HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Minnesota Wild (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   5/3 Discussion - Best Trade In Wild History (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=771909)

GopherState 05-03-2010 03:54 PM

5/3 Discussion - Best Trade In Wild History
 
There have been a number of trades which made a tremendous impact on the Minnesota Wild - which one made the most and why?

se7en 05-03-2010 04:18 PM

I have to go with you on Latendresse for Pouliot...

Alot of people think that the Dimitra trade was a good one but although we looked good on paper, I think that trade was the downfall of this team... Once we starting pandering to Gabby we started making bad decisions and look where that got us... granted we made bad decisions before, mainly in drafting but we tried too hard to please Gabby & I think that changed us...

Don't get me wrong, at the time I was excited & of coarse hind site is 20/20 but I think that overall, we would be a stronger team had that trade not happened... I'd think at the worst we would of had a "trade me now" situation with Gabby but seeing where we eneded up with him, that would have been a blessing in disguise...

As for the others listed, I don't think any of them had enough impact to be considered the best trade. With the Lats trade it feels like we traded a nickel for a $5 bill. So it gets my vote.


By the way, why does it say I can't vote on this poll!?

GopherState 05-03-2010 04:44 PM

I believe you have to be a member for ninety days or something to that effect.

Bookman 05-03-2010 05:52 PM

Pouliot for Latendresse looks good now. Time will tell if the Wild made out as well as it seems.

For sheer return, I picked Rolie for a 1st rounder. Would have been interesting if DR had stuck to the plan and used that pick instead of trading it away.

firstroundbust 05-03-2010 05:53 PM

technically the Roloson for #17 and the Demitra trade are essentially the same deal...we dealt 17 and O'Surly for Demitra.

Ugh.

Thanks Riser.

GopherState 05-03-2010 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bookman (Post 25609575)
Pouliot for Latendresse looks good now. Time will tell if the Wild made out as well as it seems.

For sheer return, I picked Rolie for a 1st rounder. Would have been interesting if DR had stuck to the plan and used that pick instead of trading it away.

If the 2004-2006 drafts weren't bad enough, just think about how bad a James Sheppard/Trevor Lewis combo could have pissed off fans.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeuceUNO (Post 25609596)
technically the Roloson for #17 and the Demitra trade are essentially the same deal...we dealt 17 and O'Surly for Demitra.

Ugh.

Thanks Riser.

They are related but I feel the two deals are separate enough to be considered on their own.

mnwildgophers 05-03-2010 08:23 PM

We can't really say Pouliot for Latendresse yet only because 1 good season of Latendresse probably wouldn't make this the best deal ever right? We really haven't had many big trades yet, I think we'll be seeing a great one after this year's draft (or so I hope)

State of Hockey 05-03-2010 10:59 PM

Demitra trade, hands down. That trade moved the Wild from the shadows to the limelight. In the end it only lasted two years, but those were two fun ones. Without the Demitra trade, we may be sitting at a 6 year playoff drought.

Bookman 05-04-2010 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeuceUNO (Post 25609596)
technically the Roloson for #17 and the Demitra trade are essentially the same deal...we dealt 17 and O'Surly for Demitra.

Ugh.

Thanks Riser.

Except I was happy after they traded Rolie for a first, and sad after they traded for Demitra.:cry:

BigT2002 05-04-2010 10:13 AM

Anyone who doesn't vote Benny for Latendresse needs counseling

State of Hockey 05-04-2010 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigT2002 (Post 25621534)
Anyone who doesn't vote Benny for Latendresse needs counseling

Then sign me up.

How can a trade that's 60 games old, not guaranteed of long-term benefit, and didn't get us into the playoffs beat out a trade that turned the Wild from losers to winners overnight. The entire team philosophy changed, and even free agents wanted to come here. The Demitra trade even has the Latendresse value. We traded two assets that ended up to be little. No comparison.

Bookman 05-04-2010 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by State of Hockey (Post 25623349)
Then sign me up.

How can a trade that's 60 games old, not guaranteed of long-term benefit, and didn't get us into the playoffs beat out a trade that turned the Wild from losers to winners overnight. The entire team philosophy changed, and even free agents wanted to come here. The Demitra trade even has the Latendresse value. We traded two assets that ended up to be little. No comparison.

Some might argue that the Demitra trade came too early in the Wild's history. A few more lean years and some richer drafts may have led to more sustainable success.

GopherState 05-04-2010 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bookman (Post 25624335)
Some might argue that the Demitra trade came too early in the Wild's history. A few more lean years and some richer drafts may have led to more sustainable success.

If that's the case, then I'm screwed for picking Mitchell for O'Donnell.

saywut 05-04-2010 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by State of Hockey (Post 25617435)
Demitra trade, hands down. That trade moved the Wild from the shadows to the limelight. In the end it only lasted two years, but those were two fun ones. Without the Demitra trade, we may be sitting at a 6 year playoff drought.

Agree. The downfall of the Demitra trade was DR's unwillingness to find JL a competent linemate for him and Gaborik. Todd Fedoruk is not a top-6 forward, he is a fringe-NHLer.

thestonedkoala 05-04-2010 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by State of Hockey (Post 25617435)
Without the Demitra trade, we may be sitting at a 6 year playoff drought.

Or Riser would have been out of a job, we wouldn't be saddled with this many contracts, Gaborik might have been re-signed or at least traded for assets and we wouldn't be having these middling years were we aren't good enough to make the playoffs and not down and out horrible to get a high draft pick (and no 9 is not a high draft pick. think top 3).

GopherState 05-04-2010 04:09 PM

Or Riser would have been given an extension, Gaborik would not have ever been injured, all free agents would want to sign here and there would be a couple Stanley Cups in Xcel Energy Center.

See it's fun to play the "what if" game.

Jarick 05-05-2010 04:08 PM

Has to be Lats-Pouliot. We got what looks to be a young 30+ goal scoring power forward for an underachieving skill guy. Runner up is Demitra for O'Sullivan and 1st, but Demo didn't seem to like it here and left for nothing.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.