HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   San Jose Sharks (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=43)
-   -   Confirmed with Link: [SJS/NSH] Sharks acquire Scott Hannan for a 7th (Could turn into 6th) (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1394257)

Shape 04-03-2013 11:50 AM

[SJS/NSH] Sharks acquire Scott Hannan for a 7th (Could turn into 6th)
 
http://www.sbnation.com/nhl/2013/4/3...nnan-predators

:laugh:

SETHROLLINS 04-03-2013 11:51 AM

Right.

lsx 04-03-2013 11:52 AM

Wonderful.

sjshrky27 04-03-2013 11:55 AM

Cup is ours.


Hahahahahha:help:

Arrch 04-03-2013 11:59 AM

Neat

ChubbChubby 04-03-2013 12:00 PM

Please be a 7th.

Both as the pick going the other way and as our 7th defenseman come playoff time.

Gilligans Island 04-03-2013 12:01 PM

called it

SpinTheBlackCircle 04-03-2013 12:01 PM

Is for a 7th rounder.

Really like it.

Oppa 04-03-2013 12:02 PM

any reason to the madness?

we just lost the future Pavs

krudmonk 04-03-2013 12:03 PM

Low price for a depth move. Cue the usual outrage around here.

OrrNumber4 04-03-2013 12:03 PM

7th rounder? Not much of a loss. Thought there was some weakness on defense, but don't know if Hannan addresses this.

Honestly, I wouldn't have minded trading Murray for Hannan...

Blades of Glory 04-03-2013 12:03 PM

Somehow, 9 years later, we are still icing 1/3 of the defense we had during the 2004 season. Who's next? Jason Marshall? :laugh:

SharksFan1 04-03-2013 12:04 PM

DW setting up a package of picks and Demers/Braun for a winger?

hockeyball 04-03-2013 12:04 PM

Hopefully its a 7th in 2020.

If Hannan ever see's the ice in San Jose we lose a 6th round pick for nothing. If he doesn't see the ice we lose a 7th round pick for nothing.

It's just a 6/7th, but its still basically throwing it in the garbage.

Hatrick Marleau 04-03-2013 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockeyball (Post 63138959)
Hopefully its a 7th in 2020.

If Hannan ever see's the ice in San Jose we lose a 6th round pick for nothing. If he doesn't see the ice we lose a 7th round pick for nothing.

It's just a 6/7th, but its still basically throwing it in the garbage.

It's a 6th if he plays in the playoffs a 7th if he doesn't play in the playoffs. Why are you so upset about trading a 7th for a depth Dman?

OrrNumber4 04-03-2013 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hatrick marleau (Post 63139233)
it's a 6th if he plays in the playoffs a 7th if he doesn't play in the playoffs. Why are you so upset about trading a 7th for a depth dman?

PROSPECTS!!! HUR HUR HUR HUR! RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE!

Personally, what I would mind more is the quality of d-man. If the Sharks acquired someone like Filip Kuba (off the top of my head), someone who is a clear upgrade over Tennysone and would easily justify being the #5-6 guy all on his own, I wouldn't have minded paying even a 4th or 5th for him.

A player like Hannan shouldn't be seeing any ice time. Petrecki would probably be better than him.

DuckEatinShark 04-03-2013 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockeyball (Post 63138959)
Hopefully its a 7th in 2020.

If Hannan ever see's the ice in San Jose we lose a 6th round pick for nothing. If he doesn't see the ice we lose a 7th round pick for nothing.

It's just a 6/7th, but its still basically throwing it in the garbage.

I think the condition is only in the playoffs. So he can get reactivated and play in the regular season and still only pay a 7th.

It's no big loss either way anyways. If he's a serviceable defenseman in the playoffs (a la Lukowich), a 6th is fine.

hockeyball 04-03-2013 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hatrick Marleau (Post 63139233)
It's a 6th if he plays in the playoffs a 7th if he doesn't play in the playoffs. Why are you so upset about trading a 7th for a depth Dman?

I'm not upset, I just am not hearing any reasoning from anybody on why this is a good thing. Sure it wasn't a terribly costly stupid move, but it is a stupid move.

I think people here are having romantic notions about getting the band back together. Hannan was terrible 3 years ago, he's gotten significantly worse since then. He's much worse than Murray, statistically. I would literally rather ice Petrecki, Tennyson, anyone because at least, even if they suck, they are probably improving. Hannan is only getting worse.

Hold the Pickles 04-03-2013 12:10 PM

So, wondering if people would have rather had Huskins for the same pick. I mean, How bad is Hannan now?

sjshark91 04-03-2013 12:10 PM

hahahahahah signing

hockeyball 04-03-2013 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hold the Pickles (Post 63139663)
So, wondering if people would have rather had Huskins for the same pick. I mean, How bad is Hannan now?

Absolutely, Huskins is much better than Hannan.

ChompChomp 04-03-2013 12:11 PM

Stuart...Hannan...So basically DW's last ditch effort to save his job is to put back together the 03-04 squad?? :sarcasm:

What's next? Korky finally comes back from Russia? :laugh:

Requin 04-03-2013 12:11 PM

Guys I am the happiest of the happys right now. You don't even know. I'm freaking out. :vhappy:

Okay so I might possibly admit that maybe he is not very good and stuff. But dude, my favorite Shark ever just came home. Best 1-day-late birthday present ever.

Hold the Pickles 04-03-2013 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockeyball (Post 63139753)
Absolutely, Huskins is much better than Hannan.

Damn. Didn't husky also play forward for us? That could've been nice with Burnzy at RW. If anything happenedd to a dman in game, they could've swapped those two to help on D.

KirbyDots 04-03-2013 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChompChomp (Post 63139831)
Stuart...Hannan...So basically DW's last ditch effort to save his job is to put back together the 03-04 squad?? :sarcasm:

What's next? Korky finally comes back from Russia? :laugh:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.