Do you like the Super Bowl being played in a cold weather city?
 

With the Super Bowl being in East Rutherford next year, I find this to be very intriguing. Part of me thinks that this game should be only be played in a warm weather city or in a dome. But I also do it find it fascinating that the Super Bowl could be played in the snow, which I love games in that type of weather.

It doesn't matter

HAve a go

Yes; then again, not any cold-weather city can hold a SB.

Get a SB in Green Bay

No, I'd hate to see the game ruined if the weather was crappy and you ended up with like a 10-7 game

Cold weather city? Yes.

The fact that it'll probably only be New York? Not so much.

Don't care at all about the comfort of the corporate fans in attendance, just want to watch the game. And an ice bowl or a rain bowl or a fog bowl or something like that can be damn interesting.

Well Indianapolis had it last year. We have a roof though so that may not count...

Love when the elements are involved.

Clearly talking about outdoor cold weather stadiums. Indy isn't considered a cold weather city because of that, nor is Detroit or Minnesota (with their current stadium) due to that.

Chicago, Green Bay, Cleveland, Denver, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, New York, New England, etc. are the ones I'm talking about.

Yes. And one should be in Denver immediately.

Any other game during the year (outside of a dome) is subject to weather.

Why should the Super Bowl purposely avoid inclement weather?

I wish Super Bowl was actually treated like a championship game instead of an all-star game. I'd get rid of predetermined neutral sites. Home field goes to the team with the better record (or other tiebreakers). But that'd never happen.

Nope. I don't like it being played in domes either.

If it were up to me, I'd limit the the sites to Southern California or Florida. The game should be outside, in a nice climate, on grass.

they wont be able to do that, they wouldnt be able to plan everything that needs to happen in order to host a Super Bowl in two weeks.

Probably wont be in NO until they get a new stadium

The game is supposed to be played in the elements, so yes. I would entertain the idea of the team with the best record playing in their own stadium as well.

That's my point. The SB is treated like it's more than just a championship game. There wouldn't be any need of "preparations" if the Super Bowl was just a championship game.

Absolutely. Football is meant to be played in the elements.

Love it. Nothing like a big time playoff game in 0degrees/snow.

Plus, I am biased. I will be in a lottery to win tickets. I have came up empty the past 4 chances, so I am definitely due. Fingers crossed, so excited.

I think if you don't want weather to impact the Super Bowl, they shouldn't have weather impact regular season games either.

I don't get this argument, unless you think it should only be played in domes.

Yes please. Snowbowl!

I like it, power outages are quite entertaining

Yes, every city should host the game

My opinion is the general population cares more about the commercials and half time show than the actual game. Beyonce can't shake her ass when it's -5 out.


I don't understand why a neutral city is usually chosen to host the Super Bowl. I would have preferred the Giants winning the Lombardi in Metlife Stadium than in Indianapolis.