View Single Post
Old
05-16-2004, 11:10 AM
  #10
rnyquist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 646
vCash: 500
Please, someone explain to me how one could want Lindros back. He's either: A) producing, get badly hurt and lost for the season OR B) he does nothing, stays healthy but is a waste to the team.

So either we get a guy who plays amazing, but gets hurt constently, even during warm ups and his loss to the line up kills our chemistry and our offence. OR we get a guy who floats, plays the outside, is useless and takes up a roster spot.

For the life of me, i don't care if he comes from $2 dollars a year. He is bad for chemistry when he's always out and he's useless when he's playing safe. Why would ANYONE want to rely on a player who can AND WILL go out at any time for long periods. Look, the guy had a good year, it only really cost us Kim J, so lets cut our losses and move on.

rnyquist is offline