View Single Post
Old
07-29-2007, 08:57 PM
  #50
chip chipperson*
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 2,033
vCash: 500
all right everyone and especially you chosen, the point is do you retire graves number. not do you retire graves number even though there are hall of famers that didn't get their number retired. don't hold it against graves that past rangers didn't get their numbers retired. look, we all know that its most likely not going to happen, but that doesn't mean he is not deserving. you guys make it seem like if bathgate, cook, park and boucher just to name a few got their numbers retired, that you would then be ok to retire graves' number 9. if you agree to that than you are agreeing that graves' number belongs in the rafters. that is my point when talking about past rangers. this is about graves its either yes or no. not "bathgate should get his up there first."

so chosen if you want to write another post about kovalev go ahead waste your time.


Last edited by chip chipperson*: 07-29-2007 at 09:08 PM.
chip chipperson* is offline