HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Proposal: Omark/Filatov (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1352561)

Iceonfire 02-17-2013 04:24 AM

Omark/Filatov
 
Would Ottawa consider trading the rights to Filatov for the rights to Omark?

Ottawa isn't very deep on the wings and Omark has 65 points in 45 games over in Europe.

Filatov was never really given a chance at the NHL level, and I think Columbus' style did not fit him at all.

Edmonton's run & gun style would very much compliment Filatov and I could see him and Yakupov playing well together.

There isn't much to lose for either team, and both seem to be top 6 or bust players.

I still believe that Omark has NHL talent, but his relationship with the management in Edmonton was horrid.

crack2464 02-17-2013 04:27 AM

Filatov would be useless if not in a top 6 role and the last thing Edmonton needs is another small forward

Iceonfire 02-17-2013 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crack2464 (Post 59880701)
Filatov would be useless if not in a top 6 role and the last thing Edmonton needs is another small forward

He is 6'0 and 190lbs, that is average not small. Although he doesn't have much of a physical game.

oilinblood 02-17-2013 04:53 AM

Filatov is a fit kid of average size... unfortunately i think he prefers working out to stare at himself in the mirror as opposed to play hockey.

zeus3007* 02-17-2013 06:19 AM

I'd rather trade Omark for a pick, lol.

SenateReform 02-17-2013 07:15 AM

I'd do it as a Sens fan.

MandyAlwaysKnows 02-17-2013 07:18 AM

Sure.

Bring Omark over asap

BonkTastic 02-17-2013 08:40 AM

So we'd be trading one guy unlikely to ever play for us again, for a player who probably won't ever play for us in the first place?


Sure, sign me up. I'm game.
At least this way, we can talk about the Swede who is playing overseas rather than the Russian playing there.

internetdotcom 02-17-2013 09:32 AM

Neither is likely to have an NHL career, but just the same, I'll keep the guy who has the higher upside (as Filatov just needs to get his head on straight, whereas Omark isn't talented enough to be a top 6 in the NHL, and would be useless in a bottom 6 role).

lakai17 02-17-2013 01:02 PM

Gryba for Omark.

Kaen 02-17-2013 02:02 PM

Doesn't seem like either guy will make it in his current team so not a lot to lose and no other teams are lining up to give up anything of value, so I'll give it a sure why not.

MessierII 02-17-2013 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zeus3007 (Post 59881527)
I'd rather trade Omark for a pick, lol.

Me too. Someone give us a third and call it a day. Come on wings.

Spawn 02-17-2013 02:32 PM

Neither player is willing to put in the time in the AHL required to be effective NHL players. Waste of the paper required to complete the transaction.

CBJBrassard16 02-17-2013 02:36 PM

I thought the sens didnt give a QO to Filatov and lost his rights?

Trafalgar Law 02-17-2013 02:50 PM

I'll take a 4th round pick instead.

Synthetek 02-17-2013 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lakai17 (Post 59895267)
gryba for omark.

oh hell no!

Qward 02-17-2013 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CBJBrassard16 (Post 59902381)
I thought the sens didnt give a QO to Filatov and lost his rights?

They qualified him.

He will be back. Still do not understand why people are so butthurt by this kid.

lakai17 02-17-2013 03:24 PM

Omark would be an impact player if he stepped into the Sens lineup today.

ViCiieux 02-17-2013 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by internetdotcom (Post 59884655)
Neither is likely to have an NHL career, but just the same, I'll keep the guy who has the higher upside (as Filatov just needs to get his head on straight, whereas Omark isn't talented enough to be a top 6 in the NHL, and would be useless in a bottom 6 role).

That is alot of ********. Omark had 0.47/ppg in Edmonton on the THIRD line.
Omark is well enough talented to rip YOUR team top 6 up.

He is way more talented than Greening(hahaha) and Silfverberg both together.
And your team have Zibanejad on the first line!!!

Benny FTW 02-17-2013 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViCiieux (Post 59905803)
That is alot of ********. Omark had 0.47/ppg in Edmonton on the THIRD line.
Omark is well enough talented to rip YOUR team top 6 up.

He is way more talented than Greening(hahaha) and Silfverberg both together.
And your team have Zibanejad on the first line!!!

Your GM must suck for not letting such a talent play on your team.

Qward 02-17-2013 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViCiieux (Post 59905803)
That is alot of ********. Omark had 0.47/ppg in Edmonton on the THIRD line.
Omark is well enough talented to rip YOUR team top 6 up.

He is way more talented than Greening(hahaha) and Silfverberg both together.
And your team have Zibanejad on the first line!!!

Now you sound bad.

Silfverberg is a better player than Omark. He has taken time to get going in the NHL but so do a lot of Euro players.


Look at their stats. Silf has out preformed Omark on every other level.

ViCiieux 02-17-2013 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qward (Post 59907917)
Now you sound bad.

Silfverberg is a better player than Omark. He has taken time to get going in the NHL but so do a lot of Euro players.


Look at their stats. Silf has out preformed Omark on every other level.

Lol. Are you serious?

http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=4008
Omark;
First year in NHL 0.47/ppg on the THIRD line.

http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=6562
Silfverberg;
First year in NHL 0.2/ppg on the SECOND line.

Where exactly have Silfverberg outperformed Omark?

ViCiieux 02-17-2013 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benny FTW (Post 59907903)
Your GM must suck for not letting such a talent play on your team.

He isn't on my team. I just like him and I'm certain that he can compete at a sucky top6 that Ottawa have.

TOML 02-17-2013 05:02 PM

Lol. Flashy crap for flashy crap. Why bother?


TOML

ViCiieux 02-17-2013 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TOML (Post 59912351)
Lol. Flashy crap for flashy crap. Why bother?


TOML

Pavel Datsyuk is also a flashy crap?
http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=8615
He had 0.5/ppg in his first year, on a cup contender team!

Omark had 0.47/ppg in his first year, on the worst team in NHL.

You see what I did there?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.