hit is 4.2 right?
That's about 400-600,000 overpaid. Based on his play so far. Honestly if be was paid 3.75 no one would complain and everyone would say he serves his purpose. It seems like people think be has an atrocious contract. Is he overpaid? Yes, but not by a large margin. Also why would Ballard be a cap dump? He's still a puck carrying dman who at times plays like a 3/4 guy but some nights at worst he's a number 5 who has one giveaway. |
Washington gets an upgrade in goal and on defense and gets rid of Schultz..
Crawfor is NOT an upgrade. Losing Schulltz is good but just cut him. |
No interest in trading anything of value to get Luongo, let alone adding more to trade for Ballard who can't even hold down a top 4 spot on Vancouvers defense.
Hjalmarsson >Ballard Crawford +1st > Luongos value |
Canuck fans defend and say why its a bad deal when the opposite teams no! Joking...but Seriously expecting Chi to take on 10 mill in salary for just an upgrade in net? Ridiculous, Hammer is better then Ballard, Lou then Crawford, and the 1st is dumb. SeriouslyHammer abd a 1st for Lou is more then fair. But this a real real bad trade for all parties involved. Van included.
|
Quote:
But I agree none of the teams do it. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.