HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   The Business of Hockey (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=124)
-   -   How/what to name 4 re-aligned groupings? (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1360759)

LadyStanley 02-26-2013 11:50 AM

How/what to name 4 re-aligned groupings?
 
CCtsn 9:36am via Twitter for BlackBerry® With #NHL realignment on the agenda, time to reintroduce a proposal I blogged last yr to name the conferences; Gretzky Howe Orr and Lemieux

patnyrnyg 02-26-2013 11:51 AM

Patrick, Adams, Norris, Smythe

MuckOG 02-26-2013 11:53 AM

Pierre LuBrun just tweeted the following:

Atlantic
Central
Mid-West
Pacific

cbcwpg 02-26-2013 11:58 AM

My guess is you are not going to see the word "South" anywhere near a division name...

No Fun Shogun 02-26-2013 11:59 AM

Yeah, they're not going to go back to the old-style names for the divisions. They're going to stick with geographic names.

.... though considering the "Midwest" will have teams in Colorado, Tennessee, Texas, and Manitoba, I'd like to think that they wouldn't name the division after a geographic region that over half the teams aren't even within. Just name it the Central and call whatever they're planning on calling the Central something else.

DrVanntastic 02-26-2013 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MuckOG (Post 60506045)
Pierre LuBrun just tweeted the following:

Atlantic
Central
Mid-West
Pacific

I was thinking along these lines too.

East - Boston, Buffalo, Detroit, Florida, Montreal, Ottawa, Tampa Bay, Toronto

Atlantic - Carolina, Columbus, New Jersey, New York Islanders, New York Rangers, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Washington

Central - Chicago, Colorado, Dallas, Minnesota, Nashville, St. Louis, Winnipeg

West - Anaheim, Calgary, Edmonton, Los Angeles, Phoenix, San Jose, Vancouver

Do Make Say Think 02-26-2013 12:01 PM

Geographic names make much more sense from a marketing point of view

Using player names is a nice nod to former greats but it's confusing to new comers which is no good for the NHL

David_99 02-26-2013 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MuckOG (Post 60506045)
Pierre LuBrun just tweeted the following:

Atlantic - NY etc ?
Central - TO etc ?
Mid-West - CHI etc ?
Pacific - SJ etc?

Makes no sense Pierre

SmellOfVictory 02-26-2013 12:05 PM

I'd like to see them go with something totally new.

Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, Delta
Anterior, Posterior, Distal, Proximal
Meat, Dairy, Grain, Vegetable

madhi19 02-26-2013 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadyStanley (Post 60505903)
CCtsn 9:36am via Twitter for BlackBerry® With #NHL realignment on the agenda, time to reintroduce a proposal I blogged last yr to name the conferences; Gretzky Howe Orr and Lemieux

How about Gretzky, Howe, Lemieux and Richard. Because no way in hell you can pass on naming a conference after an Habs. Orr can have a trophy if you want to honor him hell he should have one anyway it long overdue.

Kebekoi 02-26-2013 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noteman (Post 60506381)
I was thinking along these lines too.

East - Boston, Buffalo, Detroit, Florida, Montreal, Ottawa, Tampa Bay, Toronto

Atlantic - Carolina, Columbus, New Jersey, New York Islanders, New York Rangers, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Washington

Central - Chicago, Colorado, Dallas, Minnesota, Nashville, St. Louis, Winnipeg

West - Anaheim, Calgary, Edmonton, Los Angeles, Phoenix, San Jose, Vancouver

Eastern Conference
OldBoys+Florida (Dunno?)
Atlantic
Western Conference
Central or Mid-West
Pacific

CHRDANHUTCH 02-26-2013 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madhi19 (Post 60506657)
How about Gretzky, Howe, Lemieux and Richard. Because no way in hell you can pass on naming a conference after an Habs. Orr can have a trophy if you want to honor him hell he should have one anyway it long overdue.

you do realize, the Maurice Richard Trophy is already awarded to the Scoring champion, madhi.

David_99 02-26-2013 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHRDANHUTCH (Post 60506895)
you do realize, the Maurice Richard Trophy is already awarded to the Scoring champion, madhi.

Gretzky, Howe, Lemieux and BoomBoom.

Fixed. :sarcasm:

patnyrnyg 02-26-2013 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canadian Guy (Post 60506435)
Geographic names make much more sense from a marketing point of view

Using player names is a nice nod to former greats but it's confusing to new comers which is no good for the NHL

It is not that difficult to figure out. When I first got into hockey before the internet, I actually went to the library to look up where the division names came from.

cbcwpg 02-26-2013 12:16 PM

The NHL should stay away from naming the divisions after people...we will be fighting over those names for the next 50 years.... just have general names

patnyrnyg 02-26-2013 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by No Fun Shogun (Post 60506305)
Yeah, they're not going to go back to the old-style names for the divisions. They're going to stick with geographic names.

.... though considering the "Midwest" will have teams in Colorado, Tennessee, Texas, and Manitoba, I'd like to think that they wouldn't name the division after a geographic region that over half the teams aren't even within. Just name it the Central and call whatever they're planning on calling the Central something else.

I know, but when someone asks, that will be my answer. Last year, when the Rangers clinched the Atlantic, there was a picture going around facebook where someone made a banner similar to those that hang in MSG that said, "PATRICK DIVISION CHAMPIONS 2011-12"

Enigma Publius 02-26-2013 12:22 PM

They should just go back to the old names. They carry tradition, etc. I'm guessing they are scrapping the Northeast moniker because it now includes the Florida teams, and it'd be odd naming a division the same as the conference. But calling it Central is just as stupid.

Screw You Rick Nash 02-26-2013 12:22 PM

Either the geographic region or go back to what it was years ago. I'm 100% not in favor in all that Howe/Gretzky ****.

I don't want the Rangers to play in a division who's named after a player on my second-most hated team. I'm sure others feel the same about playing in a division named after Lester Patrick, but they aren't comparable, IMO. The NHL and the sport of hockey would be entirely different if it wasn't for Patrick. The only thing that would be different if Lemieux didn't play hockey is that there would be one less team in Pennsylvania.

cheswick 02-26-2013 12:23 PM

West
East
South-North
EWI (Everyone will ignore)

madhi19 02-26-2013 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHRDANHUTCH (Post 60506895)
you do realize, the Maurice Richard Trophy is already awarded to the Scoring champion, madhi.

You do realize that I could have been talking about Henri and with 11 cups he fit the bill. loll But fine pick another one you got 60 hall of famer to choose from.

Puckschmuck* 02-26-2013 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by No Fun Shogun (Post 60506305)
Yeah, they're not going to go back to the old-style names for the divisions. They're going to stick with geographic names.

.... though considering the "Midwest" will have teams in Colorado, Tennessee, Texas, and Manitoba, I'd like to think that they wouldn't name the division after a geographic region that over half the teams aren't even within. Just name it the Central and call whatever they're planning on calling the Central something else.

Just wanted to add that Manitoba is essentially the Mid-Western province in Canada, similar to Minnesota. Colorado, Tenessee and Texas I agree with your statement.

Shrimper 02-26-2013 12:59 PM

Current names are quite boring I find and don't really have any "history" behind them, at least with the others there was a backstory. I'd go with updated names though;

Gretzky
Orr
Lemieux
Howe

Shawa666 02-26-2013 01:05 PM

Patrick, Adams, Norris, Smythe

Blackhawkswincup 02-26-2013 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawa666 (Post 60509833)
Patrick, Adams, Norris, Smythe

^
This

Honestly the Gretzky , Howe , etc idea is awful

Shockmaster 02-26-2013 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MuckOG (Post 60506045)
Pierre LuBrun just tweeted the following:

Atlantic
Central
Mid-West
Pacific

So would that mean the current NE teams + Florida teams and Detroit would be the new Atlantic division and the current Atlantic teams + Carolina, Columbus, and Washington would be the new Central division?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.