HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Chicago Blackhawks (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   Proposal: Trade for Value, Not Realism: St Louis-Chicago (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1332867)

Any Colour You Like 01-25-2013 05:17 PM

Trade for Value, Not Realism: St Louis-Chicago
 
In terms of value, what's your assessment on this? In no way, shape or form is this a real proposal, by any means, so just assess the VALUE OF THE PLAYERS, not whether or not the trade would actually happen.

:blues
Sharp
Bickell

:hawks
Elliott
Sobotka

MurrayBannerman 01-25-2013 05:19 PM

St. Louis ends up with the vastly better package.

zytz 01-25-2013 05:26 PM

I might be off but I feel like Sharp alone is too much

DisgruntledHawkFan 01-25-2013 05:38 PM

I love me some Sobotka. He'd be a great Kopecky like guy. But lolz no.

MTP 01-25-2013 05:48 PM

Elliott is a product of Hitchcock's system. No thanks.

Chris Hansen 01-25-2013 06:59 PM

Brutal overpayment by the Hawks.

Cullksinikers 01-25-2013 07:11 PM

Horrific.

IU Hawks fan 01-25-2013 09:20 PM

Puke

Any Colour You Like 01-25-2013 10:03 PM

:laugh: Exactly what I was expecting.

Any Colour You Like 01-25-2013 10:07 PM

Not expecting any better:

:blues
Patrick Sharp
Ray Emery

:hawks
Brian Elliott
Vladimir Sobotka
Philip McRae

Chris Hansen 01-25-2013 10:13 PM

Bickell is about as valueless as Emery, but that doesn't matter. Elliott is a product of his system. The revised deal is still gross underpayment by St. Louis.

DisgruntledHawkFan 01-25-2013 10:13 PM

We aren't moving Sharp for a third liner, a guy that's barely an upgrade on Crow and a prospect.

Cullksinikers 01-25-2013 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBH (Post 58359697)
:laugh: Exactly what I was expecting.

Then why make it?

HockeySensible 01-25-2013 11:03 PM

You're badly overrating Elliot, that's the problem with both proposals.

RayP 01-25-2013 11:06 PM

The only goalies I'd be willing to give up Sharp for, the other team wouldn't give up that goalie for Sharp... if that makes sense.

Cullksinikers 01-25-2013 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RayP (Post 58363423)
The only goalies I'd be willing to give up Sharp for, the other team wouldn't give up that goalie for Sharp... if that makes sense.

I am assuming you mean Lundqvist, Rinne, and Quick.

RayP 01-25-2013 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cullksinikers (Post 58363755)
I am assuming you mean Lundqvist, Rinne, and Quick.

Yeah, then there are tweeners like Price, Lehtonen, Rask, and Halak. Would have to think long and hard with those.

Cullksinikers 01-25-2013 11:15 PM

I just hate how the OP plays it off like it was just a joke. It was a truthfully honest proposal that he thought was good between two teams that will never make a trade.

Elliott is getting too much respect. He has been a good goalie, but I don't know if he's the same guy with Chicago. Bickell barely has any trade value. If the Hawks put him on the block, they would probably get something like a fourth-round pick. Sobotka does his job and does it well, but it's not worth giving up one of your four best forwards to get a goalie who struggled elsewhere and a responsible forward. It's really bad.

DisgruntledHawkFan 01-25-2013 11:19 PM

Yea. This thread is done.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.