View Single Post
06-26-2008, 07:55 PM
Registered User
FutureGM97's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
Country: United States
Posts: 6,832
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to FutureGM97
Originally Posted by 94now View Post
Only a superstar will be better then Jagr and you know that. Why do we need to rid of Jagr if we have plenty of holes in top 6 even if he stays?
You don't need a superstar to replace Jagr. Michael Ryder could become really good on Gomez' wing. Rolston could. Just because someone isn't a superstar doesn't mean they won't be better. Shane Doan had more points than Jagr did in less games and he isn't a superstar. That isn't a reason to keep Jagr.

FutureGM97 is offline   Reply With Quote