HFBoards

HFBoards (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/index.php)
-   Nashville Predators (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/forumdisplay.php?f=33)
-   -   Prospect Info: Summer Prospect Poll #5 (http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=963265)

Top 6 Spaling 08-03-2011 09:48 PM

Summer Prospect Poll #5
 
Continue

#1: Jon Blum 73%
#2: Ryan Ellis 45%
#3 Roman Josi 59%
#4. Taylor Beck 33%

Top 6 Spaling 08-03-2011 09:51 PM

Please note that Blake Geoffrion has been added.

I Will Son 08-03-2011 09:51 PM

Smith, due to how the staff has praised him

CalleJAMkrok 08-03-2011 10:04 PM

ekholm, only bcuz i saw him as the fourth =)

Roger Explosion 08-03-2011 10:25 PM

Getting a lot tougher to choose now, I'm going with Craig Smith.

Legionnaire11 08-03-2011 10:28 PM

i've voted Lindback since poll #2, seriously where has all the Lindback love gone?

Top 6 Spaling 08-03-2011 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Legionnaire11 (Post 35648925)
i've voted Lindback since poll #2, seriously where has all the Lindback love gone?

Im with you. He looked great in relief last year.

Paranoid Android 08-04-2011 04:01 AM

Rookie of the year in the SEL.. Ekholm

token grinder 08-04-2011 09:02 AM

eckholm, because blum, lindback, halischuck, and geoffrion are not prospects.

utmfisher19 08-04-2011 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by token grinder (Post 35655579)
eckholm, because blum, lindback, halischuck, and geoffrion are not prospects.

this

AtlantaWhaler 08-04-2011 10:43 AM

Smith again.

ffwrx 08-04-2011 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by token grinder (Post 35655579)
eckholm, because blum, lindback, halischuck, and geoffrion are not prospects.

I would have voted Eckholm, but since Lindback was there I voted for him. In the next round it will be tough to choose between ekholm and Geoffrion if Geoffrion is still there.

Joe T Choker 08-04-2011 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by token grinder (Post 35655579)
eckholm, because blum, lindback, halischuck, and geoffrion are not prospects.

Blum played 23 games

Lindback only played 22 games

Bam Bam with 20 games

Halischuk with 48 games

Bookmark this page

Prospect Criteria:

Quote:

A player will be considered a prospect until he meets the following criteria:

If a prospect is a skater (forward, defenseman) and has played in 65 NHL games or more before the completion of the season of his 24th birthday; or, if a goaltender has played in 45 NHL games before the completion of the season of his 24th birthday, that player will be considered graduated to the NHL. Conversely, if a player completes the season of his 24th birthday without passing those milestones, then that player will no longer be considered a prospect by Hockey’s Future, regardless of the player’s status with his NHL club.

An NCAA player who signs his first contract at or above the age of 22 has three years to meet the above criteria (65/45), while those NCAA players that turn pro under the age of 22 will be subjected to the criteria above.

European players who sign their first NHL contract at or above the age of 22 have three seasons from the time they sign that contract to meet the above criteria. Those European players below the age of 22 that have signed a NHL contract will be subjected to the criteria in section one.

Section one is the meat of the criteria as it will govern the majority of players that vie for a NHL roster spot. Sections two and three are simply an acknowledgement that some prospects arrive on the scene a bit later than their peers, thus needing some time past their 24th birthday to develop into an NHL-caliber player.

The graduated list on team pages will consist of players who are considered graduated to the NHL. A skater prospect may sit on the graduated list until he has played 130 games in the NHL. A goalie prospect may sit on the graduated list until he has played 90 games in the NHL.

NOTE: These are general guidelines and should be followed the majority of the time but certain players may still be listed as prospects if circumstances warrant.

utmfisher19 08-04-2011 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave is a killer (Post 35659011)

Ok... They are still ROOKIES, but not prospects.

Just because a player is still considered to be a rookie, does not make him a prospect in my opinion. Even if HF considers them to be prospects based on that link (which, btw, thanks for that link)

I Will Son 08-04-2011 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by utmfisher19 (Post 35665703)
Ok... They are still ROOKIES, but not prospects.

Just because a player is still considered to be a rookie, does not make him a prospect in my opinion. Even if HF considers them to be prospects based on that link (which, btw, thanks for that link)

my view

AtlantaWhaler 08-10-2011 11:17 AM

Soooo....Does this continue? I was noticing some teams on #'s 11 and 13.

TMI 08-10-2011 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave is a killer (Post 35659011)

I'm pretty sure games dressed as even a back up count as "games played". That's why I don't include Lindback on my list of prospects.

I'm going with Ekholm again.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.