View Single Post
Old
03-13-2004, 04:05 PM
  #21
klingsor
HFBoards Sponsor
 
klingsor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 14,203
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch
and Fleury too. But let's get some facts straight... York began his NHL career a year or two older than Lundmark after having put up some very good numbers in college. Lundmark never did put up very good numbers in Hartford, but he did put up decent numbers for a 20 year old. Then, he did get jerked around a bit as the organization didn't want to be patient. York, however, is stronger than Jamie. He's a bit more effective as a result, I believe. The skills are nearly the same.

Whether Jamie has it or not I cannot say. I can say that he skates extremely well. He shoots extremely well. He's not stupid out there. He tries very hard every shift. Can a kid with those tools be taught some finer points of the game? Can a coach see his strengths and play to them (can he not shoot the puck playing the off-wing with laser-like precision? - Would Jagr feeding him and Holik creating space benfit him and give him the confidence he needs - and us and the coaching staff to see if he's got it?).
Agree 100 percent.

Put him in the best situation to produce and see if he can. No guarantee that he will, but what do we have to lose?

Man, now is the perfect tome to find out something about a lot of young players.

Obviously, some of us already know that Lundmark doesn't have it. I ain't no expert so I don't know.

klingsor is offline