View Single Post
Old
03-09-2004, 12:03 AM
  #13
in the hall
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,009
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by L.I.RangerFan
Why don't we agree to disagree

It is just my opinion that the Rangers need more defensive prospects and Erskine would be a step in the right direction. If the Rangers trade anymore d-men, they have to get someone back or bring up someone from Hartford. Erskine can no longer be sent to the farm unless he clears waivers. He is better then Dale and like I said would be a good starting point in a trade. I never said Rucinsky for Erskine straight up. So would this be good for you two

Rucinsky for Erskine and a 1st.
that we can agree on...

in the hall is offline