Proposal and opinion
M.Ohlund (UFA end of year, but still...)
Lucic is a good player, but a top class coward. All I m going to say is: Thornton VS Begin...............
Vancouver have a great goalie prospect, why would they want Halak?
IMHO it's too much of our future to give up. Granted, you probably have to overpay to get Burrows included. But I don't think we need to overpay that much. Plus I don't see why they'd have an interest in Halak at all. They have Schneider who seems to be just as hot as Halak in the AHL and just as ready for an NHL chance.
Ohlund would be a nice pickup, but again, I think we're a couple months away from finding out which impending-UFAs really are going to be available for us to acquire. They can't afford to deal him now. And if they're in a solid playoff spot, which I expect they will be, they'd be smarter just to keep him this season and then let him walk in the summer.
The Canucks don't need Halak and Burrows is a lot more important for them than the value he would have in a trade.
I would not be ready to trade Higgins in a deal for Ohlund (since he is an UFA and that he would only be a rental).
|All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 AM.|
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.