![]() |
2013 1st Overall Pick
Disregarding CBA negotiations, what could the 1st overall pick fetch if it were used as trade bait? Players like Sean Monahan or Nathan Mackinnon are valued very high, even this early. This most recent draft's first overall was certainly drawing a large amount of speculation, are we going to see the same thing upcoming year for these possible "generational" talents?
|
Cory Schneider++.
|
I would say the top 3 picks are untouchable.
|
Jankowski but the 1st overall team adds +++
|
Quote:
and 1B on their draft board, I doubt the pick would be dealt. The team holding 1st overall, may be willing to drop down 1 spot if they feel the talent drop off is not big and they get something significant back, but I doubt they move a generational talent, for several less talented players and lower picks. |
Reilly + Kadri + Colborne + Frattin + Biggs + 1st
|
Kessel
|
Quote:
I don't think Calgary has/can part with anything to acquire the 1st overall... Giordano / Baertschi / 1st 2013 for 1st overall might do it... I wouldn't though. |
Quote:
Both teams dont do this. |
Quote:
|
Won't be moved unless its Edmonton dropping down a few spots!
|
The only possible way I see someone moving the 1st overall pick, and a slim chance at that, is if its a team in absolute win now mode that can get what they need to get over the hump.
Maybe a team like Philly wins it and trades it for a #1 D and maybe even more? |
before the draft untouchable
After oilers get the pick--does not matter it is a week draft and no one wants the pick |
Quote:
The big thing it depends on is where the pick slots in. Is it top 5? Out of top 10? Not to mention getting Mackinnon would solve a glaring need, 1st line C. Plus he seems to be most hyped player since Tavares, and 1st overalls dont go wrong very often. (EJ last one not going as projected, but all forwards in the last several years have been right on track) EDIT: I agree btw that TO doesnt do this, but its not THAT irrational. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
When is the last time the 1st overall, considered to be a generational talent, was dealt |
Filppula+Quincey+Tatar+Mrazek/McCollum+DET 1st 2003, conditional on Filppula signing?
|
Quote:
Would Pitt accept that for Crosby? |
So the offer has to be adress to Edmonton?
|
Quote:
Whoever's picking 1st overall next year says no easily. Toronto would definitely do it. They're packaging a bunch of lesser pieces + Rielly for a potential generational talent. |
If Edmonton gets it they should move down.
And don't bring up Yakupov-Murray. Completely different. |
1st overall pick is nearly untouchable unless it involves going down a spot or two, and only if there are multiple projected franchise players. Getting a future franchise player is far more valuable to a sucky team than getting a bunch of mid-range prospects, mid-range players and a later first rounder.
|
Too much! :P
Seriously, unless the 2012-13 season is lost and a surprise team get the 1st overall pick via lottery, I say that any team that will get the 1st next season will keep it. Usually teams finishing last won't trade their young assets. They'll focus on rebuilding... Anyway the NHL keeps getting younger and younger and prospects nowadays worth a lot more than it used to. I don't mind any team getting the 1st really except Edmonton. They just had 3 in a row. Looking at rosters right now, I think that Winnipeg or NYIslanders are probably the two teams that most likely to get the 1st overall pick next season. |
Quote:
For the record if there is a season I highly doubt that we will get the #1, there is a lot of pressure for this team to take a step forward. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 AM. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.