View Single Post
Old
06-25-2008, 08:13 AM
  #25
squishy
Registered User
 
squishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,149
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edge View Post
This one is all about upside.

Korpikoski will make the NHL first. I expect him to be a nice, possibly very good two-way player. But I also see him as being borderline second line winger. Most likely, if he develops, he is a top notch third line winger. And there's nothing wrong with that.

Anisimov is a longer term project but I think he, alone with Cherapanov, are the real keys to the Rangers offensive future. He's got legit top 6 forward talent, so long as a team is willing to accept that this isn't going to be a player who starts to make an NHL impact until he's been in the league a few years.

In this case I go with Anisimov's upside vs. the safety that is Korpikoski.

Korpikoski is more certain to be a long-time NHL player, but Anisimov is more naturally talented.
This sums it up for me. Voted Anisimov, but it was a tough decision.

squishy is offline   Reply With Quote