HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Buffalo Sabres (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   Rfa (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1466087)

Wisent42 07-09-2013 06:18 PM

Rfa
 
Maybe there's a thread on this already and if so, I appologize, but I haven't seen it.

Hodgson, Hackett, Tropp, Flynn and a couple of other players still are not signed to new contracts. I haven't seen any reports on ongoing contract discussion. What's happening? Should we be worried? I understand that if another team makes an offer the Sabres front office has a chance to match the offer, or be compensated, and there's the arbitration route, but still; what's the hold up? Is it common that contract negotiations with RFA players take time?

Paxon 07-09-2013 06:35 PM

I'm not worried about it yet and it's not uncommon for RFAs to not be dealt with at this point of the offseason. Hopefully they all get done soon, though.

Jacob582 07-09-2013 06:58 PM

Paul Hamilton didn't have kind words for Rich Winter (Hodgson's agent).

SackTastic 07-09-2013 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wisent42 (Post 68995201)
Maybe there's a thread on this already and if so, I appologize, but I haven't seen it.

Hodgson, Hackett, Tropp, Flynn and a couple of other players still are not signed to new contracts. I haven't seen any reports on ongoing contract discussion. What's happening? Should we be worried? I understand that if another team makes an offer the Sabres front office has a chance to match the offer, or be compensated, and there's the arbitration route, but still; what's the hold up? Is it common that contract negotiations with RFA players take time?

Yes, because there is no time pressure in July to get them taken care of.

Once a team extends a qualifying offer to their own RFA, that player's right's are locked to that team. The only option the player would have is not to sign the QO, and have someone sign them to an offer sheet. In practice, this is very rare.

They'll get taken care of. Don't sweat it.

Wisent42 07-09-2013 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SackTastic (Post 68998033)
Yes, because there is no time pressure in July to get them taken care of.

Once a team extends a qualifying offer to their own RFA, that player's right's are locked to that team. The only option the player would have is not to sign the QO, and have someone sign them to an offer sheet. In practice, this is very rare.

They'll get taken care of. Don't sweat it.

Thanks. I was unsure on the QO-part, thanks for clearing that up.

Djp 07-09-2013 10:41 PM

Hodgson is one Im concerned about.

ytopp, Flynn, Hackett, Adam, and others Im not worried about. dont see them being Offer sheeted.

Hodgson is a player that could be offer sheeted.

My opinion they just follow the Ennis model and do a 2-3 yr bridge contract. Maybe a 3/$10M contract where next year its like $2.75M, $3.25M, and $4.00M

Old Navy Goat 07-09-2013 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Djp (Post 69005143)
Hodgson is one Im concerned about.

ytopp, Flynn, Hackett, Adam, and others Im not worried about. dont see them being Offer sheeted.

Hodgson is a player that could be offer sheeted.

My opinion they just follow the Ennis model and do a 2-3 yr bridge contract. Maybe a 3/$10M contract where next year its like $2.75M, $3.25M, and $4.00M

Ennis isn't the type of player anyone would waste an offer sheet on. Buffalo isn't up against the cap so it wouldn't accomplish anything unless it was a severe over-payment, in which case that's a stupid move from the offering team.

Paxon 07-10-2013 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Navy Goat (Post 69006763)
Ennis isn't the type of player anyone would waste an offer sheet on. Buffalo isn't up against the cap so it wouldn't accomplish anything unless it was a severe over-payment, in which case that's a stupid move from the offering team.

I assume you mean Hodgson, not Ennis. I could see a team offer-sheeting Hodgson because it wouldn't be crazy draft pick compensation.

wunderpanda 07-10-2013 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacob582 (Post 68996535)
Paul Hamilton didn't have kind words for Rich Winter (Hodgson's agent).

What was said? I couldn't find any info about this.

Jacob582 07-10-2013 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wunderpanda (Post 69011379)
What was said? I couldn't find any info about this.

It was a WGR radio interview.

I think he was asked if we should be worried about the Hodgson negotiations.

He said something like: yes, because Rich Winter is an idiot to deal with.

Karate Johnson* 07-10-2013 04:47 AM

I hope someone offer sheets Hodgson for a bunch of picks. He's not that good.

Paxon 07-10-2013 04:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karate Johnson (Post 69011709)
I hope someone offer sheets Hodgson for a bunch of picks. He's not that good.

The most we'd get is a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. I wouldn't take it unless it's from a team like Florida.

Deevo 07-10-2013 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacob582 (Post 69011671)
It was a WGR radio interview.

I think he was asked if we should be worried about the Hodgson negotiations.

He said something like: yes, because Rich Winter is an idiot to deal with.

Winter is notoriously painful to deal with. We'll be paying for Hodgson.

Deevo 07-10-2013 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karate Johnson (Post 69011709)
I hope someone offer sheets Hodgson for a bunch of picks. He's not that good.

What is your basis for this? His defensive play?


Hodgson was our best forward in the offensive zone last year IMO.

Jacob582 07-10-2013 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deevo (Post 69012921)
Winter is notoriously painful to deal with. We'll be paying for Hodgson.

I think he will sign just before training camp.

Jacob582 07-10-2013 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deevo (Post 69012941)
What is your basis for this? His defensive play?


Hodgson was our best forward in the offensive zone last year IMO.

except on the PP.

Clock 07-10-2013 07:45 AM

The timing is good for Hodgson, at least. Lock him in now for a long-ish term at a cap hit that might be high for now while we have plenty of cap space. As the cap increases and we need to re-sign the other youngsters down the road and we need the space, that hit likely won't seem as bad. Hopefully.

stokes84 07-10-2013 08:06 AM

I've been worried about this Hodgson negotiation since he was traded here. He was moved here with a sense of entitlement. If it is going poorly like ROR did last year, I wouldn't be shocked to see him moved.

gallagt01 07-10-2013 08:23 AM

Not worried in the least.

Old Navy Goat 07-10-2013 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Paxon (Post 69007829)
I assume you mean Hodgson, not Ennis. I could see a team offer-sheeting Hodgson because it wouldn't be crazy draft pick compensation.

You are correct, typing while skyping with an interesting view had me a tad bit distracted

hizzoner 07-10-2013 09:21 AM

I think that the lousy draft pick compensation system for RFAs is unfair. Why can Chicago offersheet Hodgson for example a 5 year deal for $25 million and only pay out the 30th and 90th overall picks? Meanwhile Florida has to offer up number 1 overall and the 61st. Why this bias in favour of the better teams? Chicago could dump an aging vet and the team that loses the player gets hosed--or has its rebuilding under the cap screwed. I have suggested that there needs to be some valuation of the picks---it cannot be perfect of course-but maybe a top ten pick is worth 2 picks in the last third of the round and an extra second for the mid ten. I do not want to stop the movement of players but some fairer system ought to be devised.
As to Hodgson--I would be happy to see him get PK Subban money and terms....

SackTastic 07-10-2013 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hizzoner (Post 69015705)
I think that the lousy draft pick compensation system for RFAs is unfair. Why can Chicago offersheet Hodgson for example a 5 year deal for $25 million and only pay out the 30th and 90th overall picks? Meanwhile Florida has to offer up number 1 overall and the 61st. Why this bias in favour of the better teams? Chicago could dump an aging vet and the team that loses the player gets hosed--or has its rebuilding under the cap screwed. I have suggested that there needs to be some valuation of the picks---it cannot be perfect of course-but maybe a top ten pick is worth 2 picks in the last third of the round and an extra second for the mid ten. I do not want to stop the movement of players but some fairer system ought to be devised.
As to Hodgson--I would be happy to see him get PK Subban money and terms....

What are you talking about? There's no bias.

For a 5/$25 offer sheet, a team would have to give up their 1st and 3rd. It MUST be their own picks, not picks acquired by trade. WHERE those picks are isn't really relevant. If Florida has a crappy year, and has the 1st overall, then they have to take that into consideration if they want to present that offer sheet. Maybe they can better use that 1st overall in another move instead of offer sheeting.

Either way, this argument is pretty weak IMO.

Old Navy Goat 07-10-2013 11:12 AM

Additionally, its not like you sign someone to an offer sheet expecting to suck that year and finish in the lottery. The offer sheet is used to acquire that final piece you think will put you over the top, hence why you don't see them tossed around for 2nd tier players outside of the Blues-Canucks pissing match a few years ago with Kesler. The Flyers looked at Weber as being that final piece and that they wouldn't acquire anyone of significance drafting at the end of the 1st round. IMO, if you go out and sign an offer sheet, and crap out then you got what you deserved.

stokes84 07-10-2013 11:26 AM

The Rangers are knocking out their RFAs one after another. Why do we always delay with these things?

jBuds 07-10-2013 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stokes84 (Post 69020705)
The Rangers are knocking out their RFAs one after another. Why do we always delay with these things?

There's no delay, man. We have time.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.