HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Value of: Seabrook and Yandle (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1269025)

ALI 10-08-2012 04:06 PM

Seabrook and Yandle
 
what would it cost for either of them.

Vankiller Whale 10-08-2012 04:08 PM

Teams aren't going to downgrade their defense for what are basically scraps(and especially not add Gormley).

I doubt Seabrook is available, but Yandle would probably cost a top line forward.

Leafs For Life* 10-08-2012 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale (Post 54850369)
Teams aren't going to downgrade their defense for what are basically scraps(and especially not add Gormley).

I doubt Seabrook is available, but Yandle would probably cost a top line forward.

Under 30.

Avs44 10-08-2012 04:17 PM

Not going to get either of them on the Flames for what you have available. Teams are not going to want a downgrade like your originaly posted for literally nothing, you have no younger top line forwards, and I doubt Flames would move Baertschi.

zytz 10-08-2012 06:25 PM

I don't think the flames could get Seabrook for anything, tbh

For anyone else it would have to be a 2d and a 2c to Chicago ... legit #2 guys at those positions like Goligoski / Kronwall at D and Richards / Pavelski / Staal at C

Chicago is in a unique position possessing two number 1 d-men, they would need to truly fill holes in order to move Seabrook.

Zippy316 10-08-2012 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALI (Post 54850323)
what would it cost for either of them.

Unless you do a lateral move:

Seabrook would probably cost you a number two center or a second pairing defender, a pretty good prospect, and a first. If second pairing defender, than add another prospect.

Yandle will probably cost an offensive forward with promise, a serviceable second pairing defender, and a first.

For hypotheticals, doesn't mean these teams trade for them, just saying the most reasonable deals....

Seabrook for Zajac, Merrill, and a first.

Yandle for Johanssen, Schultz, and a first.

rt 10-08-2012 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALI (Post 54850323)
what would it cost for either of them.

You are a Flames fan, right? For Yandle I'd need Sven Baertschi and your 2013 1st, for starters.

HockeySensible 10-08-2012 07:34 PM

Seabrook is simply not available.

longchange 10-08-2012 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rt (Post 54854763)
You are a Flames fan, right? For Yandle I'd need Sven Baertschi and your 2013 1st, for starters.

Out of curiosity, how would you feel about J-Bo, Baertschi and 2013 2nd?

HockeySensible 10-08-2012 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by longchange (Post 54856661)
Out of curiosity, how would you feel about J-Bo, Baertschi and 2013 2nd?

Pretty sure Phoenix is the last team that would want to take on J-Bo's contract.

rt 10-08-2012 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HossTheBoss (Post 54856715)
Pretty sure Phoenix is the last team that would want to take on J-Bo's contract.

If the league starts by the Winter Classic (unfortunately that's pretty much the best case scenario at this point) then the Yotes would only be on the hook for 1.5yrs of it. Plus, there might be a potential roll back.

Still, I don't really expect Calgary to make the playoffs (not saying it's out of the question or anything), so that 1st that I added to Baertschi is actually a huge part of the proposal, especially considering how loaded this draft is with scoring forwards.

Leafs For Life* 10-08-2012 09:12 PM

Baertchsi+Gio?

DontToewzMeBro 10-09-2012 08:35 AM

Chicago offers Pheonix
Nick Leddy,Stalberg,Morin 1st
For Yandle and 2nd

Chicago D is incredible

Keith-Seabrook
Yandle-Hjarlmasson
Oduya-Brookbank

rt 10-09-2012 09:06 AM

^ Pat Kane or GTFO.

Hawkaholic 10-09-2012 09:08 AM

Seabrook is not available.

But for the sake of the thread, if you really want him in Calgary.

Gio, Bartschi, and 1st.

rt 10-09-2012 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leaffan16 (Post 54857473)
Baertchsi+Gio?

That is an extremely tempting offer. However, I think we'd rather have Gio's value replaced by equal forward value.

We have no need to trade Yandle and he's a huge part of the team. Unless we get the perfect offer, there is no reason at all to consider moving him. I don't think the perfect offer includes top four D in their late twenties.

blinkman360 10-09-2012 11:21 AM

Grabner, Nelson, NYI 1st for Yandle and Torres? I'm assuming you don't want defense coming back. Doubt the Isles would include Strome either.. if it came down to it they'd probably just take their chances with deHaan/Donovan instead of parting with him.

Wingsfan2965* 10-09-2012 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rt (Post 54854763)
You are a Flames fan, right? For Yandle I'd need Sven Baertschi and your 2013 1st, for starters.

Good God Yandle gets overpriced on a regular basis.

Foppa2118 10-09-2012 02:27 PM

Not that I necessarily want to trade Stastny, but would Stastny and Barrie for Yandle and a 2nd be enough for Phoenix fans?

Zippy316 10-09-2012 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foppa2118 (Post 54870325)
Not that I necessarily want to trade Stastny, but would Stastny and Barrie for Yandle and a 2nd be enough for Phoenix fans?

It probably would be intriguing to say the least.

I'd say they would definitely consider it, but they may not accept it.

Vankiller Whale 10-09-2012 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foppa2118 (Post 54870325)
Not that I necessarily want to trade Stastny, but would Stastny and Barrie for Yandle and a 2nd be enough for Phoenix fans?

I doubt they'd want Stastny's salary on the books, though.

OzzyFan 10-09-2012 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blinkman360 (Post 54866441)
Grabner, Nelson, NYI 1st for Yandle and Torres? I'm assuming you don't want defense coming back. Doubt the Isles would include Strome either.. if it came down to it they'd probably just take their chances with deHaan/Donovan instead of parting with him.

Probably closer to Grabner, MacDonald, + 1st rounder for just Yandle, and that's if the Yotes even want Grabner, who is pretty much the same player Boedker projects to be(but Boedker is more physical).

Puckgenius* 10-09-2012 03:22 PM

JayBo + Backlund for Yandle and I think the Yotes consider it. Backlund has top #1 centre potential and the Yotes are badly needing a #1 centre.

The Zetterberg Era 10-09-2012 03:26 PM

Seabrook would and should cost a lot more than Yandle in my opinion. Seabrook can play in all situations and is great in his own zone while chipping in a little less offensively than Yandle. But still Seabrook is a true #1 D-man and Yandle is #1/2 not the same caliber of player.

rt 10-09-2012 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puckgenius (Post 54871471)
JayBo + Backlund for Yandle and I think the Yotes consider it. Backlund has top #1 centre potential and the Yotes are badly needing a #1 centre.

Backlund? Like Mikael Backlund?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.