View Single Post
06-18-2008, 10:42 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Queens, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 5,381
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Levitate View Post
Again though, Karlsson seems kind of redundant. Meh, I think I like him better than Robak, but I feel like I'd rather the Rangers solidify their D with guys who can play the physical and defensive side of things, and then worry about adding another offensive defenseman on top of Sanguinetti

Could Eberle be converted to wing? He's listed as a center, and the Rangers are overstocked with those, but he sounds intriguing
why is he redundant? b/c we have Sangs who has never played in an NHL game and we don' know if he will ever pan out. Would it be redundant to get a high scoring RW b/c we have Cherapanov? I don't believe in redundancies while drafting b/c you don't know how a player will actually develop.

That being said I would love to get Karlsson. You just cant teach offensive skill like that. You can always teach defense, but not really offense which you are just blessed w/.

DontStepanMe is offline   Reply With Quote