Leave Camm's alone...
View Single Post
04-08-2004, 01:52 PM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by
ok, i told myself i wasn't going to post anymore in this thread but just one more.
u see, punchy, i don't get how you can say that you "proved beyond any doubt" that someone "never struggled enough to be the reason he were sent down" based purely on stats. How do you "prove" struggle or the lack of? Now I am not sure how much science you have studied, but to "prove" something takes a lot more then just one sided statistics. Your use of offensive output as a method of "proof" that someone is "not struggling" is really laughable.
As tadite said, under your "proof logic", Pavel Rosa then would be even MORE adequate for the NHL then Cammalleri, but yet he is not up here. The all around game is something that cannot be "proven" through statistics and must be seen through watching the game. Even from that, much of it is perspective and opinion and can be called into question. So to say that you have "proven beyond any doubt" about anything is quite presumptuous.
One last example, Jaromir Jagr has played a career 1027 games and acquired 1309 points and has a career +/- of 207. Does this stat "prove" he has a great all around game? Through the logic that you are presenting, it would sure seem so. But anyone who has watched him would beg to differ. I hope that you can understand at least a little bit of the flaw in your "proof".
Good post KPD. You hit it right on the nail. He is just ignoring the fact that all he is going is
writing his own opinion.
The whole "making **** up" was just about that.
You can't use that limited amount of stats to prove anything.
Cammy's offensive stats do not show his all-around game or even his effectivness in those games. For him to say that he has proven anything is not just presumptuous it is simply wrong.
What I find even more funny is that when we ask for more evedence he simple starts to scream about how he already "proved" something.
I would love to see a hockey stat for all-around game or intensity or even ability. Those would be very usefull but as they don't exist (outside a video game) he simply does not have anything to stand on.
But whats the point? He is just going to once again ignore that little fact and keep screaming about how I said he was making **** up or that be proved something. So I am done.
So just keep making **** up punchy1 I am sure in your little world you can prove everything and anything.
P.S. I am a Cammy supporter. I really wish he has stayed up the whole year....
P.S.S. I am not going to make another post.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Tadite