HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   New York Rangers (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   Player Discussion: replacing Derek Dorsett in lineup and roster (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1622961)

Punxrocknyc19* 03-12-2014 02:44 PM

replacing Derek Dorsett in lineup and roster
 
a lot of fans from the Bluejackets said the Rangers would love this guy.. i just dont see it :help:

Amazing Kreiderman 03-12-2014 02:53 PM

They can have him back. Trade for Anisimov

Thirty One 03-12-2014 02:55 PM

Where is the Derek Dorsett option?

NYRKindms 03-12-2014 02:58 PM

I say we keep him. He was the only guy sticking up for his teammates before he broke his leg and has been good in the bottom 6.

At least let him get back in it before we ship him out.

Didn't look horrible on the line with Richards last night and they were able to get a little energy going.

ecemleafs 03-12-2014 03:15 PM

he was actually one of our best players last night. pretty much the only one that forechecked.

AHB* 03-12-2014 03:21 PM

He tries hard, but he's just not a good hockey player. Also extremely undersized for his role and unlike someone like Prust, he doesn't seem to have the body strength to "play bigger."

He loses so many board battles, has hands of stone and is a below average skater.

At this point, Carcillo should be in. Stop messing with chemistry.

IF we make the playoffs and Carcillo got injured, roll with JT.

nikonsniper* 03-12-2014 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Punxrocknyc19 (Post 81563567)
a lot of fans from the Bluejackets said the Rangers would love this guy.. i just dont see it :help:

I remember CBJ fans telling us he was their fan fav, and we would like him better than Moore and Brass

TheTakedown764 03-12-2014 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikonsniper (Post 81565373)
I remember CBJ fans telling us he was their fan fav, and we would like him better than Moore and Brass

Meanwhile Moore has cleaned up his defensive game somewhat, and his offensive game is just starting to flourish, while Brass was a god in the 2013 playoffs lol.

Like I said in a previous thread, Dorsett is a player with lots of awesome intangibles, but you only notice them when he's playing good hockey. otherwise, he blows.

Miller Time NYR 03-12-2014 03:34 PM

I thought he had a good game last night, but at this point its him vs Carcillo for the 4th line spot and I would rather have Carcillo there.

TheTakedown764 03-12-2014 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SwedishBullet62 (Post 81565705)
I thought he had a good game last night, but at this point its him vs Carcillo for the 4th line spot and I would rather have Carcillo there.

agree with the bolded. Dorsett, unfortunately, has simply become a 4th line roster spot casualty because of an untimely injury. Nobody is at fault, and AV is doing the right thing trying to play him to see where he fits. Unfortunately, we're finding that he simply does not, and at that point you have to cut your losses (or winnings, in this case) and move on from that player.

As i said, he has a year left on his contract, and he's a mere $1.67M cap hit, you trade him for a 3rd or 4th round pick. He's a solid pick up for teams looking for a 4th line guy

silverfish 03-12-2014 03:43 PM

The Dorsett hate on this board is so out of proportion it's crazy.

DD was not the reason the Rangers lost last night.

I'd put DD in the lineup for DD. Let him get his legs back. He's an effective fourth-liner who can PK.

KreiMeARiver* 03-12-2014 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silverfish (Post 81566093)
The Dorsett hate on this board is so out of proportion it's crazy.

DD was not the reason the Rangers lost last night.

I'd put DD in the lineup for DD. Let him get his legs back. He's an effective fourth-liner who can PK.

When he's in, they lose...

Get him out of here. He is redundant with Carcillo here. And him over Miller makes me want to chuck a baby off a cliff.

DMPD 03-12-2014 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -31- (Post 81564035)
Where is the Derek Dorsett option?

This.

Why does he need to be replaced? Great thread. :dunce:

DMPD 03-12-2014 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KreiMeARiver (Post 81566197)
When he's in, they lose...

Get him out of here. He is redundant with Carcillo here. And him over Miller makes me want to chuck a baby off a cliff.

Completely rational post. :whine:

E-Train 03-12-2014 03:57 PM

Come on Jorts. You would have a whole lineup of Dorsetts but now you're pandering to the large contingent here that hates Dorsett. I don't care either way if he stays or not but this thread will be another debacle.

silverfish 03-12-2014 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ail (Post 81566227)
This.

Why does he need to be replaced? Great thread. :dunce:

Hey! We agree on a Rangers topic!

*Air five*

KreiMeARiver* 03-12-2014 03:59 PM

We have Carcillo...a more effective version of Dorsett.

aka Dorsett is expendable. Get rid of him.

ecemleafs 03-12-2014 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KreiMeARiver (Post 81566859)
We have Carcillo...a more effective version of Dorsett.

aka Dorsett is expendable. Get rid of him.

carcillo has shown nothing that hes more effective than dorsett. dorsett has played like 3 games. one of them hes played really well.

Bleed Ranger Blue 03-12-2014 04:13 PM

I dont really see the need to have a pest on the 4th line when nobody on lines 1-3 can answer the bell for what Dorsett may have started.

I thought Carcillo has played like an idiot his entire career, but he hasn't here yet.

Idlerlee 03-12-2014 04:18 PM

Did we forget Dorsett had a really good stretch of games before he got injured already ? That being said I'm sold on what Carcillo is supposed to contribute to the team, he's good enough

theFiGS 03-12-2014 04:21 PM

Carcillo adds a lot more than dorsett does, he was good in the beginning of the year but Carcillo is a better option on the 4th line.

Krampus 03-12-2014 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silverfish (Post 81566775)
Hey! We agree on a Rangers topic!

*Air five*

Don't look now, but we do too...

Punxrocknyc19* 03-12-2014 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bleed Ranger Blue (Post 81567395)
I dont really see the need to have a pest on the 4th line when nobody on lines 1-3 can answer the bell for what Dorsett may have started.

I thought Carcillo has played like an idiot his entire career, but he hasn't here yet.

Dorsett runs Crosby and then Engellend runs Richards and is out for the year. :help: that is what would happened if Dorsett did something because Rangers dont have enough grit or toughness to stick up for themselves... id rather have a pest with some size... id rather take a chance on Z. Kassian M.Foligno Simmonds B.Schenn J.Nolan but every team has at least one forward like that with size and grit except the Rangers..

Callagraves 03-12-2014 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KreiMeARiver (Post 81566859)
We have Carcillo...a more effective version of Dorsett.

aka Dorsett is expendable. Get rid of him.

Carcillo really isn't even as good as Dorsett in any aspect.

pld459666 03-12-2014 06:34 PM

some systems are not for some players.

My gut tells me that he would be fine in a Torts system of dump and chase, but where and when the coach is going to ask players to display a actual skill, Dorsett is going to leave you wanting.

not a bad player, just limited in what he can do.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.