HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Tampa Bay Lightning (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Top 20 (finally) (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=188847)

Erik 11-07-2005 02:22 PM

Top 20 (finally)
 
http://www.hockeysfuture.com/article.php?sid=8065

Rogers ranked 4th despite nearly cracking the NHL roster at 19. :shakehead

Oh yeah, and Ranger 9th despite being one of our most consistent NHL defensemen this year.

Also don't like the order they put the goalies in, Ramo goes above Coleman IMO.

petec1978* 11-07-2005 02:41 PM

The oversight was Keller.

HeShootzNscores 11-07-2005 02:44 PM

eklund...?

Erik 11-07-2005 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HeShootzNscores
eklund...?

Graduated. (he's 25)

petec1978* 11-07-2005 02:55 PM

Yep. Hard to believe, but Eks is a gray beard.

Oceanic39* 11-07-2005 03:15 PM

Poor Keller.

And lucky Tobin. If he wasn't taken early in the draft, he likely wouldn't be on there.

petec1978* 11-07-2005 03:25 PM

There are 5-6 guys more deserving than Tobin, no doubt. And Lawrence getting into the top-20 is AWFUL.

petec1978* 11-07-2005 03:41 PM

BTW let the record show these rankings were so bad that Phil Laugher posted an apology claiming he was just posting what he was told to. I saw it. My guess is Erik and quite a few others here saw it too (feel free to post here corroborating the fact). Don't know whether he pulled the post of his own volition or if the powers that be pulled it... but that says a lot IMO.

Oceanic39* 11-07-2005 03:44 PM

Well, we can't use stats to develop rankings.

That's kookie-talk.

Erik 11-07-2005 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boltprospects
BTW let the record show these rankings were so bad that Phil Laugher posted an apology claiming he was just posting what he was told to. I saw it. My guess is Erik and quite a few others here saw it too (feel free to post here corroborating the fact). Don't know whether he pulled the post of his own volition or if the powers that be pulled it... but that says a lot IMO.

I saw it. I went to respond to it, and it disappeared.
:confused:

petec1978* 11-07-2005 04:09 PM

It was Tarnasky at 19. That was the biggest part of his apology.

joeminus 11-07-2005 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boltprospects
And Lawrence getting into the top-20 is AWFUL.

Lawrence making the top 20 is a joke. Lawrence making the top 13 is a friggin' travesty.

And Tobin makes the list while Keller does not? Puh-leeze.

Mihalik shoots to No. 2 based on ... what? Oh, that's right -- he was a first-round pick so he's automatically a god in HF Land.

abbeyroad58 11-08-2005 09:43 AM

I don't know whether to :biglaugh: or :cry:. HF is obviously :confused:

So if R2 is 4th, Ranger is 9th and Tarnasky 19th, how the heck did they leap frog over the so-called higher ranked prospects and are with the big club. Give credit where credit is due. :shakehead


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.