HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Montreal Canadiens (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Naslund = Koivu = GOD, we need to trade for him (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=320006)

FF de Mars 12-08-2006 09:59 PM

Naslund = Koivu = GOD, we need to trade for him
 
I was watching a Canucks game, and I understood that Naslund, on the Canucks, is the equivalent of Koivu on our team. The only difference is that Koivu is a better playmaker and Nalslund is a better scorer. The way they play, they look the same. They are the face of their franchise, they are captains, they work hard on the ice and they have skills. If the Canucks are in the dead end and if they think they will miss the playoffs, we might have a chance to trade for Naslund. Imagine a first line with two Koivu, one who can pass and one who can score. Here would be my lines

Lats-Koivu-Naslund
Higgins-Grabs-Kovalev

cjbhab 12-08-2006 10:06 PM

where the hell does grabs come into play?

hototogisu 12-08-2006 10:06 PM

So if we're not trading Higgins, Koivu, Kovalev, Latendresse or Grabovski to get Naslund, exactly how DO we manage to get him in a Habs uniform? Would you trade your team captain for Ryder and Samsonov...?

znk 12-08-2006 10:09 PM

I cant even see post #1. I think this is great!

cjbhab 12-08-2006 10:09 PM

So grabs magically gets into a habs uniform because we got nazzy? I smell ********.

SpreeEndaz 12-08-2006 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hototogisu (Post 7301287)
Would you trade your team captain for Ryder and Samsonov...?

If you add in Garth Murray, I think we have a deal, sir !

cjbhab 12-08-2006 10:13 PM

garth murray is worse than fricken sewage mixed with trash that is stirred in with dog and cat ****.

SpreeEndaz 12-08-2006 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cjbhab (Post 7301333)
garth murray is worse than fricken sewage mixed with trash that is stirred in with dog and cat ****.

DAMMIT! Don't scream it, you want Nonis to hear you?

Le Maroons 12-08-2006 10:16 PM

Quite the second line center you got there!

znk 12-08-2006 10:19 PM

Can someone quote him...

Le Maroons 12-08-2006 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FF de Mars (Post 7301230)
I was watching a Canucks game, and I understood that Naslund, on the Canucks, is the equivalent of Koivu on our team. The only difference is that Koivu is a better playmaker and Nalslund is a better scorer. The way they play, they look the same. They are the face of their franchise, they are captains, they work hard on the ice and they have skills. If the Canucks are in the dead end and if they think they will miss the playoffs, we might have a chance to trade for Naslund. Imagine a first line with two Koivu, one who can pass and one who can score. Here would be my lines

Lats-Koivu-Naslund
Higgins-Grabs-Kovalev

Quote:

Originally Posted by znk (Post 7301389)
Can someone quote him...


Hackett 12-08-2006 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FF de Mars (Post 7301230)
I was watching a Canucks game, and I understood that Naslund, on the Canucks, is the equivalent of Koivu on our team. The only difference is that Koivu is a better playmaker and Nalslund is a better scorer. The way they play, they look the same. They are the face of their franchise, they are captains, they work hard on the ice and they have skills. If the Canucks are in the dead end and if they think they will miss the playoffs, we might have a chance to trade for Naslund. Imagine a first line with two Koivu, one who can pass and one who can score. Here would be my lines

Lats-Koivu-Naslund
Higgins-Grabs-Kovalev

here you go z

znk 12-08-2006 10:33 PM

Thank you both!

ChemiseBleuHonnete 12-08-2006 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by znk (Post 7301510)
Thank you both!

It wasn't that bad... But why would the nucks trade Naslund? I gotta agree that it doesn't make sense.

FF de Mars 12-08-2006 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by franchise player (Post 7301556)
It wasn't that bad... But why would the nucks trade Naslund? I gotta agree that it doesn't make sense.

Because they will miss the playoffs, because they will start rebuilding, because we will try to make it further in the playoffs. If we offer them Kost, a first and maybe something else, they would look at it, look at what kind of impact this kind of package could have in 2-3 years. They could pull the trigger, they could bite, considering Naslund makes 6M a year, considering they get a lot of assets for the future, considering they clear up a lot of cap space.

FF de Mars 12-08-2006 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by znk (Post 7301389)
Can someone quote him...

I guess I have a bad rep for the whole french on this board issue. Because of this, I am on a couple of person's ignore list. If you wish, you can remove me from this list as will not bring up the whole french issue on that board. Thanks :)

Le Maroons 12-08-2006 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by znk (Post 7301510)
Thank you both!

Quote:

Originally Posted by FF de Mars (Post 7301724)
I guess I have a bad rep for the whole french on this board issue. Because of this, I am on a couple of person's ignore list. If you wish, you can remove me from this list as will not bring up the whole french issue on that board. Thanks :)

time to make up Z?

Squeaky 12-08-2006 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FF de Mars (Post 7301709)
Because they will miss the playoffs, because they will start rebuilding, because we will try to make it further in the playoffs. If we offer them Kost, a first and maybe something else, they would look at it, look at what kind of impact this kind of package could have in 2-3 years. They could pull the trigger, they could bite, considering Naslund makes 6M a year, considering they get a lot of assets for the future, considering they clear up a lot of cap space.

Doesn't Naslund have a no trade clause? I think he's happy in Vancouver.

Also, he makes 6 million a year. You have to make room against the cap to add that salary.

FF de Mars 12-08-2006 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Le Maroons (Post 7301360)
Quite the second line center you got there!

I'd like to give him a chance, to see what he can do in the NHL, to see if he can be our second line center this year, since we have none and he's the best candidate. I'd like to know if he can do the job or not, because if he can't, we just have to trade for a second line center who will be a UFA. Since the Pleks and Kovalev options have failed, I'd like to see the Grabovski option, I'd like to see if he can really be a second line center in the NHL. He played hockey all his life, he played pro in Russia, he played in the AHL, it's time for the NHL, especially since we have a whole at his position.

FF de Mars 12-08-2006 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Le Maroons (Post 7301739)
time to make up Z?

I did wake up and I want to talk about hockey, that's all. So unless you don't like other people's opinions on hockey, get me out of the ignore list. Thanks. :)

Le Maroons 12-08-2006 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FF de Mars (Post 7301766)
I'd like to give him a chance, to see what he can do in the NHL, to see if he can be our second line center this year, since we have none and he's the best candidate. I'd like to know if he can do the job or not, because if he can't, we just have to trade for a second line center who will be a UFA. Since the Pleks and Kovalev options have failed, I'd like to see the Grabovski option, I'd like to see if he can really be a second line center in the NHL. He played hockey all his life, he played pro in Russia, he played in the AHL, it's time for the NHL, especially since we have a whole at his position.

ok, so if he works out what are your lines without getting Naslund of course?

Le Maroons 12-08-2006 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FF de Mars (Post 7301783)
I did wake up and I want to talk about hockey, that's all. So unless you don't like other people's opinions on hockey, get me out of the ignore list. Thanks. :)

Anyone seen Znk around?

FF de Mars 12-08-2006 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squeaky (Post 7301751)
Doesn't Naslund have a no trade clause? I think he's happy in Vancouver.

Also, he makes 6 million a year. You have to make room against the cap to add that salary.

We can always find a way of making $ room for him. If he's available, and I think he could be since the Canucks might take the rebuilding mode, I think we should try to go for him. Think about it, if we had a very bad team, a bottom standing team, would you try to keep Koivu, or would you try to trade him for a LOT of future assets while being nice to him and send him to a winning team?

znk 12-08-2006 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Le Maroons (Post 7301739)
time to make up Z?

hummm maybe he deserve a 3rd or 4th chance....what ever its up too.

Le Maroons 12-08-2006 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FF de Mars (Post 7301819)
We can always find a way of making $ room for him. If he's available, and I think he could be since the Canucks might take the rebuilding mode, I think we should try to go for him. Think about it, if we had a very bad team, a bottom standing team, would you try to keep Koivu, or would you try to trade him for a LOT of future assets while being nice to him and send him to a winning team?

A few questions:

Does Vancouver have a very bad team?

They have a good chance at making the playoffs imo.

Does Naslund want out of Vancouver?

If so, I'm the opposite, I want in of Vancouver (that doesn't make sense, I know).

Is Koivu retiring soon or something? Is he too expensive?

I don't think so.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.