![]() |
2014 Olympics and the NHL (UPD: NHL, NHLPA, IIHF, IOC meeting this week)
Okay, so between watching Miracle and tape-delayed World Junior games, I'm getting desperate for hockey. And I know this is probably one of the lowest priorities right now as far as hammering out a CBA goes. But I was just wondering if anyone had heard if the league was including this in whatever their latest offer is. I'm pretty sure I remember that in past conversations that the owners weren't thrilled with this idea, but the players definitely wanted it, especially players like Malkin and Ovechkin, since the Olympics will be in Russia.
|
I hope they don't allow NHL players to participate. I've had enough NHL shut-downs to last a lifetime.
|
Quote:
If the nhl doesn't allow players to participate in the 2014 games, then that's another nail the nhl's coffin. |
Not a fan of NHL players in the Olympics...I always thought the Olympics was about amateur athletes, not paid professionals...?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So if there are no NHL's players in the Olympics, there are one big looser.....Hockey. I bet if The Olympics where held in let say Rogers Arena again, you be all for it. Don't be negative just because it happens to be in Russia this time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I am always in favour of more chances to see the world's best hockey players compete in something that is not the NHL.
The NHL is an awful league with a horribly diluted talent pool. The Olympics is the best hockey anyone can ever hope to watch. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Olympics is the highest quality hockey in the world no doubt,but i do wonder how would Canadian team for example look without NHL players,can anyone make a roster without NHL players to send to Olympics? (just out of pure speculation)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Olympics officially allowed professionals in 86 I think, but in reality they did it cause the Eastern Bloc countries were for years paying their athletes a full wage to train year round anyway. Why should there be a distinction between an athlete making money because people pay to watch him vs an athlete making money cause a sponser pays them to train. The definition of amateur athletics the original olympics had pretty much doesn't exist anymore. |
Quote:
|
I think originally, amateur athletes were often nobility and the wealthy, those who could afford to train in such leisurely, gentlemanly, pursuits. Perhaps not the noblest of ideals to glamorize now.
I remember much talk about how whether there would be olympic participation, similar to realignment, would be big bargaining chips in cba talks, and yet i havent really heard boo from either yet. Maybe they could give the owners their foolishly conceived temporary realignment until expansion plan in exchange for olympic participation? Of course given the damage to the games hrr generation abilities and the half season losses already, neither side may see the monetary advantage of doing it. Although with the cap scheduled to drop that year making it a bit of a circus season anyway, perhaps it would be a nice distraction? |
I thought the 2 sides would trade re-alignment for the players right to play in Olympics. I would weight those 2 items fairly evenly.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In last year's final the top 3 point getters and top 5 goal scorers weren't even playing. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 PM. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.