![]() |
(#50): 1/19/2010 • Tampa Bay Lightning @ New York Rangers • 7:00pm • VS (HD)
|
I'm getting sick of Versus. Rangers vs Penguins again next week on Versus. :shakehead
Anyway 3-2 Rangers. |
I'm getting sick of them too, any chance we can get a lineup of the commentators for the versus games? so I can decided how I want to watch this.
|
Hopefully they play the way they played in the last 40 minutes of the game Sunday night. More specifically exactly the way they played in the second period.
Knowing this team though, I can't really be expecting that can I? |
A win would be nice.
|
Im still a little bit in shock that Slats wouldnt trade Grachev for St Louis.
|
VS? Come on. This whole thing is getting to be insane. What is Tampa playing on VS for? I hate Directv. Just settle the dispute so I can watch the game at home.:rant:
|
Wish I could expect the same kind of effort we saw Sunday, but the Rangers have done that before only to revert back to their old ways.
That being said Tampa is another low scoring team so the playing field is pretty leveled here. |
Welp, off to the friends house tomorrow night so I can watch Versus... damn you, DirecTV.
Anyways, LGR! |
:banana: I'm flying up to New York tomorrow at 6am. Chilling in the City until Saturday, but that's irrelevant...
Anyway, I'll be going to this game. Section 211! :yo: Let's go Rangers! Let's play like we did in the 2nd and 3rd periods against the Habs! Hopefully, we play 60 minutes instead of 40! I say 4-1 Rangers. Gaborik with two. |
We owe them one for the last meeting.
Let's go Rangers! :handclap: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If nothing else it just shows how we as fans tend to overvalue our prospects. |
Avery vs. Downie
hope so |
**** versus
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Soon to be 35 year old with a $5.25MM per year contract added to a team that won't win the cup anyway this year... in exchange for a kid who could be a potential 40 goal scorer 2-5 years down the road who won't hit UFA for another, what, 7 years? Sure, most prospects don't pan out to reach their max potential. But some do. And if you don't keep the ones that you think have the best shot, then you (obviously) don't have them when they do. Would I trade Grachev (as part of a package) for a sure thing all-star player in his prime like Kovalchuk? Absolutely. Would I trade him for a year and a half of a soon-to-hit-the-downside-of-his-career St. Louis...? Hell no. |
We're talking about a former MVP.
Grachev has nothing to his name so far except a good OHL season at age 19 and an average tournament. Im not anti-prospect, but I think when a good deal comes along you should jump on it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
edit: right as i type this i see him make a sick pass for a goal on NHL on the fly - he is still nasty |
Quote:
I dont like rentals either. But aquiring a player who yes, is still a star, he has only 5 less points than Gaborik, think what that would do for our team, is worth losing a prospect, and an overrated one. Although Grachev's stock has dropped so I doubt they would go for it now, and wed have to move cap, so its moot. |
Well, i just don't see any reason to rush into a trade when there is a next to nothing chance of the team going deep. Can always save him as part of a deal a few years down the road when the team actually stands a chance against the rest of the league.
|
Quote:
Rangers 3 Tampa 1 LGR |
will be at this game, usually try and get to the garden to avoid watching vs, ill spend any amount of money to avoid beninati's mediocrity and/or graphics of junior seau blocking half of the ice
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 AM. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.