HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Proposal: Nyr/tor/car (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=807100)

number11 08-06-2010 04:37 PM

Nyr/tor/car
 
To rags: schenn

To car: stall

To tor: sutter

zeus3007* 08-06-2010 04:40 PM

Why? Why would any of these teams move their young star?

Oroku Saki* 08-06-2010 04:41 PM

Terrible, just terrible.

danishh 08-06-2010 04:53 PM

you're suggesting that new york would trade staal for schenn, which is simply silly.

Thirty One 08-06-2010 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by danishh (Post 27270995)
you're suggesting that new york would trade staal for schenn, which is simply silly.

you were a lot nicer than I was going to be.

vwg* 08-06-2010 05:06 PM

Sorry guys I don't actually play in the NHL.

leafsfuture 08-06-2010 05:07 PM

How does this help the teams?

Schenn may have more upside than Staal, but hes still a year of development behind, and isnt as proven.

As for Schenn for Sutter, Sutter has upside, but he will never be more than a 55 pt guy.

Thirty One 08-06-2010 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leafsfuture (Post 27271173)
Schenn may have more upside than Staal

but he doesn't

Quote:

Originally Posted by leafsfuture (Post 27271173)
As for Schenn for Sutter, Sutter has upside, but he will never be more than a 55 pt guy.

then why does he have more upside?

This 08-06-2010 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leafsfuture (Post 27271173)
How does this help the teams?

Schenn may have more upside than Staal, but hes still a year of development behind, and isnt as proven.

As for Schenn for Sutter, Sutter has upside, but he will never be more than a 55 pt guy.

?

So basically you are saying
Schenn > Staal
Schenn > Sutter

Just making sure. :facepalm:

theduster77 08-06-2010 05:31 PM

just brutal

91Kadri91 08-06-2010 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by This (Post 27271329)
?

So basically you are saying
Schenn > Staal
Schenn > Sutter

Just making sure. :facepalm:

Wow, nice to know you can't read.

He said the Staal is more proven, but Schenn may have more upside.

So, basically, as of right now, he's saying:

Staal>Schenn.

LeafOfBread 08-06-2010 06:06 PM

Stupid for all 3 teams.

Skipee 08-06-2010 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leafsfuture (Post 27271173)
Schenn may have more upside than Staal, but hes still a year of development behind, and isnt as proven.

I spilled water on myself laughing at that one.

Jeff Finger 4 08-06-2010 06:17 PM

http://media.photobucket.com/image/i...assi7/ibtl.gif

ECL 08-06-2010 06:18 PM

The Rangers give up by far the best player here. Just a LOL worthy deal.

Quacktastic 08-06-2010 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erik Stall (Post 27271165)
Sorry guys I don't actually play in the NHL.

I think you were confusing Erik Stall with his brother Mark Stall.

Ludicrous Speed 08-06-2010 06:41 PM

Schenn does not have more upside than Staal. Even if he did, the Rangers still say no because it's not worth downgrading at the position on the basis that Schenn could become better.

ECL 08-06-2010 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeafOfBread (Post 27271901)
Stupid for all 3 teams.

Not for Carolina. They run away laughing.

leafsfuture 08-06-2010 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skipee (Post 27271926)
I spilled water on myself laughing at that one.

How? Schenn is two years younger, and at his age, Staal could only manage 2 goals and 10 points. Schenn had 5 goals. Defensively, Schenn is a more solid hitter, and has a better first pass. While Staal gets the nod in all other aspects, Schenn clearly has more to give.

I think its people like you who fail to understand how development works. Im not saying NY should trade Staal for Schenn, because if I was NY i wouldnt. What i am saying is that Luke has more potential.

Thirty One 08-06-2010 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leafsfuture (Post 27272843)
What i am saying is that Luke has more potential.

we get that. that's the point we all find ridiculous.

91Kadri91 08-06-2010 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -31- (Post 27272922)
we get that. that's the point we all find ridiculous.

It's actually not that ridiculous to say he has more potential. I don't exactly believe Schenn will turn out to be the better player, but I do believe he has the potential to be just as good. It''s hard to say though, no one really knows how good there going to be in the future. We'll just have to wait and see.

OrioleWay 08-06-2010 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonathan. (Post 27272481)
Not for Carolina. They run away laughing.

No, actually.

Sutter is way to important. Canes say big no.

iceless 08-06-2010 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by number11 (Post 27270765)
To rags: schenn

To car: stall

To tor: sutter

Oh for *******'s sake... are people STILL having a problem with this?

vwg* 08-06-2010 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonathan. (Post 27272481)
Not for Carolina. They run away laughing.

Not exactly but who watches the Canes anyway?!

iceless 08-06-2010 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by caniacho (Post 27273131)
No, actually.

Sutter is way to important. Canes say big no.

M.Staal >> B.Sutter... now and in the future.

Also, D is Carolina's most pressing need. You're just arguing to the contrary because your ego is too big to admit the glaring value gap. Get real. :shakehead


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.