Is Michaud that much worse then Damphousse?
View Single Post
03-30-2004, 07:48 PM
Time to Get Down
Join Date: Mar 2002
Originally Posted by
You know what, I think that the difference is experience. Michaud is a lot better than Damphousse. Damphousse is consistant...in giving 3 goals a game. For some reason people here won't give Michaud time to get experience, and that's too bad, because Michaud has all the tools to be good. Looks like for his specific case they forgot goalies take time to develop but for others goalies this fact exists.
Why is Jarvis playing Damphousse all the time when Michaud is so much better? Makes no sense to me. When every game is important to stay in 1st in their division, Jarvis is going to go with who he thinks will win the game. When he puts in Damphousse in every game back to back to back right after coming back from injury, that should tell you that Jarvis isn't overly thrilled with Michaud (who he even said in his pregame interview that Michaud didn't have his best games out there while Damphousse was injured).
When Savard did an interview at the Dogs game the other day, when talking about the Danis signing, he said that they had been interested in Danis for the last 2 years. He also said that Gainey must have felt the the goaltending position needed more depth.
View Public Profile
Visit montreal's homepage!
Find More Posts by montreal