Habs vs. Isles - Mar. 31/04
View Single Post
04-01-2004, 10:06 AM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Originally Posted by
Hold yer horses chicpea, I had to take that game in doses!
Itís on this kind of night that every single player goes home, no matter if he played well or not, and hides his head in his hands just before bed, embarrassed and ashamed at the collective effort displayed. Anyone whoís played competitive sports understands that when you get slapped *this* badly and itís entirely the fault of your team and not just the other teamís dominance, the night after is just about the worst time imaginable as you consider what you really should have done as a group.
Were there more than three or four players who put forth a solid effort on this evening? Oh, letís not play with words here, were there many at all who put forth *any* effort? How can we possibly be looking to the playoffs when we get smacked all over the ice by a team below us in the standings? Shouldnít we be at least competitive? Was there a smidgen of playoff hockey in our display? And finally, do you get the growing unpleasant feeling in the pit of your stomach that there are too many questions that have to be answered after a game like that?
And no falling on the excuses of sickness. Every team in this league has to get by on nights when players are struggling or out with injury. Before we take out the excuse card, letís first take a look at how far the LA Kings have come this year despite losing all their best players. They may not have made the playoffs, but they sure as heck have put in an admirable showing.
Theo: If, in the first five minutes, heíd managed to make those saves that weíre used to seeing, perhaps this doesnít get out of hand. Perhaps the team gathers itself. Now, Iím not laying blame, because in reality he was left out to dry, but letís be honest here and say that we expect him to make those saves on most nights. The second goal, while still an in-close shot, went between the wickets. And letís just not talk about that fifth goal Ė the one that Pedneault said was so perfect Theo had no chance. It went between his arm and his body, ergo saveable. No, the game is not on his shoulders at all, but he certainly didnít have a banner night. B-
Garon: One solid period. No complaints and a couple of nice saves in traffic. B+
Dykhuis: And here, one of the few bright spots Ė and what does it say when we can look at our AHL call-up and call him a bright spot. He was hardly flawless, but in his 17-plus minutes of ice time, he was darn good, way above what we should realistically expect from a #7/8 guy. B+
Rivet: Awful, simply awful. I canít remember the last time Iíve seen him make so many poor decisions, give so many pucks away, and most of all lose that many one-on-one battles. He was sick, not stupid, yet he played more like the latter at times. D
Brisebois: Putrid. His worst game all year by a country mile. Breeze-By was back in full form with the giveaways and the poor plays and poor play selection. Anyone take the time to count the number of passes that frittered off the heel of his stick? He had a poor night the previous night, he says. Guess what, everyone has Ďem. D-
Markov: Another bright point when you consider that he was paired with Breezy most of the night and while the latter earned himself a fat -3, Markov was even. He wasnít great, and certainly not a stalwart as he can be, but he was solid enough and did most things right. B
Souray: Wrist still hurting, is it? A couple of head-scratching mental errors combined with the falling-off-the-heel-of-the-stick syndrome in passing made this one a real struggle. In his case, thank the Forum Gods that heís got another two games to fine something that passes for being in form. C-
Komisarek: He finished as a plus. Now, I could just leave it there and let that stat speak for itself, but letís look a little more. He played a consistent shift, over 16 minutes of ice time; he made laser sharp passes Ė the only defender who was able to do that; heís starting to get more proactive with his plays and looked confident out there for almost every moment. In other words, he looked like an NHL defender and one who deserves playoff ice time. B+
Sundstrom: An adequate game, though he played barely over eleven minutes. He even used the body a little on this night and was one of about five guys that won battles along the boards. B
Ward: On a night when most of the rest of his teammates went into hibernation, Wardo brought out his best and worked his rear off all night. He was rewarded with a richly earned goal and his solid two-way play was a standard that only one other forward met. A-
Dowd: Thank you. Thank you for showing up and making the rest of the team look really bad as you worked every shift. Heís not a big hitter, but positionally heís fabulous and on this night he read poor DiPietro like some used paperback novel written by a third-rate hack. Can someone please tell Bob Gainey to find a few more like the ones heís picked up? Langdon, Begin and Dowd are magic. (Weíll ignore the *other* for now.) A
Kovalev: Speak of the Devil. Itís time to stop playing the Ranger game, at the very least. If I have to see another lazy penalty where he grabs or hooks someone from behind because he doesnít want to take an extra stride, I might make my way to Montreal to slap him myself. I understand heís struggling for confidence right now, but the way to get out of slumps is to WORK, not cheat. D
Juneau: I have never in my life seen that guy lose it. Ever. Suspension on the way for the high stick to the head, that much is sure. And the thing that bugs me the most about it is that it was a completely legal check that Webb threw. Juneau just lost it. Frustration I know, but wow. As for the rest of the game, it actually wasnít horrible and some of his former prowess for attack showed here and there. A couple of times that line made some noise. C+
Bulis: He started off fairly well but seemed to drizzle towards the end. Honestly, I didnít notice him much this game, and thatís not a great thing since someone with speed should be making their presence felt. C-
Dagenais: And Montreal thanks you for that one shift where you had all three of your shots. Other than that, you may have well have been picking tulips for some maiden faraway south. D-
Ribeiro: Can someone please check the mail? Apparently Ribs didnít get the memo that the season lasts 82 games. Perhaps heís thinking of how good heíd look on the beaches of Portugal, because he sure isnít worrying about how good he looks on the ice. I believe he had about two good passes all night and managed to create a couple of small plays that fizzled as well as a minor hissy fit when someone went offside. D+
Ryder: He started well, at least in terms of getting his shot off, though tonight he missed the net continually. At least, in his case, he still worked from beginning to end, and thatís something precious few could say after this one. C+
Perreault: If there are two less defensively aware wingers than Perreault and Zednik, Iíd sure like to see them. Yanic the Great was everything his name says and moreÖat least when it comes to modelling that mullet. He managed to attain the lofty -2 in barely over eleven minutes, which is no small feat for a mullet that size. From hot streak back to floundering fish in just over a week, and all without giving any effort. He should write books. F
Zednik: There was a shift, in the third, when he hustled like there was no tomorrow. Iím sure that occurred immediately after his coach tore him a new orifice. Once, other than that, he tried to break through the defence with something approximating offence, but that was it on this night. Other than that, he was abysmal defensively, atrocious offensively and glued to the bench for most of the third. Perhaps against Philly he should watch from the press box; anything to light a fire under him. D-
Koivu: Thereís plenty of frustration evident in his game as well and he didnít have a good night at all. There were a couple of shifts where he worked his butt off and made something happen, but again, it was few and far between and when youíre ostensibly the offensive catalyst, your job is to do something offensively. I loved when he dogged through two defenders and still managed to get the puck out in front of the goal, but that has to happen regularly. C-
Julien: You DO know you can call a time-out, donít you? Perhaps after the second goal you should have halted things, given them a moment to focus and to get back to playing hockey rather than running in circles like a bunch of mismatched dancers on ice.
PP/PK: Neither was great, though at least the PK was somewhat decent at times. The PP in particular is going to need a boost if theyíre to get anywhere in the playoffs. C-
Team: Allow me to guffaw. What team. F
We have two games left, one against the Flyers and the other against the Sabres and weíd better find something to get things righted or weíre going to be golfing pretty quickly. At this moment there are so many problems this team has that itís almost scary. Even if we lose both of the next two games, itís absolutely critical that we play solid hockey. If the team can make it to The Show having at least played a string of solid minutes, the playoff fever should help lift them to a respectable level, but if we go into those playoffs playing like thisÖ
And so we have Philly in Montreal tomorrow. I donít know what magic Julien and Gainey might have, but if they can find some, theyíd better use it. The Flyers are big, strong, playing fairly well, and getting a shot in the arm as Primeau returns. The most we can say about the Canadiens is that they still have a pulse.
And I canít believe I watched that disaster from beginning to end; I guess Iím a sucker for punishment.
A Concerned Fan
Good job Guy. I enjoy your post game reports.
View Public Profile
Howie Morenz's albums
Find More Posts by Howie Morenz