HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Minnesota Wild (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   Aleksander Barkov (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1267069)

SphinX 10-04-2012 10:19 AM

Aleksander Barkov
 
http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=50044

This is a player i would be really happy to be pickin up in next years draft!

He is eligible for the first time next year and has already 12 points and 7! goals in 8 games.. (In SM-Liiga!)

This is most likely to be a top 5 pick imo.

Any thoughts?

HobeyBroten 10-04-2012 10:46 AM

Impressive so far. Lets see if he plateaus off and stays at a pt./gm. or more pace or if he goes back down to where he was in years past. A little early for me to go tossing him into top 5 in 2013 draft. But at 17, he is definitely on the radar and will be put under the microscope for the entire year.

Dee Oh Cee 10-04-2012 11:03 AM

Only chance we'd have would be if the lockout went the entire season and then we got a little lucky with the draft lottery.

Victorious Secret 10-04-2012 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dee Oh Cee (Post 54760587)
Only chance we'd have would be if the lockout went the entire season and then we got a little lucky with the draft lottery.

Which wouldn't be too farfetched. I wouldn't be surpriseda bit if we got top 10. Obviously, a little if we were top 5 or higher.

Honestly, I don't know whether we'd go for another elite forward talent or shore up the defense. I guess it depends on too many things.



On Barkov, what has failed to be mentioned is that he already has an NHL body. TSN has him listed at 6 foot 2 inches and 205 pounds. Thats pretty set already, undoubtedly he will gain more throughout his career.

HobeyBroten 10-04-2012 11:19 AM

Check this out regarding our position for 2013 draft if season is canceled.

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrolikFan67 (Post 54361297)
since a lot of people think that the way it would be weighted in the case of a lockout may be a little unfair, perhaps give less balls to teams like pittsburgh for being very good and a team like the oilers because of all the 1st overalls, for fun, i decided to make my own weighting scale. it would take forever to see how many balls every team would have and then punch it in on the draft website, but if anyone would like to see how many balls they'd have with my scale please post it, i'd love to see if it ended up being more on the fair side: first calculate how many points on average your team has earned in the last 5 years to determine how many balls they begin with...

60-69pts = 4 balls
70-79pts = 3 balls
80-89pts = 2 balls
90-99+pts = 1 ball
this will determine where you start off at.

add additional balls if you fit the following:
if youve missed the playoffs 3 times in the last 5 years, add 1 ball
if youve missed the playoffs 4 times in the last 5 years, add 2 balls
if youve missed the playoffs 5 times in the last 5 years, add 3 balls

after that, we'll subtract balls if you fit the following:
however many times a team has had a 1st overall in the last 5 years, they lose that many balls (ex. oilers lose 3)
any team that has made the playoffs 3+ times in the last 5 years loses 1 ball
any team that has won the stanley cup in the last 5 years loses 2 balls

this will give you your final ball count. the lowest you can have is 1 (ex. if your down to 2 balls and youve won the stanley cup in the past 5 years or any of the other ways to lose balls, you go down to 1, not 0).

panthers would have 4 balls with this system. started off w/ 2, received an additional 2 for missing the playoffs 4 times in past 5 seasons, lost none.


Based on other threads I have been checking out, we would get 4 balls based on above system math done below.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Viqsi (Post 54363877)
I opted to just figure it for everybody, since I just happened to have points percentage charts already open for unrelated reasons. :D



Results so far:
3 balls - Columbus, Edmonton, Long Island, Winnipeg
2 balls - Carolina, Colorado, Florida, LA, Minnesota, Ottawa, Tampa Bay, Toronto
1 ball - Everyone else.



3 balls added to Edmonton, Long Island, Toronto, Winnipeg.
2 balls added to Columbus, Dallas, Florida, Minnesota, Tampa Bay
1 ball added to Buffalo, Calgary, Carolina, Colorado, St. Louis
All else lose 1 ball per the rules below.*



1st overall picks: Long Island, Tampa Bay, Edmonton (x3).
3+ playoff appearances: see above.
Stanley Cups: Detroit, Pittsburgh, Chicago, Boston, LA.



Based on this system...
6 balls (9.1% chance of 1st overall): Winnipeg
5 balls (7.5%): Columbus, Long Island, Toronto
4 balls (6.1%): Florida, Minnesota
3 balls (4.5%): Carolina, Colorado, Dallas, Tampa Bay, Edmonton
2 balls (3%): Buffalo, Calgary, St. Louis
1 ball (1.5%): Ottawa
"0 balls" (actually 1): Anaheim, Montreal, Nashville, New Jersey, New York (owned by CBJ), Philadelphia, Phoenix, San Jose, Vancouver, Washington.
"-1 balls" (actually 1): Los Angeles (owned by CBJ)
"-2 balls" (actually 1): Boston, Chicago, Detroit, Pittsburgh
GRAND TOTAL: 66 balls.


Victorious Secret 10-04-2012 11:22 AM

Those are peoples own formulas. If this was the same as the last lockout it will be max. 3 balls.

HobeyBroten 10-04-2012 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victorious Secret (Post 54760999)
Those are peoples own formulas. If this was the same as the last lockout it will be max. 3 balls.

Well that sucks...:shakehead

Victorious Secret 10-04-2012 11:24 AM

I'm for it if it gets Minnesota more balls.

Billy Mays Here 10-04-2012 11:50 AM

Not expecting us to win it but a top 5 pick would be awesome.

forthewild 10-04-2012 12:16 PM

Another fin to keep an eye on is radmus ristolinen (sp) he is a 6'02 dman eligible for the draft

Generic User 10-04-2012 12:27 PM

Barkov reminds me of JVR a bit. Great size, great at scoring goals at this point in their careers... But I'd rather take one of MacKinnon, Jones, Monahan, Shinkaruk, Nichushkin, or Pulock over Barkov at this point. Could change, though. Not set-in-stone against him or anything.. I just don't see anything special that lots of others are seeing.

TZM 10-04-2012 12:45 PM

He's got the size and the skill but he lacks speed and explosiveness. I've followed him close this season and he looks good for a 17 year-old kid in SM-liiga. I'd say he's a top3 pick if he avoids injuries.

Victorious Secret 10-04-2012 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Generic User (Post 54762361)
Barkov reminds me of JVR a bit. Great size, great at scoring goals at this point in their careers... But I'd rather take one of MacKinnon, Jones, Monahan, Shinkaruk, Nichushkin, or Pulock over Barkov at this point. Could change, though. Not set-in-stone against him or anything.. I just don't see anything special that lots of others are seeing.

Whaaaaaaa?

Generic User 10-04-2012 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victorious Secret (Post 54763471)
Whaaaaaaa?

I think he gon' be a player. Probably won't touch him because he's Russian.. But his hands, shot and skating are slick.

Here's a decent highlight video of him:


Victorious Secret 10-04-2012 01:44 PM

I'll take an NHL-ready Barkov over a lanky Valeri any day.

Pajicz 10-04-2012 01:44 PM

Tomorrow going to see Barkov playing live first time this season, when his team Tappara is hosting Jokerit (featuring V. Filppula and Erik Karlsson). Hopefully he'll put up some points again...

Puhis 10-04-2012 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by forthewild (Post 54762105)
Another fin to keep an eye on is radmus ristolinen (sp) he is a 6'02 dman eligible for the draft

That misspelling was glorious :laugh: It's Rasmus Ristolainen ;)

But then again, if you'd ask me to spell a Czech/Slovakian/Russian name, the result would be similar.

urho 10-04-2012 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HobeyBroten (Post 54760307)
A little early for me to go tossing him into top 5 in 2013 draft.

Something dramatic has to happen if he falls out of top 5. He's quite firmly at 3rd place right now, that said knowing this'll be a very deep draft year...

Barkov is a huge humanbeing, an elite playmaker who'll be able to score too. I like how most of his goals come from the dirty areas. Some say he's got almost datsyukian hands... While that's a bit too much to say, it tells you something about his offensive abilities. Some say that he could be the first Finnish player to be drafted first overall. If he keeps scoring the way(well, I doubt he can) he is right now, that'll be the case.

For his age, he's excellent defensively as well. It's really hard to compare him to any current NHLer but he reminds me a bit of Joe Thornton. Even Mikko Koivu comes to mind when I think of some aspects of his game.

...and did I say that he's a huge humanbeing?
http://www.tappara.fi/liiga/componen...1626006688.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/nXxJf.jpg
The guy on the right is a former nhler Ville Nieminen, who isn't the smallest guy either.

If they don't play this season... Well, he's not going to be picked by Minnesota.

Welcome to Hurricanes, Sasha! :sarcasm:

Tuomaz 10-04-2012 02:15 PM

Koivu,Granlund,Barkov,Brodziak too much :sarcasm:

Minnesota 10-04-2012 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victorious Secret (Post 54761027)
I'm for it if it gets Minnesota more balls.

What are you trying to say? :naughty:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victorious Secret (Post 54764251)
I'll take an NHL-ready Barkov over a lanky Valeri any day.

Would you trade Brodin for Strome or Zibanejad?

Obviously not the same players, but NHL-readiness isn't one of my top factors for drafting players high in the first round.

Puhis 10-04-2012 02:27 PM

If we draft him, he'll turn into James Sheppard 2.0. Book on it.

W75 10-04-2012 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxwell Goldshadow (Post 54765387)
If we draft him, he'll turn into James Sheppard 2.0. Book on it.

No, nooo. That's Joel Armia. Or maybe Armia is Ville Leino 2.0 :naughty:

Victorious Secret 10-04-2012 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minnesota (Post 54765159)
What are you trying to say? :naughty:



Would you trade Brodin for Strome or Zibanejad?

Obviously not the same players, but NHL-readiness isn't one of my top factors for drafting players high in the first round.

Obviously Brodin, since hes my favorite prospect.

I suppose. But considering I haven't seen Valeri Can'tspellhislastname in many or any top pre-season top 10 lists I'll stick with Barkov for now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxwell Goldshadow (Post 54765387)
If we draft him, he'll turn into James Sheppard 2.0. Book on it.

Save the BuzzKillington bit for Wildhockeyfan.

Generic User 10-04-2012 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victorious Secret (Post 54765577)
Obviously Brodin, since hes my favorite prospect.

I suppose. But considering I haven't seen Valeri Can'tspellhislastname...

Easier to say than spell. Ha.

"Nick-oosh-kin"

Victorious Secret 10-04-2012 02:38 PM

If I say it I don't think you'll hear me.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.