HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Vancouver Canucks (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   What would our lineup look like if we still had Grabner and Hodgson ? (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1361753)

LolClarkson* 02-27-2013 02:09 PM

What would our lineup look like if we still had Grabner and Hodgson ?
 
This is not a thread to start trade arguments.

But Im curious what our starting lineup would look like if we had them and not the forwards that are in their spots.

Hodgson would probably have the second line center spot locked because Kesler is injured too much.

And I could see Grabner being on the second or third line.

y2kcanucks 02-27-2013 02:52 PM

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Booth-Hodgson-Kesler
Raymond-Schroeder-Grabner
Higgins-Lapierre-Hansen

Hamhuis-Bieksa
Edler-Tanev
Garrison-Alberts

Luongo
Schneider

Or something along those lines. I wonder where this comes too in terms of the cap?

LolClarkson* 02-27-2013 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by y2kcanucks (Post 60592185)
Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Booth-Hodgson-Kesler
Raymond-Schroeder-Grabner
Higgins-Lapierre-Hansen

Hamhuis-Bieksa
Edler-Tanev
Garrison-Alberts

Luongo
Schneider

Or something along those lines. I wonder where this comes too in terms of the cap?

Kesler on the wing ? Is that doable ?

ARSix 02-27-2013 02:57 PM

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Booth-Kesler-Grabner
Raymond-Hodgson-Hansen
Higgins-Lapierre-Weise

Hamhuis-Bieksa
Edler-Tanev
Garrison-Alberts

Luongo
Schneider

Schroeder would still be in Chicago.

opendoor 02-27-2013 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARSix (Post 60592479)
Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Booth-Kesler-Grabner
Raymond-Hodgson-Hansen
Higgins-Lapierre-Weise

Hamhuis-Bieksa
Edler-Tanev
Garrison-Alberts

Luongo
Schneider

Schroeder would still be in Chicago.

Hodgson's dad wouldn't stand for that lineup.

Taelin 02-27-2013 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by opendoor (Post 60592585)
Hodgson's dad wouldn't stand for that lineup.

Hodgson's dad's lineup.

Sedin-Hodgson-Sedin
Everyone else.

LolClarkson* 02-27-2013 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by opendoor (Post 60592585)
Hodgson's dad wouldn't stand for that lineup.

Its not as good as the first lineup anyway.

y2kcanucks 02-27-2013 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goldrunner (Post 60592275)
Kesler on the wing ? Is that doable ?

Why not?

LolClarkson* 02-27-2013 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by y2kcanucks (Post 60593849)
Why not?

If that was so easy, why didn't we do that to keep Hodgsons old man happy ?

Real Gudbranson 02-27-2013 04:20 PM

Grabner would probably be the doghouse more often than not.

BrockH 02-27-2013 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goldrunner (Post 60597199)
If that was so easy, why didn't we do that to keep Hodgsons old man happy ?

Because it wouldn't have been the best lineup we could ice. You don't build a team around a dad's demands. Plus, you want Kesler playing their best forwards and Hodsgon sheltered. Can't do that with them on the same line.

Btw, you realize Kesler has played wing effectively before (with Sundin), right?

As for whether you would put him on the wing and give Hodsgon the center spot...highly debatable, I wouldn't...but Kesler on the wing is definitely doable.

RezChi 02-27-2013 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goldrunner (Post 60592275)
Kesler on the wing ? Is that doable ?

In my opinion he's more of a winger type of player

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Raymond-Kesler-Grabner
Booth-Hodgson-Hansen
Higgins-Lapierre-Weise

Hamhuis-Bieksa
Edler-Tanev
Garrison-Alberts

LolClarkson* 02-27-2013 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrockH (Post 60597287)
Because it wouldn't have been the best lineup we could ice. You don't build a team around a dad's demands. Plus, you want Kesler playing their best forwards and Hodsgon sheltered. Can't do that with them on the same line.

Btw, you realize Kesler has played wing effectively before (with Sundin), right?

As for whether you would put him on the wing and give Hodsgon the center spot...highly debatable, I wouldn't...but Kesler on the wing is definitely doable.

If Kes could play on the wing then I don't think it was worth keeping him in the center spot just to prove a point to Mr. Hodgson.

That is what should have been done.

PRNuck 02-27-2013 04:31 PM

Sedin-Hodgson-Burrows
Raymond-Kesler-Grabner
Booth-Friesen-Sturm
Desbiens-Lapierre-Weise

Campoli-Bieksa
Jack Johnson-Tanev
Barker-Alberts

That's right. Your selfish game of "what if" set off a horrific butterfly effect that forever changed the Canucks roster for the worse!

LolClarkson* 02-27-2013 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RezChi (Post 60597297)
In my opinion he's more of a winger type of player

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Raymond-Kesler-Grabner
Booth-Hodgson-Hansen ---3rd line
Higgins-Lapierre-Weise

Hamhuis-Bieksa
Edler-Tanev
Garrison-Alberts

Cant be done.

RezChi 02-27-2013 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goldrunner (Post 60597877)
Cant be done.

More like a 2A 2B type of lines ;D second line minutes

Real Gudbranson 02-27-2013 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PRNuck (Post 60597869)
Sedin-Hodgson-Burrows
Raymond-Kesler-Grabner
Booth-Friesen-Sturm
Desbiens-Lapierre-Weise

Campoli-Bieksa
Jack Johnson-Tanev
Barker-Alberts

That's right. Your selfish game of "what if" set off a horrific butterfly effect that forever changed the Canucks roster for the worse!

That D looks terrifying. :scared:

So many giveaways

PRNuck 02-27-2013 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Classless One (Post 60598291)
That D looks terrifying. :scared:

So many giveaways

I know eh? I hope we all learned an important lesson here.

Real Gudbranson 02-27-2013 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PRNuck (Post 60598681)
I know eh? I hope we all learned an important lesson here.

I just noticed we only have one Sedin! Damn hypotheticals.

PRNuck 02-27-2013 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Classless One (Post 60598773)
I just noticed we only have one Sedin! Damn hypotheticals.

Right!? That's the worst part of all. Cody's dad insisted we move Henrik.

slappipappi 02-27-2013 04:56 PM

If we had kept Grabner we likely would never have gotten Booth.

Real Gudbranson 02-27-2013 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PRNuck (Post 60598989)
Right!? That's the worst part of all. Cody's dad insisted we move Henrik.

Casual pairing Campoli-Bieksa would be hilarious to watch.

RezChi 02-27-2013 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PRNuck (Post 60598989)
Right!? That's the worst part of all. Cody's dad insisted we move Henrik.

Nono pretty sure Cody's dad wanted Kesler out, but since AV prefers "hard working forecheckers" AV suggested Henrik to move

LolClarkson* 02-27-2013 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slappipappi (Post 60599063)
If we had kept Grabner we likely would never have gotten Booth.

I'll take it.

LolClarkson* 02-27-2013 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RezChi (Post 60599257)
Nono pretty sure Cody's dad wanted Kesler out, but

He got his wish...:shakehead


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.