HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   New York Rangers (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   Dean McAmmond a Sather Fav??? (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=89075)

BDubinskyNYR17* 07-05-2004 01:56 AM

Dean McAmmond a Sather Fav???
 
Im guessing Sather is eyeing McAmmond. Sather had him in edmonton. He is fast LW, and good on the PK. I would not be surprised if McAmmond is with the Rangers next season. What u guys think?? :yo:

http://www.calgaryflames.com/cgi-bin...displayNode=65

Bicycle Repairman 07-05-2004 02:03 AM

Dude has chronic back problems. His playing days may be done.

Chief 07-05-2004 02:03 AM

I don't know if he's a Sather fave but he played well enough with Conroy and Iginla in his first go-round with the Flames. I would have no problem with him being a Ranger. He's a good all around player. Has good chemistry with Conroy which might help bring Conroy here. And best of all, he should come cheap and short-term - just the kind of guy the Rangers should be looking at....umm, except for the wonky back (if that's the case).

little a from da bx 07-05-2004 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOrtmeyer41
Im guessing Sather is eyeing McAmmond. Sather had him in edmonton. He is fast LW, and good on the PK. I would not be surprised if McAmmond is with the Rangers next season. What u guys think?? :yo:

http://www.calgaryflames.com/cgi-bin...displayNode=65

i think we can use a lw so he could work out i mean as a second line lw, we need a first. dont kow if he has the skill to be on line 1, if u know otherwise thans tate your opinion, buit i guess he could be a good pick up. maybe a pick up of....we would wind up with a center and lw on both of those signingsand any of those 3 are excellent pk'ers

mccamond and conroy
or
mccamond and rolston

then on d just one defense man either --------mcgillis or matvichuk ------

that would be good enough on signings a lw a center and defenceman

i vbeen hearing not to mny good things on matvichuk, maybe better off with mcgillis decent defensively and has good size

Chief 07-05-2004 02:10 AM

I think McGillis is a better all around defender than Matvichuk. McGillis can play the PP and get big minutes if necessary. Nice to have.

BDubinskyNYR17* 07-05-2004 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief
I think McGillis is a better all around defender than Matvichuk. McGillis can play the PP and get big minutes if necessary. Nice to have.

yea, and has hard shot. Another d id like is Schneider.

little a from da bx 07-05-2004 10:26 AM

still cant believe sather choose malakhov over schneider that was horrible,ive always been afan of schneider he can also play a tough and nasty when necessary.i would like to see maybe mcgillis and schneider if we move poti and rachunek.. how about.

tyutin- kaspar
pock- mcgillis
scneider - lampman/nycholat

like to see more of north american defense line up.

Balej20* 07-05-2004 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by little a from da bx
still cant believe sather choose malakhov over schneider that was horrible,ive always been afan of schneider he can also play a tough and nasty when necessary.i would like to see maybe mcgillis and schneider if we move poti and rachunek.. how about.

tyutin- kaspar
pock- mcgillis
scneider - lampman/nycholat

like to see more of north american defense line up.

I've always been a fan of a more North American lineup as a whole.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.