HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Polls - (hockey-related only) (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=72)
-   -   Hawks vs Sharks 7 game series right now (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1334823)

illpucks 01-27-2013 09:25 PM

Hawks vs Sharks 7 game series right now
 
Both Teams are on fire. Who would win if they had a 7 game series right now?

ottawa* 01-27-2013 09:28 PM

Hawks in 6...why? Because Kane is my favourite player outside the habs :)

AKL 01-27-2013 09:33 PM

Sharks. Goaltending is pretty much a wash I guess. Sharks are deeper though I think.

Sky04 01-27-2013 09:35 PM

I'd go with the Sharks in this regard, Thornton averaging 3 points a game with Marleau averaging 2 goals per game is just ridiculous.

Caballo Blanco 01-27-2013 09:36 PM

Hawks have the intangibles.

Kitten Mittons 01-27-2013 09:52 PM

Without Burns, Hawks in 7.

STC 01-27-2013 09:53 PM

This is as no brainer as no brainers get. Hawks are proven winners who already swept the Sharks out of the playoffs en route to a Stanley Cup whereas Sharks are proven playoff chokers.

Hawks in 4. AINEC.

Leidi J 01-27-2013 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STC (Post 58504245)
This is as no brainer as no brainers get. Hawks are proven winners who already swept the Sharks out of the playoffs en route to a Stanley Cup whereas Sharks are proven playoff chokers.

Hawks in 4. AINEC.

this wins for the stupidest thing i've read tonight. Congratulations :handclap:

MrFunnyWobbl 01-27-2013 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigPAVELSKI (Post 58504363)
this wins for the stupidest thing i've read tonight. Congratulations :handclap:

He has a point, although an odd context.

I'll take the hawks in 7.

Ninja Hertl 01-27-2013 10:01 PM

sharks don't have Burns, so hawks in 6.

WarriorOfGandhi 01-27-2013 10:02 PM

the difference between both clubs is by no means large but I'd take the team with Niemi in net over the team with Crawford

JayKing 01-27-2013 10:03 PM

Hawks in 6. Deeper offense + too many injuries for the Sharks.

VerySuperFamous 01-27-2013 10:10 PM

Hawks in 6. If Burns was back already Sharks in 5-6.

Barrie22 01-27-2013 10:11 PM

hawks 6-0
sharks 5-0

hawks 22 goals for
sharks 23 goals for

hawks 13 goals against
sharks 8 goals against

hawks power play 25.9% (10th in the league)
sharks power play 37.5% (1st in the league)

hawks penalty kill 95.6% (2nd in the league)
sharks penalty kill 78.3% (17th in the league)

Leidi J 01-27-2013 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrFunnyWobbl (Post 58504893)
He has a point, although an odd context.

I'll take the hawks in 7.

a point? not sure how a playoff series almost 4 years ago has anything to do with now. the teams are soooo different. hell the goalie for one is now the goalie for the other. you're welcome to think the hawks would beat the sharks, but you're logic is flawed.

PoolChamp 01-27-2013 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barrie22 (Post 58505629)
hawks 6-0
sharks 5-0

hawks 22 goals for
sharks 23 goals for

hawks 13 goals against
sharks 8 goals against

hawks power play 25.9% (10th in the league)
sharks power play 37.5% (1st in the league)

hawks penalty kill 95.6% (2nd in the league)
sharks penalty kill 78.3% (17th in the league)

this all means nothing head to head. Hawks are a bad matchup for the sharks. Hawks for sure.

SillyRabbit 01-27-2013 10:17 PM

People are overrating Burns, he's not that big of a factor.

I'd take Hawks in 6.

If Burns was in the lineup i'd still take Hawks in 6.

Billy Mays Here 01-27-2013 10:17 PM

Marleau and Thornton would light up Emery and Crawford. Sharks in 6.

Barrie22 01-27-2013 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PoolChamp (Post 58505903)
this all means nothing head to head. Hawks are a bad matchup for the sharks. Hawks for sure.

last years season series, won by the sharks. 2-1-1.
2010-11 season series, won by the sharks. 3-1-0
2009-10 season series, won by the hawks. 1-2-1

MessierII 01-27-2013 10:27 PM

Hawks in 7 sharks are red hot right now but Jonothan Toews plays for the Hawks.

STC 01-27-2013 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigPAVELSKI (Post 58504363)
this wins for the stupidest thing i've read tonight. Congratulations :handclap:


What did I say that was incorrect?


Is it not true that the Sharks are a team full of playoff chokers who will no doubt choke again this spring?

And is it not true that most of the key players on the Hawks have already hoisted the Cup?

Easy sweep for the Hawks, Sharks are a joke and have been for a very long time.

Sky04 01-27-2013 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STC (Post 58508093)
What did I say that was incorrect?


Is it not true that the Sharks are a team full of playoff chokers who will no doubt choke again this spring?

And is it not true that most of the key players on the Hawks have already hoisted the Cup?

Easy sweep for the Hawks, Sharks are a joke and have been for a very long time.

Everything you said is ridiculous, and further proves you don't know what your talking about at all. I'd stop posting for a bit, watch some games then maybe after thinking about what you write before you post it, come back.

"sharks are chokers"- already nullifies any credibility you have, hawks have hoisted the SC? oh right, why don't they beat Vancouver every time in the playoffs then? Good logic A+ right there.

Clowe Me 01-27-2013 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STC (Post 58508093)
What did I say that was incorrect?


Is it not true that the Sharks are a team full of playoff chokers who will no doubt choke again this spring?

And is it not true that most of the key players on the Hawks have already hoisted the Cup?

Easy sweep for the Hawks, Sharks are a joke and have been for a very long time.

The Blackhawks have also lost their past 2 playoff series'. By your logic, they are proven losers and jokes.

Arrch 01-27-2013 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STC (Post 58508093)
What did I say that was incorrect?


Is it not true that the Sharks are a team full of playoff chokers who will no doubt choke again this spring?

And is it not true that most of the key players on the Hawks have already hoisted the Cup?

Easy sweep for the Hawks, Sharks are a joke and have been for a very long time.

Which Shark peed in your Cheerios this morning?

Dominate Kesler 01-27-2013 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STC (Post 58508093)
What did I say that was incorrect?


Is it not true that the Sharks are a team full of playoff chokers who will no doubt choke again this spring?

And is it not true that most of the key players on the Hawks have already hoisted the Cup?

Easy sweep for the Hawks, Sharks are a joke and have been for a very long time.

Stop acting like the Blackhawks as a franchise are dominant in the post season. :laugh:

You do realize you got bounced in the first round the past 2 seasons right? How about all those years before you finally manage to win one?

Also, Crawford is seriously awful. That's a huge advantage the Sharks have over the Blackhawks. At least Niemi is average to above average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.