![]() |
Boston - Columbus
CBJ gets:
P. Bergeron T. Rask 1st 09 1st 10 BOS gets: Rick Nash Close value wise? |
Quote:
|
No thanks. Nash (although he hasn't had a great surrounding cast) hasn't put up numbers to warrant this kind of return. 2 Franchise players AND 2 first round picks for a guy who has a career high 69 points. I'll pass.
|
Quote:
I'd say value wise pretty good proposal. However if I were Howson I would wait one year to see what the possible effects could be with Bergeron and his concussion. Please revert back to last year and Jarret Stoll |
The bruins don't even consider this. If they wanted to trade for nash it would probably be a package with Kessel....Not a package with our 2 franchise players. If Rask is traded were stuck with a goaltending prospect who....well, he's not Rask. Nash is one of my top 5 favorite NHL players, but for what he's done there is no way he should get this kind of return.
|
IMO, Boston gets the short end of the stick here.
|
No way, that is some desperate overrating of Rick Nash.
|
Quote:
this is awful on all accounts. |
People here should just stop making proposals with their favourite team and Boston. Every single one of them have been terrible.
|
Quote:
|
Cbus gets nothing they want out of this deal. HF value wise they may win; But in the NHL GMs don't trade for value. They trade to improve their team.
Assuming a full recovery, Bergeron will be a very good player. Nash IS right now a franchise player. Cbus has LeClaire. Why do they want a potentially good goalie? What do they do with those draft picks? They can't score, they can't defend, they can't sell tickets. If you think Nash would help Boston, offer something that will improve Cbus now, not in 2013. |
This just doesn't make sense for Boston, Bergeron is the face of our franchise one on one with a little extra from Boston like maybe 1 first round pick would be fine. Rask is projected by HF to have the talent to be a top 5 goalie in the NHL some day. two first round picks are important in the Modern NHL where you cant sign a team, although the Rangers sure try.
|
How about
Marco Sturm Phil Kessel Brad Marchand for Rick Nash |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I could see this Nash to Bruins thing working out (although it would suck because we play them 6 times a year). Anyways, if the Bruins wanted Nash, they should give up their 1st round pick.
The Bruins with Nash would definitely not be low in the standings. They would be competing with Montreal for the top of the division. If they gave up their 1st rounder, they wouldn't lose any key players. Maybe their 1st, Sturm and a prospect or two would get CBJ to bite. But for the 1st proposal.. :facepalm: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And Hamil instead of Marchand wouldn't make it better, hell, adding Hamil to that deal wouldn't make it much better. |
Lets check. What is about Kronwall for Nash straight.... Is there anybody to bite?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
but your proposal.. :facepalm: |
Quote:
EDIT: I don't want Rask. We've got Leclaire and Mason. So that part didn't even matter to me. |
That's quite a lot Boston is giving up. Columbus fans, what 1 player would you be willing to give up:
09 #1 10 #1 Leclaire Voracek for?? maybe you think that's worth more than what Boston is giving up, but really it's pretty close. You are talking about a young established player who is one of the cornerstones of the team (Leclaire/Bergeron), the #1 prospect of the team (Voracek/Rask) and 2 #1s. Whether you think those 4 Columbus assets are worth more is irrelevant because that really is the comparable type of package you are asking Boston to give up. That's quite a lot, and more than I'd be willing to give. |
Columbus does not trade Rick Nash.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.