Thread: Apparently
View Single Post
Old
04-26-2008, 10:01 PM
  #36
ginosniper
Registered User
 
ginosniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 299
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomPlex View Post
Hahaha some of you are so funny. This play was as clear as day. We're not saying that THAT'S the reason why we lost. What we're saying is that it was a slash. And it was. It should've been a penalty on the Flyers, and that COULD'VE allowed us to tie it up, but not 100%.

The reffing was atrocious tonight, and this was just another example.

I don't think any of us are really complaining that it was a high stick over a penalty. Those who are looking for a high stick are pushing it too far.
I can't believe Habs fans are actually complaining about the reffing. You guys have gotten two calls in the late stages of the third/overtime that allowed you to prolong/win the hockey game. Reich's trip and the call on Richards were iffy and they basically won you the hockey game. Something tells me you weren't calling the officiating attrocious those nights. It was not a slash, it was not a highstick. It was, however, a goal that put the game out of reach.

ginosniper is offline   Reply With Quote