Thread: Value of: Kevin Bieksa
View Single Post
Old
06-11-2008, 12:11 PM
  #25
Aqualung
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Country: United States
Posts: 1,990
vCash: 500
I would keep Bieksa unless Cole decides agrees to sign an extension with the Canucks. His injuries are over-blown. It's not like Forseberg where its chronic self-caused groin or ankle injuries, most of them are secondary caused accidents.

However I think the Canucks better hold on to him.

Ohlund Salo
Mitchell Bieksa
Edler Krajicek

You guys have four left side dmen and only two right side dmen. Let's say you do trade for Cole and get rid of Bieksa. Who would the Canucks sign to join the top six? Another year of Miller? Rather have Bieksa. For the Canucks system dmen are more important than forwards.

Aqualung is offline   Reply With Quote