HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Sciences (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=245)
-   -   Invisible Soldiers? Quantum Stealth material. (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1326015)

tape to tape 01-17-2013 07:10 PM

Invisible Soldiers? Quantum Stealth material.
 
http://www.hyperstealth.com/Quantum-Stealth/index.html

http://www.extremetech.com/tag/hyperstealth

Quote:

A Canadian company called Hyperstealth is reporting that it has developed Quantum Stealth, a material that renders the target “completely invisible by bending light waves around the target.” If the mock-up photos are to be believed, Quantum Stealth basically works like Harry Potter’s invisibility cloak.

Unaffiliated 01-18-2013 12:36 AM

Sounds fishy to me.




As a general comment, the problem with bending all light around you is that you become effectively blind.

RobBrown4PM 01-18-2013 02:35 AM

I call ******** until I see it first hand, or the military actually starts showing it off.

Richer's Ghost 01-18-2013 11:13 AM

Quote:

Both the U.S. and Canadian military have confirmed that it also works against military IR scopes and Thermal Optics.
Apparently his invention also negates the second law of thermodynamics.

I'm calling BS on his claim here.

tape to tape 01-21-2013 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobBrown4PM (Post 57774749)
I call ******** until I see it first hand, or the military actually starts showing it off.

I doubt if we see it first hand for a long time.

If there is any truth to this, the military will likely deny it, say it's a scam, and keep it a secret for as long as possible.

Here is CNN discussing it:


Hivemind 01-21-2013 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richer's Ghost (Post 57783109)
Apparently his invention also negates the second law of thermodynamics.

I'm calling BS on his claim here.

If it's bending visible light, isn't it also plausible it could bend infrared light? In fact, the longer wavelength in the IR portion of the electromagnetic spectrum should make it easier to refract than visible light. How does the 2nd law of thermodynamics even apply here? The cloak doesn't stop an object from radiating heat into its environment, it simply bends the electromagnetic radiation (light, whether in the visible or infrared spectrum).

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ity-cloak.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0721164007.htm

The Russian General 01-21-2013 08:16 PM

Canada can now invade the world :sarcasm:

Richer's Ghost 01-22-2013 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystlyfe (Post 57998675)
If it's bending visible light, isn't it also plausible it could bend infrared light? In fact, the longer wavelength in the IR portion of the electromagnetic spectrum should make it easier to refract than visible light. How does the 2nd law of thermodynamics even apply here? The cloak doesn't stop an object from radiating heat into its environment, it simply bends the electromagnetic radiation (light, whether in the visible or infrared spectrum).

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ity-cloak.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0721164007.htm

The 2nd law applies because of entropy - what is under the cloak is not a closed system.

Quote:

Following the second law of thermodynamics, entropy of a closed system always increases and in heat transfer situations, heat energy is transferred from higher temperature components to lower temperature components.
Despite the bending of the immediate area, the entire area is the system. The cloak cannot prevent object surrounding the cloak from soaking up heat - it can bend all the light it wants but a highly sensitive thermal imaging system (read military grade) will pick up the thermal footprint of the surrounding area as well. The cloak can only hide what is directly under it, not what surrounds it. Just like how a thermal camera will see your footprints long after you've walked on by, it will pick up reflected heat from the ground, rocks, trees, etc. Go jump under your bedsheet and see how much that intensifies your temperature and then tell me it doesn't amplify the heat as it builds up. That heat is going to leech beyond the cloak.

Now if you tell me the requirements to defeat thermal imaging require a 98 degree desert, the user wearing a scuba suit and such, ok... I will concede the point but I find it far from practical to have a sheet of fabric much like the emergency thermal blanket as the inventor already cites be able to thermally absorb enough energy to prevent leeching to the point it extends beyond the field light that is being bent and thus hidden. It's a blanket, not a black hole.

Hivemind 01-22-2013 11:19 PM

It's advertising and PR, naturally they're going to tend to exaggerate its features. I think they were merely pointing out the ability to refract IR light from the wearer.

Also, footsteps aren't an issue if the soldier has been in place for an extended period of time. Like a sniper.

Unaffiliated 01-22-2013 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystlyfe (Post 57998675)
If it's bending visible light, isn't it also plausible it could bend infrared light? In fact, the longer wavelength in the IR portion of the electromagnetic spectrum should make it easier to refract than visible light. How does the 2nd law of thermodynamics even apply here? The cloak doesn't stop an object from radiating heat into its environment, it simply bends the electromagnetic radiation (light, whether in the visible or infrared spectrum).

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ity-cloak.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0721164007.htm

Most (all?) IR scopes are passive. Imagine it's a camera or viewhole that only sees IR.


If they were active (ie: they shoot IR at a target and wait for it to bounce back and hit a receiver), then bending IR would matter.

Hivemind 01-23-2013 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unaffiliated (Post 58139123)
Most (all?) IR scopes are passive. Imagine it's a camera or viewhole that only sees IR.


If they were active (ie: they shoot IR at a target and wait for it to bounce back and hit a receiver), then bending IR would matter.

Bending IR absolutely matters. The IR is radiating from the heat source. The heat source is beneath the blanket. The IR refracts back towards the heat source when it hits the blanket. The IR never reaches the scope.

If the blanket isn't thermally insulated, then the heat source may heat the blanket and cause it to radiate as well. That would obviously be visible to the scope. But that's an easy problem to fix.

Unaffiliated 01-24-2013 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystlyfe (Post 58140339)
Bending IR absolutely matters. The IR is radiating from the heat source. The heat source is beneath the blanket. The IR refracts back towards the heat source when it hits the blanket. The IR never reaches the scope.

I was going to talk about "refracting backwards".

The problem is that I really don't know how the hell they orient the NIM cloak structure, and have serious issues wrapping my head around negative n.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystlyfe (Post 58140339)
If the blanket isn't thermally insulated, then the heat source may heat the blanket and cause it to radiate as well. That would obviously be visible to the scope. But that's an easy problem to fix.

This definitely slipped my mind - thanks.

Francesa 01-24-2013 06:42 AM

Was watching a show on future soldiers on Discovery Science last year and they were talking about this. It was pretty cool.

Hivemind 01-24-2013 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unaffiliated (Post 58213595)
I was going to talk about "refracting backwards".

The problem is that I really don't know how the hell they orient the NIM cloak structure, and have serious issues wrapping my head around negative n.

http://opfocus.org/content/v6/s6/opf...6_s6_1_750.jpg

Unaffiliated 01-24-2013 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystlyfe (Post 58232931)

I've seen pictures like this, and they don't help with me understanding how/why EM waves would propagate near a "cloak".

Richer's Ghost 01-28-2013 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystlyfe (Post 58232931)

this is not real - it is a photoshopped inversion.

EmeticDonut 01-31-2013 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unaffiliated (Post 57771869)
Sounds fishy to me.




As a general comment, the problem with bending all light around you is that you become effectively blind.

I just realized this is why the Predators have IR-vision. Their cloaking devices only bend visible light around them but allowing IR through.

Jussi 01-31-2013 04:02 PM

Camping camo n00bs! :rant:

Hivemind 02-06-2013 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richer's Ghost (Post 58524621)
this is not real - it is a photoshopped inversion.

...duh?

The point of the photoshop is to demonstrate negative refraction, a property that doesn't exist in nature.

Richer's Ghost 02-07-2013 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystlyfe (Post 59175847)
...duh?

The point of the photoshop is to demonstrate negative refraction, a property that doesn't exist in nature.

Ok well I often post images without any context in a science thread and expect everyone to instantly recognize factual evidence from faked concepts.

If only you had included that simple line of text along with your photo only post...

Unaffiliated 02-07-2013 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richer's Ghost (Post 59231653)
Ok well I often post images without any context in a science thread and expect everyone to instantly recognize factual evidence from faked concepts.

If only you had included that simple line of text along with your photo only post...

He was replying to my post, which was talking about negative refractive indices.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unaffiliated (Post 58213595)
The problem is that I really don't know how the hell they orient the NIM cloak structure, and have serious issues wrapping my head around negative n.

The context is there.



Now as I've said, those kinds of pictures don't help me understand how the waves propagate near/around the cloak, but that doesn't mean the post was totally out of the blue.

rocky7 02-09-2013 10:15 PM

If there was any truth to this the military would be all over it. It does sound fishy because we would be getting more info about it, 'top secret' or not. As a hunter, I can tell you that deer can't see alot of things except primarily movement. You can be in full camo or blaze orange, and if you're still and the deer don't smell you, they don't know you are there. I've had deer walk right up to me by just staying perfectly still. It would be great for our troops if this stuff does pan out though.

RobBrown4PM 02-10-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rocky7 (Post 59396097)
If there was any truth to this the military would be all over it. It does sound fishy because we would be getting more info about it, 'top secret' or not. As a hunter, I can tell you that deer can't see alot of things except primarily movement. You can be in full camo or blaze orange, and if you're still and the deer don't smell you, they don't know you are there. I've had deer walk right up to me by just staying perfectly still. It would be great for our troops if this stuff does pan out though.

So this technology is being developed to battle the upcoming Deer invasion?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.