HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Nashville Predators (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=33)
-   -   Speculation: How much would it take for Poile to trade the 4th pick away (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1416851)

1stLineCottonCandy 04-30-2013 05:33 PM

How much would it take for Poile to trade the 4th pick away
 
Not saying I want it to happen but have been seeming rumors about him getting calls from gms being interested

WartracePred 04-30-2013 05:57 PM

Poile said we would draft a forward at the 4th pick UNLESS he trades it. So it's a possibility.

Enoch 04-30-2013 06:16 PM

It would need to be massive. I mean, you have bare minimum of Barkov sitting there at 4 who would likely be the number 1 pick in next years draft. What would it take to acquire the number 1 overall pick next year?

I would think multiple first rounders and on ice talent simply due to the top heavy nature of this draft.

Top 6 Spaling 04-30-2013 06:24 PM

Hopefully it'd take a forward better than Barkov.

MoserHockey 04-30-2013 06:28 PM

I really hope he don't trade the pick if we don't get an massive overpayment

RaiderDoug 04-30-2013 07:02 PM

I hope Poile has the Barkov jersey made up, and then goes on vacation until June.

No need to overthink this, short of Edmonton offering up one of thier young guns, just take Barkov.

Barkov.

adsfan 04-30-2013 07:25 PM

One first round pick, one second round, one conditional pick (no lower than a fourth round) and Poile quits his job!

BTW, I am not kidding about any of the above items!

1stLineCottonCandy 04-30-2013 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaiderDoug (Post 64979129)
I hope Poile has the Barkov jersey made up, and then goes on vacation until June.

No need to overthink this, short of Edmonton offering up one of thier young guns, just take Barkov.

Barkov.

That's what I am afraid of there is too much wanting to fix this and trying to much

worstfaceoffmanever 04-30-2013 08:22 PM

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_D_Z-D2tzi1.../s400/ALOT.png

deanwormer 05-01-2013 10:38 AM

It seems to me the only way you trade this pick is if you're close to being a contender; otherwise, you draft your piece, develop him with FF and move along. I suppose if EDM wanted to move one of their kids then maybe, but that's essentially the same thing with a little more experience. Otherwise - think massive overpayment, then double it.

PredsV82 05-01-2013 03:54 PM

it would take a deal I seriously doubt any GM in his right mind would be willing to give.

The only return that would make sense would be a young, established top line center already signed long term, and I dont see the Hawks giving us Toews, the Isles giving us Tavares, or the Pens giving us Malkin or Crosby, so I dont think I can see a scenario that makes sense for us to trade

maplepred 05-01-2013 05:05 PM

Why do people keep saying they would do the move for one of oilers kids??

Id rather have barkov than most of them anyways to be honest. Maybe that's just my insane opinion, but barkov is amazing and has so much size. Just love him as a prospect!

Iron Duke 05-01-2013 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maplepred (Post 65041489)
Why do people keep saying they would do the move for one of oilers kids??

Id rather have barkov than most of them anyways to be honest. Maybe that's just my insane opinion, but barkov is amazing and has so much size. Just love him as a prospect!

Also has something that most of their kids don't: size, and a two-way game.

dulzhok 05-01-2013 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maplepred (Post 65041489)
Why do people keep saying they would do the move for one of oilers kids??

Id rather have barkov than most of them anyways to be honest. Maybe that's just my insane opinion, but barkov is amazing and has so much size. Just love him as a prospect!

Now I'm buying into the hype-- he's also young, just a few days away from qualifying from 2014 draft. And has put up numbers against men, including NHL players during the lockout.

We'll see...

PredsV82 05-01-2013 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maplepred (Post 65041489)
Why do people keep saying they would do the move for one of oilers kids??

Id rather have barkov than most of them anyways to be honest. Maybe that's just my insane opinion, but barkov is amazing and has so much size. Just love him as a prospect!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iron Duke (Post 65042903)
Also has something that most of their kids don't: size, and a two-way game.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dulzhok (Post 65043061)
Now I'm buying into the hype-- he's also young, just a few days away from qualifying from 2014 draft. And has put up numbers against men, including NHL players during the lockout.

We'll see...

another thing is he is at the beginning of his contract lifespan. any of the oil players would be several years closer to contract re-negotiation/free agency

If the talent level is similar I would just as soon have him for the next 3 years on an ELC... by the time thats over with an he gets big money both Fisher and Gaustads contracts will be off the books

Top 6 Spaling 05-01-2013 06:21 PM

On the trade boards, a BUF fan and I are tossing around the idea of Vanek+#8 for SK+#4...

I really want to keep the pick, but I'm not sure Vanek+Monahan/Lindholm isn't better than Barkov+SK, especially if Vanek re-signs.

Predsrule 05-01-2013 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Top 6 Spaling (Post 65046675)
On the trade boards, a BUF fan and I are tossing around the idea of Vanek+#8 for SK+#4...

I really want to keep the pick, but I'm not sure Vanek+Monahan/Lindholm isn't better than Barkov+SK, especially if Vanek re-signs.

if its Lindholm i do it easy.. but I dot think he will be there at 8. ether way id be tempted to do this.

RaiderDoug 05-01-2013 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maplepred (Post 65041489)
Why do people keep saying they would do the move for one of oilers kids??

Id rather have barkov than most of them anyways to be honest. Maybe that's just my insane opinion, but barkov is amazing and has so much size. Just love him as a prospect!

Hall's a ppg player and Yakupov might have a higher upside. Wed be very lucky if anyone we pick at 4 turns out to be as good as either of them.


Not that i think the oilers would do that.

triggrman 05-01-2013 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dulzhok (Post 65043061)
Now I'm buying into the hype-- he's also young, just a few days away from qualifying from 2014 draft. And has put up numbers against men, including NHL players during the lockout.

We'll see...

Easy to see this kids upside, I'm buying in more and more.

Dave is a killer 05-02-2013 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iron Duke (Post 65042903)
Also has something that most of their kids don't: size, and a two-way game.

agreed ... 6-3 205 ... I'm really starting to buy into this kid's upside

thecloser 05-02-2013 10:47 PM

simply put we need to draft Barkov and also try to make a move for Vanek.

Forsberg, barkov, vanek??

Dave is a killer 05-02-2013 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thecloser (Post 65156367)
simply put we need to draft Barkov and also try to make a move for Vanek.

Forsberg, barkov, vanek??

Give me Clarkson, instead of Vanek

Byrddog 05-03-2013 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thecloser (Post 65156367)
simply put we need to draft Barkov and also try to make a move for Vanek.

Forsberg, barkov, vanek??



Trotz would frickin meltdown. Just wander arround babbling Two way two way two way.

101st_fan 05-03-2013 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Byrddog (Post 65178989)
Trotz would frickin meltdown. Just wander arround babbling Two way two way two way.

The same way he did when Kariya, Sullivan, Arnott, and Dumont were on our top 6? :shakehead

Yzlamic Preacher* 05-15-2013 11:58 AM

Tampa fan coming in peace. Just wondering, would you guys do 3 + for 4 + Josi? Or 3 + 4th round for 4 + Blum. Drouin is the type of creative franchise player you might be looking for. If Mackinnon is there (not likely) even better for you guys. Again just curious, I know how high you guys hold Josi, and I really want to know what the plus would be considering the difference in potential from Drouin/Mackinnon to Barkov/Lindholm/Monahan/Nichuskin


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.