HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Edmonton Oilers (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   Waived: Tim Kennedy (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=805587)

tv14 08-02-2010 03:30 PM

Tim Kennedy
 
"Tim kennedy placed on waivers, likely buyout coming." (Rishaug twitter)
http://twitter.com/TSNRyanRishaug

Heres his stats:
http://hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=73802

08/09 67 points in 73 games in ahl.
Last year had a decent rookie year.

He is 5'10" and is 24 years old. While I think he is small he brings alot of grit and heart, after watching him last year in the playoffs, I began to know who he was and I liked his playing style.

He has decent potential and is relatively young, he could be a player we bring in for the 3rd line maybe, and still fit in with the age group of our young core.

What do you guys think?

dnicks17 08-02-2010 03:37 PM

Would rather a veteran with more size for our 3rd line.

misfit 08-02-2010 03:41 PM

I thought he was an RFA. Obviously not.

reginaoil 08-02-2010 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tv14 (Post 27207462)
"Tim kennedy placed on waivers, likely buyout coming." (Rishaug twitter)
http://twitter.com/TSNRyanRishaug

Heres his stats:
http://hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=73802

08/09 67 points in 73 games in ahl.
Last year had a decent rookie year.

He is 5'10" and is 24 years old. While I think he is small he brings alot of grit and heart, after watching him last year in the playoffs, I began to know who he was and I liked his playing style.

He has decent potential and is relatively young, he could be a player we bring in for the 3rd line maybe, and still fit in with the age group of our young core.

What do you guys think?

So does Cogliano but he is signed and had more upside. Only so many rister spots to go around.

tv14 08-02-2010 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by misfit (Post 27207651)
I thought he was an RFA. Obviously not.

He was awarded under 1.5 million in arbitration, so Buffalo couldnt walk away, inturn had to match and buy him out if they didnt want to keep him. Thats what they were saying on the Rumors Board.

tv14 08-02-2010 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reginaoil (Post 27207674)
So does Cogliano but he is signed and had more upside. Only so many rister spots to go around.

Cogliano isnt signed, unless I missed something. And is he suited for a 3rd line role? I dont think he is.

Stoneman89 08-02-2010 04:01 PM

Sounds like he could be a good AHL signing. The org does need a few more pieces down there.

Joey Moss 08-02-2010 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by misfit (Post 27207651)
I thought he was an RFA. Obviously not.

He was, he went to arbitration.

Bryanbryoil 08-02-2010 04:13 PM

I'd take a run at signing him, the kid has some decent skill.

Nugent93Hopkins 08-02-2010 06:14 PM

Any relation to Tyler Kennedy?

Tavaresmagicalplay* 08-02-2010 06:46 PM

It seems to me he put up relatively good numbers on the 3rd line. Even in the playoffs. I see no reason why they would waive him other than the obvious. They're too small as a team. Seems like they are giving his spot to a guy like Kassian or Luke Adam. If Buffalo is waiving him because they are too small why would Tamby claim him?

TheBusDriver 08-02-2010 07:03 PM

Why sign him? So he can take a spot from OMark or someone else? No thanks.

Vagabond 08-02-2010 07:12 PM

No thanks. I'd rather give an open chance to Omark.

jumptheshark 08-03-2010 04:49 AM

File this under discussions created everytime ANY player is put waivers. Cogliano is better

ERC91 08-03-2010 09:28 AM

To all the people saying that he is worse than Cogliano or Omark and just takes a spot away from them:

He actually is a completely different player: Buffalo fans described him as some one fiesty, who is a bit like a pest. Maybe a bit like Brule.
So he is ways better suited for a 3rd line role than the other two, who are top six forwards.

Besides Burke (who definitely doesn't like small players overly) choosed him for Team USA over players like Gaustad or Conolly, which also has to mean something.

Besides IMO it would make quite a nice 3rd line.

Jones - Brule - Kennedy

Jones has decent size and Brule allthough not big plays at least like a normal sized guy. Besides Brule and Kennedy both play a game that is quite unsavory for their oponents

Of course I would also rather have an experienced 3rd liner, but maybe there is just no one available: We quite surely won't get Belanger, Madden or Morrison, who all will likely look for contenders and Asham also seems not to be on our list as well (Ryan Rishaug tweeted this).

Besides there is no risk in picking him up: We give him a try-out at camp and if he doesn't make the team, he gets waived again. Then he either is gone or we have another nice addition for OKC.

Nugent93Hopkins 08-03-2010 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ERC91 (Post 27218504)
To all the people saying that he is worse than Cogliano or Omark and just takes a spot away from them:

He actually is a completely different player: Buffalo fans described him as some one fiesty, who is a bit like a pest. Maybe a bit like Brule.

Besides Burke (who definitely doesn't like small players overly) choosed him for Team USA over players like Gaustad or Conolly, which also has to mean something.

Besides IMO it would make quite a nice 3rd line.

Jones - Brule - Kennedy

Jones has decent size and Brule allthough not big plays at least like a normal sized guy. Besides Brule and Kennedy both play a game that is quite unsavory for their oponents

Of course I would also rather have an experienced 3rd liner, but maybe there is just no one available: We quite surely won't get Belanger, Madden or Morrison, who all will likely look for contenders and Asham also seems not to be on our list as well (Ryan Rishaug tweeted this).

Besides there is no risk in picking him up: We give him a try-out at camp and if he doesn't make the team, he gets waived again. Then he either is gone or we have another nice addition for OKC.

This.

ERC91 08-03-2010 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knee (Post 27218896)
This.

Allthough I might make a fool of myself, I admit that I don't know what this actually means.

But I assume it's an agreement, so thanks ;)

ERC91 08-03-2010 11:56 AM

Obviously he has cleared waivers. Strange....
I thought that at least one team could have used him.


EDIT: Now bought out.

Master Lok 08-03-2010 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ERC91 (Post 27220745)
Obviously he has cleared waivers. Strange....
I thought that at least one team could have used him.


EDIT: Now bought out.

Obviously if he passed through waivers, then no other team thought he was worth $1 million per year either.

It's an odd case. Taking a look at the facts.

Arbitration - $1 million one year contract.

2009-10 season. Tim Kennedy scores 10 goals, 16 assists in a mostly 3rd line role with the Sabres. His salary was $635,000 last year.

It's strange that no team thought he was worth $1 million.

Calgary Oilers 08-03-2010 05:12 PM

Darcy Regier's interview on why they bought out Kennedy:

http://sabres.nhl.com/club/podcastpl...d=16&iid=23829

oilersnyc 08-10-2010 08:52 AM

Saw this on the main rumors page ...

Quote:

Tim Kennedy is ready to move on from the disappointment of his ugly departure from the Sabres. Sources tell News 4 Sports that three teams are interested in signing the forward.

The Blackhawks, Oilers and Maple Leafs are vying for the services of the gritty, tough and talented left wing. Kennedy was bought-out by the Sabres last week, in a salary dispute based on Kennedy's $1 million dollar arbitration ruling.
http://www.wivb.com/dpp/sports/sabre...er-Tim-Kennedy

s7ark 08-10-2010 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oilersnyc (Post 27317584)
Saw this on the main rumors page ...



http://www.wivb.com/dpp/sports/sabre...er-Tim-Kennedy

Do not want. I really hope we don't sign this guy. He isn't what we need at all.

Bryanbryoil 08-10-2010 11:31 AM

I actually like the kid and think that he has a fair amount of talent. He's still young and able to play in the top or bottom 6.

dobiezeke* 08-10-2010 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by s7ark (Post 27318242)
Do not want. I really hope we don't sign this guy. He isn't what we need at all.

Which part do we not need at all? The grit? The talent? The ability to be an effective 3rd line player, which several posters have stated Cogliano does not have. Is it the cost effective price tag?

I don't believe he is a savior to the Oilers however as several have posted his price is cheap and would be a decent fit for the bottom 6. Geez, what did we just pay to have JFJ sit in the press box half the season?

I believe ERC91's post was comprehensive enough to indicate that Kennedy is in fact a player that the Oilers could use, and need. Cogliano, not so much.

IceBomber 08-10-2010 12:43 PM

He wouldn't be a bad addition, especially if it's going to cost less than a million bucks.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.