![]() |
HoF (I know too early)
Good afternoon Carolina fans! The lockout has been making me think about how these lost years are effecting career stats and accomplishments.
Now I know Cam Ward didnt miss the 04 one, but if this season is locked out he of course will miss a full season. Cam, along with Brodeur, are my all time favorite goaltenders (khabs is 3rd). My question is what stats and accomplishments does wardo need to get into the hall? |
Ward is somewhat screwed by the quality (or lack thereof) of the defense in front of him. Carolina would need to evolve into a dynasty and grab a few cups for Wardo to sniff the Hall.
|
Do you think with another cup and, if he played long enough, 400 wins? Or would he need more?
|
400 is a stretch, id like to see him end up with 350
|
If we win another Cup, he'll win another Conn Smythe (can't see the former happening without the latter). If that's the case, given otherwise regular projections for wins and stats (although with the way this team's looking he might be getting a couple more wins per year than his average), I think he's got a shot. But again, we'd have to win another Cup and he'd have to win another Conn Smythe, easier said than done.
|
Quote:
|
- 1 top 10 season in sv%
- 1 Conn Smythe - 1 Stanley Cup - 0 Vezinas or any other award outside of the above - 0 post season 1st or 2nd All-Star Team Selections - Plays for small market team I'd say no chance whatsoever. He's an above average but not elite goalie and that's already taking into account the poor defense/team factor. Purely on stats and awards he's not even average. He'll have an impressive win total when it's all said and done, but it's not that difficult to accumulate a bunch of wins when you start 70 games a year for 20 years, which we all know will happen because Jim Rutherford is a moron. |
The Cup and Smythe are already checked off his list. His HOF chances won't be about duplicating them.
The biggest thing is that Ward is not in the Vezina-contender category of goalies, and that is what defines eliteness to most critics. So to have a shot, he will NEED to win at least one Vezina. I can't see that being optional. If he were to win a Vezina at some point, adding it to his Cup and Smythe, he'd be in the conversation. At that point it hinges on his longevity, especially how many regular-season games he wins, and whether he is able to generate further Vezina attention and playoff reputation. I'd say his chances are significant enough to mention, but still very low. He would need to really step it up into the Lundqvist/Rinne/Thomas category for at least a few years to have a good shot. |
With goalies it is hard to say, but in the case of ward there is very little that is special about him.
Jean-Sebastien Giguere would get consideration as well then. Ward would need to get to over 400 wins and win a lot more trophies to get in |
It should also be noted that goalies have an extremely high standard for making the Hall of Fame.
Billy Smith Grant Fuhr Patrick Roy Ed Belfour That's your last 20 years of goalies getting into the Hall. Brodeur and Hasek are the only clear-cut locks among recent players. It's extremely difficult to imagine Ward ever joining a group that's THAT selective. |
Quote:
On an off note, I'd definitely say Lundqvist is a candidate for the Hall... |
Yeah some of the recent guys are going to make it an interesting discussion to be sure.
Thomas, as controversial as he was this past season, has to be a solid candidate. His NHL career has been short but his peak's been the best we've seen since Hasek at his prime. Only 7 full NHL seasons and he has 2 Vezinas (also first team AS both seasons), a cup, and a Conn Smythe. He'll get in, IMO, and if not he'll be the best player not in the Hall, which includes Mikhailov and JC Tremblay (ya, i serius). Kipper has a fairly strong shot as well. 3rd and 4th in Hart voting, a Vezina with other finishes of 2nd, 3rd, and 5th. Doesn't have the post-season hardware but he did have a run to the finals. Fairly borderline for making it unless he gets traded somewhere and takes them to a cup (Tampa?) IMO. Lundqvist is a stronger candidate as he's had far more team success then Kipper and is perceived far more as carrying his team until recently. Luongo is basically the modern Curtis Joseph, the Olympic Gold is about the only thing that stands out as an HoF worthy accolade despite the consistently strong career numbers. Biggest thing is that he's perceived as a playoff choker (despite a few strong showings), and he was never good enough to take Florida to the playoffs unlike Lundqvist with some sub-par Rangers teams post-lockout. Basically, his time in Vancouver is being looked at like many in a similar context to Osgood in Detroit. He'd have to win at least a Smythe and a Cup, or a couple Vezinas at this point IMO. and of course there's some older guys like Liut, Joseph, Beezer, Richter, Vernon, and Barrasso that are continually under consideration that just seem to come short of the cutoff. TL/DR version: Basically, if Cam wants to make it he needs to up his game just a bit. A Vezina (which would arguably give him a better resume then anyone I listed aside from Thomas) would put him in strong consideration. But unless the Canes become a consistent playoff team, or he does win that Vezina, he's going to be in the Luongo department of career resumes, and he needs to get at least into Kipper/Lundqvist territory. Cam will probably have the numbers backing in terms of sheer wins numbers and he does have a reputation as being clutch in the post-season: see 06 and 09 (pre-injury) runs where he won the Conn Smythe and was the favorite for it before the injury. |
Quote:
Ward doesn't sniff Belfour's legacy. But he's a nicer guy. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Interesting that you don't mention the guy that I think is most likely to stand in Cam's way (not that I think either gets in as it stands): Pekka Rinne.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As of now, Lundqvist is not an especially strong candidate. If he walked away and retired, he would not make it and it wouldn't be very close either. He needs to have a decently strong 5 years or so, including a signature playoff run, before he can make a serious argument to be inducted over guys like Joseph and Barrasso, neither of whom is on the verge of induction any time soon. The more we talk about this the more I realize that Ward would need to basically redefine his career in order to even be in the conversation. One big playoff run doesn't make a Hall of Fame career. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
No chance of that happening. Canada is a declining hockey power. Most kids in Canada would rather listen to Nickelback and do meth than play hockey. Quebec has produced like three quality NHL players since the last lockout. The immigration numbers don't help, either. For every Nazem Kadri who dreams of being a mediocre AHL grinder, there's millions of others who would rather continue living their own culture than adopting the backwards, 7th-century Canadian lifestyle.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 AM. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.