![]() |
Getzlaf and/or Perry as rentals.
Just curious, as the very talked-about potential UFAs this upcoming offseason would be a HUGE boost to any playoff team at the deadline.
Ducks fans, before you take off my head, I know this is extremely unlikely to happen as it would depend on the following things: - The Ducks having an abysmal season and deciding to go full-tank mode - Getzlaf and/or Perry being unhappy and Ducks management not being confident in their ability to re-sign - There being an NHL season, let alone one long enough for all of the above to happen (:() So yeah, it's more of an interesting hypothetical and less of a possible reality, but I thought it would be worth discussing anyways. Such is the case during a lockout. :laugh: |
At TD if Getzlaf was expressing to be unwilling to stay in Anaheim after the season, probably Grabovski+cond 2nd for Getzlaf.
|
Schroeder + Connauton + 1st for Perry, if a futures package is wanted, and he does't want to re-sign.
|
Quote:
|
Milan Michalek for Corey Perry
|
It would be a ridiculous bidding war.
But there really is no chance with Getzlaf. Perry...maybe. It would take a lot of things going wrong. |
I believe the last big time name player traded at the deadline was Marian Hossa in 2008 from Atlanta to Pittsburgh. So if either Getzlaf or Perry are traded at the deadline isn't the Hossa trade a good example to use of what Anaheim could want in return?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think Anaheim would need to be 100% sure they weren't re-signing... and I don't think any player would just openly admit that. It's plausible, just not a high percentage.
But yes... a bidding war like Hossa if not more. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
3 1sts? Seeing as most of our prospects are terrible anyways? |
Nobody tops the Michalek offer so far. Yay!!! Ottowa gets Perry!!!1!!
|
Quote:
Sedin-Sedin-Perry would be unfair. |
my guess is any package would need to include a top 6 foward a top prospect and a 1st, remember that Perry is a 50 goal scorer in his prime.
A Sabres example package would likely need to be Stafford + Armia/Pysyk + 2013 1st |
Quote:
But it would make getting a first from a Luongo trade(or elsewhere) of paramount importance. Wouldn't want to miss out on this coming up draft. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
didnt get that |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Armstrong was a top 9 foward at the time, and Esposito was a very good prospect at the time, not the same but close |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 PM. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.