HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Proposal: Jonathan Bernier and Joe Pavelski to Toronto (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1301081)

Puckgenius* 12-03-2012 09:38 PM

Jonathan Bernier and Joe Pavelski to Toronto
 
To TO: Bernier
To LA: Reimer + 1st

Kings downgrade in goal but get a 1st back. Leafs get a starter with high upside.

To TO: Pavelski
To SJ: Lombardi + Kulemim + 2nd

Leafs get a borderline #1 centre (cause Connolly is never healthy) but still a big upgrade on Bozak, Connolly, JVR, Kadri. Sharks upgrade their bottom 6 and 3rd line depth with Kulemin and Lombardi can step into Pavelskis spot.

DKQ 12-03-2012 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puckgenius (Post 56223899)
To TO: Bernier
To LA: Reimer + 1st

Kings downgrade in goal but get a 1st back. Leafs get a starter with high upside.

To TO: Pavelski
To SJ: Lombardi + Kulemim + 2nd

Leafs get a borderline #1 centre (cause Connolly is never healthy) but still a big uprade on Bozak, Connolly, JVR, Kadri, Lombardi. Sharks upgrade their bottom 6 and 3rd line depth with Kulemin and Lombardi can step into Pavelskis spot.

I'm gonna say Toronto says no to the first one, and the Sharks say no to the second one

Vankiller Whale 12-03-2012 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DropkickQuinn (Post 56223937)
I'm gonna say Toronto says no to the first one, and the Sharks say no to the second one

Yeah, this.

Sweech 12-03-2012 09:43 PM

Sharks say a big hell no to the second one.

Two scrap players and a 2nd for Pavelski, laughable.

TheJuxtaposer 12-03-2012 09:44 PM

We can talk Kulemin for Clowe, but that's not even close for Pavelski.

KingCanadain1976 12-03-2012 09:49 PM

Kings say no to this. Need at least a prospect with the frist.

Stop Winnin 12-03-2012 09:50 PM

That second offer is just brutal... :shakehead

Lebowski 12-03-2012 09:57 PM

I love your justification for the second proposal.

"The Leafs get a borderline 1st line center but the Kings solidify their bottom six.

It should automatically ring a bell.

Also, I wouldn't call Bernier a N.1 goalie, nor a goalie with tremendous upside. At this point, I think we can expect him to become an average N.1, if he's ever given the opportunity. He's definitely an upgrade over Reimer, but If I were a Leafs fan, I would sacrifice a first rounder for him, considering the fact that there's a good chance you pick in the lottery again. Even then, you could nab Fucale in the 2013 draft.

TurdFerguson 12-03-2012 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingCanadain1976 (Post 56224303)
Kings say no to this. Need at least a prospect with the frist.

Wow. I guess Bernier will just rot in LA forever then.

glenbuis 12-03-2012 10:01 PM

Id take reimer and the first and not enough for sj.

Puckgenius* 12-03-2012 10:07 PM

Would leafs be willing to move Lupul for a legit top 2 centre? I would cause Pavelski + Kessell would be a nice duo. How about Lombardi + Lupul for Pavelski?

KingCanadain1976 12-03-2012 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TurdFerguson (Post 56224633)
Wow. I guess Bernier will just rot in LA forever then.

He is signed and will be a rfa again after the season. There is no reason to trade him unless we get what we need for him. He is a great insurance should quick get hurt. Also with the cba pushing for more years in rfa He ll proberly be a king till he proves hes worthy of what the kings ask. Hes a nice cheap peace and you ll have to pay a premium to get him. what are the other options pay million for 10 years of loungo lol kipper He is the best option out there imo.

Violent By Design 12-03-2012 10:09 PM

First is too much and second is not enough. The price for Pavelski would be too high for the Leafs to bother, they would be better off targeting a legit #1 center.

thrillermiller89 12-03-2012 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puckgenius (Post 56224903)
Would leafs be willing to move Lupul for a legit top 2 centre? I would cause Pavelski + Kessell would be a nice duo. How about Lombardi + Lupul for Pavelski?

we want no part of Lombardi

The Podium 12-03-2012 10:34 PM

Bernier is no better and the same age as Reimer, in what world is a 1st added?

The seconds not close, although id love Pavelski.

Dolph Ziggler 12-03-2012 10:36 PM

Pretty brutal offer for Pavelski

KingCanadain1976 12-03-2012 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisx101 (Post 56225931)
Bernier is no better and the same age as Reimer, in what world is a 1st added?

The seconds not close, although id love Pavelski.

:shakehead

Kris Chreider 12-03-2012 10:39 PM

San Jose will never consider the Pavelski offer. It's two salary dumps and a 2nd. No way in hell. Kulemin+ is equal to Clowe.

The Podium 12-03-2012 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingCanadain1976 (Post 56226069)
:shakehead

Give me one good reason aside from draft pedigree that would suggest a 1st needs to be added?

Could it have anything to do with Berniers worse career save % in less games on one of the best defensive teams in the league, or Reimers better career save % in more games on one of the worst defensive teams in the league?:laugh:

KingCanadain1976 12-03-2012 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisx101 (Post 56226261)
Give me one good reason aside from draft pedigree that would suggest a 1st needs to be added?

Could it have anything to do with Berniers worse career save % in less games on one of the best defensive teams in the league, or Reimers better career save % in more games on one of the worst defensive teams in the league?:laugh:

Frist off i wouldnt want remier coming back id prefer frattin or carter or maybe kadri. I ask u have u seen bernier play at all ? He is calm and technically very sound. He really only had one bad outing last year against the red wings. As far as stats go yes he might have worse number but a goalie needs to play more then once every 3 weeks or so which is what bernier is averging. The kings dont play the same as they do under Quick They give up alot more shots when bernier is in net. Also he played mostly when the kings couldnt score to save there lives not on the same team that won the cup. He was delveloped right giving him alot of time to develope not his fault quick come in a took over. He has dominated every league hes had the chance to start. All he needs is games to prove it. You would need to actually see him play to see his worth but like most people im sure ur just looking at his stats.

The Podium 12-03-2012 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingCanadain1976 (Post 56226479)
Frist off i wouldnt want remier coming back id prefer frattin or carter or maybe kadri. I ask u have u seen bernier play at all ? He is calm and technically very sound. He really only had one bad outing last year against the red wings. As far as stats go yes he might have worse number but a goalie needs to play more then once every 3 weeks or so which is what bernier is averging. The kings dont play the same as they do under Quick They give up alot more shots when bernier is in net. Also he played mostly when the kings couldnt score to save there lives not on the same team that won the cup. He was delveloped right giving him alot of time to develope not his fault quick come in a took over. He has dominated every league hes had the chance to start. All he needs is games to prove it. You would need to actually see him play to see his worth but like most people im sure ur just looking at his stats.

I have seen him play multiple times, and there is no feasible explanation that can be given that will prove that Bernier is a better calibre of goalie. There is nothing you said in this post that disputed why Bernier is better and why the difference in value is a 1st ( likely to be top 5). Again, i never said Bernier was bad and never said Reimer is better, im arguing the value in the OP.

KingCanadain1976 12-03-2012 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisx101 (Post 56226571)
I have seen him play multiple times, and there is no feasible explanation that can be given that will prove that Bernier is a better calibre of goalie. There is nothing you said in this post that disputed why Bernier is better and why the difference in value is a 1st ( likely to be top 5). Again, i never said Bernier was bad and never said Reimer is better, im arguing the value in the OP.

I never once said u had to agree. The kings are happy with him as backup. As i stated in the other bernier thread Bernier is a cheap young backup right now and is stuck in the kings organization for proberly 3 years before we have to decide on him with the new rfa coming. He simply needs more games to prove he can handle being number one. He would be getting them right now if there was a season due to Quick having off season surgury. If u can see that bernier s number would be better with more playing time ( every goalie is going to get better with more playing time) there nothing i can say to you. I would be willing to make it a frist with it being top 5 protected if that makes u feel better. I agree that would be to much. I think if u have him playing with remier your team would be alot better and i think u would challenge for the playoffs imo therefor the pick would be around 11 - 16 and aston or frattin would be a fair trade.

Seanahue 12-03-2012 11:17 PM

That second proposal may be the worst thing I have ever seen on this board.

DuckEatinShark 12-03-2012 11:18 PM

Lombardi has no value for us whatsoever. Kuli + 2nd doesn't come close to getting Pavelski.

That's like offering Handzus + Galiardi + 2nd for Phaneuf.

Puckgenius* 12-03-2012 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisx101 (Post 56226571)
I have seen him play multiple times, and there is no feasible explanation that can be given that will prove that Bernier is a better calibre of goalie. There is nothing you said in this post that disputed why Bernier is better and why the difference in value is a 1st ( likely to be top 5). Again, i never said Bernier was bad and never said Reimer is better, im arguing the value in the OP.

berniers upside is much larger than Reimer. reimer isnt even gaurenteed to be a legit starter, i see him more of a tweener or a good backup. Like a Raycroft type.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.