View Single Post
02-10-2008, 04:44 PM
Registered User
Ola's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 18,640
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by in the hall View Post
this is the only time he mentiones phoenix, and in full context. where in the hell did you get the idea he is implying that type of return?
I read the article and commone sense...

Do you get the impression that Brooks thinks Slats should just dump Jagr after reading it? I didn't.

When we traded Leetch we got 2 prospects and a 1st round pick -- I doubt Slats would deal Jagr at the point we are right now for that kind of offer.

Wed want back something simular to what Philly got for Forsberg. A established player that makes sense for us on the ice right now, like a Hartnell, a top prospect and a 1st rounder. Or some combinations with the same value.

Most people are advocating that Jagr should be traded; under the assumption that he would bring back something really valueble. I don't see that happening.

Ola is offline   Reply With Quote